Still here for half a second?

You had Acro down as town during the night because of his "silliness". Then rescinded it. What made you change your mind?

purely numbers

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 01:26 GMT

#1907

On March 30 2013 10:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Show nested quote +

wow, a meta case on me. I play the same as town or mafia, believe or not, jsut that my intentions are different. But go on and expand this, you have been willing to do this a while anyways. I'm willing to hear that.

it's just brief; I actually will look into you tomorrow now. For the longest time I had written you off as paranoid town. XXXIX shows you're perfectly happy to take the lead as mafia (very few are). I don't really have an opinion of you now in this game.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 01:38 GMT

#1912

This is to Kei. I'm literally going to bed immediately after this post.

I'm assuming there's 4 mafia in a 16 player setup, that seems obvious.

Hapa is way too sensible and town-leader-y to be mafia I think. You/Corazon/s&b have claims that I can't disbelieve right now.

I assume sinani and Smurf are mafia. This leaves 2 mafia.

That's out of Oats/Acro/Dandel/rayn/prplhz/OO

I can't see prplhz being mafia with Smurf, that makes no sense.

Palmar and I had townread on Oats, so for now I'll discount him as well.

That leaves Acro/Dandel/Rayn/OO

From my POV 2 of them are gonna be mafia. I'm not sure on any of them. Dandel has threatened to shoot me twice (check out his references to Themed where he NKed me as town). OO maybe seems townie? I dunno. All these players I can give vague reasons for being town. Maybe i'll find time tomorrow to check into it, maybe i won't. But that's how i basically view the game right now.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 01:39 GMT

#1913

On March 30 2013 10:35 Keirathi wrote:

Show nested quote +

Hmmm?

I'm looking at XXXIX and I don't see rayne in the player list :o

Unless he was smurfing?

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=402424&user=27448

...

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 10:29 GMT

#1974

On March 30 2013 15:35 ObviousOne wrote:

Show nested quote +

Am I wrong in thinking that both Acro and Smurf can't both be mafia? I'm opening back up to the idea they could be.

you are wrong, as Kei is wrong (I think) that Acro and sinani can't both be mafia. Only just woken up, I have to digest this Acro stuff when I'm not so sleepy.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 11:06 GMT

#1976

On March 30 2013 19:57 ObviousOne wrote:
I'm still around because I'm stupid and drank all of the coffee. It didn't make me smarter though so talk me through it when you get around to it.

Just read what Kei wrote for a start. The thing to think about is when is someone "doomed". A mafia's objective changes markedly at this point, and goes into wifom-mode, rather than push-a-mislynch-mode.

I can't remember Kei's reasons for thinking sinani and Acro couldn't be mafia together even though I only read them 20 minutes ago, but I do remember thinking that they weren't good reasons. lol.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 12:44 GMT

#1983

On March 30 2013 21:42 Dandel Ion wrote:

Show nested quote +

And that makes me mafia or what, lol?

I just threatened a shot in a barely obscure enough fashion so that not any random scummer could guess it so I'd see if I'd get roleblocked or not. Since you would clearly understand the reference. I didn't, but I can't recall anybody claiming a roleblock (or mb I just missed it dunno), so I can't draw anything alignment-y from it.

now I said that I can also say that I SADLY don't actually have a gun or righteous fire would rain down on the infidels.

no, it gave you town points. Which is why I mentioned it.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 12:51 GMT

#1988

Because I'm entirely uninterested in conversing with you, as I've made clear already.

I didn't see the point if you were mafia of threatening to shoot me like that, I don't understand what you'd be trying to gain. It's not a massive point but it's been enough not to worry about you.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 12:54 GMT

#1990

If you read my post, my thought process is abundantly clear. I don't see how you're struggling to understand it.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 12:57 GMT

#1993

On March 30 2013 21:55 Dandel Ion wrote:
I'm pretty hungover maybe that's why.

I'm not calling you mafia, I'm just eliminating flipped people/claims/strong reads, eliminating connections that I can't see, and I'm left with the 4 names that you're on. It doesn't have much reflection on anything apart from that.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:01 GMT

#1998

On March 30 2013 21:59 Dandel Ion wrote:

Show nested quote +

well then you eliminated too many people, looks like.

Still pretty sure OO is town too.
I'd get modkilled for explaining it properly, BUT YOU CANT STOP ME FROM THINKING IT HAHA

Obvious said the same about me. It's all getting very weird.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:31 GMT

#2004

On March 29 2013 21:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Smurf will receive one of my votes.

rayn, can you tell me towards the end of Day 1, what you say in Smurf's posting that you thought made sense?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:32 GMT

#2005

EBWOP: I should say I'm referring to this post:

On March 28 2013 04:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##Unvote: ObviousOne
##Vote: Nisani

Time is running out and Nisani is way more scummier than Smurf. After rereading Smurf's filter i see he is actually making sense and has clearly reasoned thoughts which he is not afraid to express. Nisani is wishy-washy about everything besides a couple of town-reads which are based on really odd things in the first place. So i'll vote for Nisani because nobody other than marv (again) is apparently even reading my case on OO.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:50 GMT

#2007

On March 30 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
Lol, you people. I go away for the weekend and get called scum. Can't lynch me anyway, now use your brains.

Anyway, I am hating this useless marv, but it's his birthday. We shouldn't lynch him on his birthday.

Sinani, prplhz is way more open than he is as scum. You making a case on a probable townie doesn't get you town points in my book when you're on the chopping block.

hmm?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:53 GMT

#2010

I was wondering about the bit I bolded, sweetie.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:57 GMT

#2013

Ok. How do you feel about rayn?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 13:57 GMT

#2014

On March 30 2013 22:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
So you are claiming unlynchable offhandedly, but not claiming town. Interesting.

Also lying scum GET LYNCHED >.<
You claimed Vanilla townie at the start.

WAS THAT A LIE?

this is a good point.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 14:00 GMT

#2016

Why are you so casually claiming unlynchable now, Acro?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

March 30 2013 14:10 GMT

#2020

I'd quite like you to tell me exactly how your unlynchable role works.

Because it might be quite possible, setup wise, to ensure a favourable outcome using mechanics.