EPTWith that, I'm going to play Minecraft. Clearly I'm not looking at this the right way right now. Are you still good with a GK lynch sir?
The Game [N] - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
With that, I'm going to play Minecraft. Clearly I'm not looking at this the right way right now. Are you still good with a GK lynch sir? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
This nonsense about a "trap" is completely manufactured. I read GM's post about "I've been waiting for this" as "You've been saying you're scumhunting and I've seen no proof. Now you've posted it and I'm excited." | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Okay DP. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
How long til deadline? I want to read again... | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On March 17 2013 04:28 RyuSuzaku wrote: I find this interaction forced-there seems to be something off about how sandroba and greymist confront each other here. I wouldn't even call it confronting, really. I dislike sandroba more for the lack of reasoning, but I think it could be possible they are both mafia. ##vote sandroba On March 17 2013 04:32 RyuSuzaku wrote: although it is very suspicious that after being called out by sandroba, greymist made a simple and weak question and then chose not to address sandroba's accusation. Is sandroba's accusation not worthy of a response? Greymist was clearly around after, since he corrected the host just a while ago. Both of these quotes came from the guy who wrote the "super convincing case" against GreYMisT. I find this to be highly suspicious - at first he thinks they could both be scum, sandroba has done nothing between these posts, and suddenly sandroba is town worthy of a response? ##FoS Ryu | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I'm not cherrypicking, I just pointed out something suspicious. Why do you say I'm cherrypicking you? Your GreYMisT push is the only significant thing you've done the whole game, why should I not use information from that flip to try and draw conclusions about your alignment? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I guess I don't understand what is so suspicious of brushing off sandro's accusation of him. It was suspicious enough for you to vote him over, it was given without any kind of supporting reasoning. Why was it suspicious for GreY to brush off his accusation like that? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Like...what were you expecting from him? Could it not be argued that if he HAD come back and explained himself he was needlessly defending himself against weak accusations? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
:/ It doesn't matter right now. I think you're suspicious because of your backing off of sandroba for no reason. You weren't suspicious of him for lurking, so him replacing shouldn't have changed your read of him from "scummy" to "null". You outlined reasoning for thinking Sandroba was suspicious and now suddenly you're not. You say you "never really felt strongly about sandroba for scum" but your votes and reasoning explicitly state otherwise. You say "sandroba doesn't often explain his reads more than that on day 1" but in the orignal post voting for him you cite "lack of reasoning" as your reason for disliking him more than GreY. I think your actions don't line up with your explanations, and the fact that you lurked all through the wagon building on GreY exacerbates my suspicion. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Anyway, you can say I'm taking your pressure vote too seriously. That's fine. Your post explicitly states that you think he could be scum and that his interaction with GreY looked "forced" and that's reasoning for thinking someone is scum. Honestly you can try and "spin" that however you want, but it's explicit in your post. People need only read it to see the truth. I'm sick and tired of people that I accuse simply going "NO U". It's really annoying. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Your logical fallacy is Appeal to Popularity. Just because a lot of people agreed with it doesn't mean it's a good case. It's an EFFECTIVE case in that it convinced a lot of people, but that doesn't mean that the points are valid. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On March 19 2013 11:27 Mocsta wrote: Why are you being intentionally antagonistic in a meaningless way? What are you trying to achieve by calling me out in this manner? I know you can be better than this... This is the bullshit I'm talking about. The last game I saw you in as town there was like NO QUESTION that you were town. In this game, you snipe at people and appear to be trying to pick fights with people. It's like....scummy. And I know you're better than that as scum, so I'm left wondering what the fuck is going on. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Whatever I don't even care right now. Do whatever you want. | ||
| ||
