|
On March 13 2013 10:49 Moology wrote:
Right.. and i can easily say to you
"conjecture"
You know thrawn.. i know this is ya last game on the forum and all, but its no excuse to derp
And perhaps you should get a dictionary that wasnt published in the 1800s, cos your definition is tunneled beyond comprehension.
Keep being jealous
(moc)
You know Moc, you have posted absolutely nothing except attacking me. For a 'bad' vote. Which you admitted wasnt scummy.
Im am in Full Agreement after the bullshit you have shown.
OO's post was obviously premade and should be ignored.
Oats.
|
You guys are the monkeys then.
You say I have done nothing but attack; yet, I have been nothing but provoked
I dont see how you knowOO post was premade.. again more conjecture
What is it with you two and making brash statements founded upon no information?
VE and newbie said it perfectly; marv vote was bullshit.. wheres your excuse? there is none.
(moc)
|
On March 13 2013 12:14 Moology wrote:
You guys are the monkeys then.
You say I have done nothing but attack; yet, I have been nothing but provoked
I dont see how you knowOO post was premade.. again more conjecture
What is it with you two and making brash statements founded upon no information?
VE and newbie said it perfectly; marv vote was bullshit.. wheres your excuse? there is none.
(moc)
So you think OE's post was not premade? Thats not important.
What is important here is that you are OMGUS. You know what that means? Voting for me cause voting for you is bad play.
It might be. Again thats not important.
What is important is that you are harping on my 'bad' vote at the expense of scumhunting.
So far you have done nothing to dissuade me from putting my vote on you.
Town Mocsta isnt this prickly, isnt this hardass.
Oats.
|
DrP.
What is disappointing is that the thread is 2 pages long, and you missing things.
Even Thrawn acknowledged that not many have posted.
You say I haven't scum hunted, when its early Day1 and you're the only hydra online... Think about what you are saying Oats before you speak up pl0x.
All you guys have done in regards to moology is throw down a stupid vote, and disregard all context.
Theres a simple reason; VE hydra & iamp hydra said marv vote was stupid. I also happen to agree with that reason.
Because the vote was bullshit in the first place.
Why you guys decided to run with it, I have no idea. But go ahead and enlighten me.
(moc)
|
On March 13 2013 12:30 Moology wrote:
DrP.
What is disappointing is that the thread is 2 pages long, and you missing things.
Even Thrawn acknowledged that not many have posted.
You say I haven't scum hunted, when its early Day1 and you're the only hydra online... Think about what you are saying Oats before you speak up pl0x.
All you guys have done in regards to moology is throw down a stupid vote, and disregard all context.
Theres a simple reason; VE hydra & iamp hydra said marv vote was stupid. I also happen to agree with that reason.
Because the vote was bullshit in the first place.
Why you guys decided to run with it, I have no idea. But go ahead and enlighten me.
(moc)
DISREGARD ALL CONTEXT.
Is that a euphemism for not believing your bullshit?
with your response to my and Marv's vote, I firmly have a scum read on you.
Is that a problem?
Why do you keep mentioning VE and Iamp? I am talking about YOU. Thats like saying
Oh no officer I didnt kill that man, you see those 2 lawyers? They said that this other guy attacked me without provaction.
Yeah thats not gonna fly.
Get your cheeseballs together and man up.
|
mocsta my reasons for thinking you're scum came after my vote, not before. the vote itself was fairly meaningless at the time. don't act like you've never seen silly or unexplained page 1 votes before. your response to the vote and the way you choose to argue with me is what i'm interested in
|
|
|
Right.. So you and Thrawn continue to address Moology as above: and then accuse me of replying "prickly" LOL
Sound application of logic there guys.
Just like your position on OMGUS.
If I gave a shit about marvs vote, I woulda voted him back.. *THAT* would be OMGUS.
You guys on the other hand: latch onto something in the thread with no reasoning or intelligence and keep firing away. I am still struggling to believe how you are continuing to make efforts to elevate this matter.
So Dr.P. in short: Please be my guest and keep telling yourself you have evidence for a firm scum read.
When in reality: This game has 18 players; of which only 8 have made comments.
Yet (somehow) with no information on the board you act as if you have nailed scum. *LOL*
P.S.
Funny how you dont seem to care about the casting golems at all.
They went out of their way to comment on the thread status quo, and in the process present zero thought process towards the discussion.
Yet you just ignore this outright. Guess for you scum hunter extraordinaires this *must* be signals of town.
(moc)
|
On March 13 2013 12:37 DrParnassus wrote:
mocsta my reasons for thinking you're scum came after my vote, not before. the vote itself was fairly meaningless at the time. don't act like you've never seen silly or unexplained page 1 votes before. your response to the vote and the way you choose to argue with me is what i'm interested in
I already gave the context
Who ever you are
(moc)
|
On March 13 2013 12:49 Moology wrote:
Right.. So you and Thrawn continue to address Moology as above: and then accuse me of replying "prickly" LOL
Sound application of logic there guys.
Just like your position on OMGUS.
If I gave a shit about marvs vote, I woulda voted him back.. *THAT* would be OMGUS.
You guys on the other hand: latch onto something in the thread with no reasoning or intelligence and keep firing away. I am still struggling to believe how you are continuing to make efforts to elevate this matter.
So Dr.P. in short: Please be my guest and keep telling yourself you have evidence for a firm scum read.
When in reality: This game has 18 players; of which only 8 have made comments.
Yet (somehow) with no information on the board you act as if you have nailed scum. *LOL*
P.S.
Funny how you dont seem to care about the casting golems at all.
They went out of their way to comment on the thread status quo, and in the process present zero thought process towards the discussion.
Yet you just ignore this outright. Guess for you scum hunter extraordinaires this *must* be signals of town.
(moc)
So you are saying your vote on me is not OMGUS?
Also prickly is a meta read applied to you.
Some people are prickly as town. You arent.
Also why does everyone need to chime in before I have a scumread? You make no sense Mocsta.
About the CastingGolems, its not really alignment indicative that they chose to do that. Its not scummy, and its not townie.
|
On March 13 2013 12:49 Moology wrote:
P.S.
Funny how you dont seem to care about the casting golems at all.
They went out of their way to comment on the thread status quo, and in the process present zero thought process towards the discussion.
Yet you just ignore this outright. Guess for you scum hunter extraordinaires this *must* be signals of town.
(moc)
you think they are scum? then talk about that shit. sma eshit as before, you're bringing up things that have happened in the thread saying i should be focused on them instead of you, when you yourself are not focused on them. scum scrum crum rum rum rum scummy rum
|
I already addressed comments their (castinggolems) way. Dr.P
Again, its a short thread: and you are so tunneled you are not keeping up.
===================
You may have awareness of my meta; but you have no idea whats going on in my real world. I can guarantee the way I am talking in both my active games is nothing to do with my alignment. Not that it is any of your business.
I can be courteous and active as either alignment - it is not a tell for me. So its it agitates me severely hearing unfounded bullshit like this.
And why does everyone need to chime in? Man seriously, I do not want to continue conversation if you just throw back stupid comments like this.
Half the thread has not said anything, so there has been essentially zero meaningful conversation; and your "Read" on moology is based on "air". Me being pissed off in general has nothing to do with exhibiting a scum tell.
So yeah, others do need to chime in.
(moc)
I am done with the conversation. If you want to continue it, address the q to Omni.
|
On March 13 2013 13:17 Moology wrote:
I already addressed comments their (castinggolems) way. Dr.P
Again, its a short thread: and you are so tunneled you are not keeping up.
===================
You may have awareness of my meta; but you have no idea whats going on in my real world. I can guarantee the way I am talking in both my active games is nothing to do with my alignment. Not that it is any of your business.
I can be courteous and active as either alignment - it is not a tell for me. So its it agitates me severely hearing unfounded bullshit like this.
And why does everyone need to chime in? Man seriously, I do not want to continue conversation if you just throw back stupid comments like this.
Half the thread has not said anything, so there has been essentially zero meaningful conversation; and your "Read" on moology is based on "air". Me being pissed off in general has nothing to do with exhibiting a scum tell.
So yeah, others do need to chime in.
(moc)
I am done with the conversation. If you want to continue it, address the q to Omni.
Do you see the total lack of caring on my face? No? Well its there.
My point is that even if we are the only 2 talking and you outright claim scum in thread, does it mean I wait for the other 7 before 'Oh mocsta claimed scum *vote mocsta*' No right? So you being scummy is not dependent on the other people in the game.
I dont need you to tell me how to play, I can do it fine on my own.
OE, can you read Mocsta's posting and tell me if you think that they are townie?
Oats.
|
On March 13 2013 13:17 Moology wrote:
And why does everyone need to chime in? Man seriously, I do not want to continue conversation if you just throw back stupid comments like this.
Half the thread has not said anything, so there has been essentially zero meaningful conversation; and your "Read" on moology is based on "air". Me being pissed off in general has nothing to do with exhibiting a scum tell.
So yeah, others do need to chime in.
yes i agree with this. at least you have the balls to post unlike everyone else. i feel that our 'argument' has run its course and nothing productive can come out of continuing it. so for now....
--to be continued--
|
On March 13 2013 12:30 Moology wrote:
DrP.
What is disappointing is that the thread is 2 pages long, and you missing things.
Even Thrawn acknowledged that not many have posted.
You say I haven't scum hunted, when its early Day1 and you're the only hydra online... Think about what you are saying Oats before you speak up pl0x.
All you guys have done in regards to moology is throw down a stupid vote, and disregard all context.
Theres a simple reason; VE hydra & iamp hydra said marv vote was stupid. I also happen to agree with that reason.
Because the vote was bullshit in the first place.
Why you guys decided to run with it, I have no idea. But go ahead and enlighten me.
(moc)
Whoa there tiger. I never said marv vote was stupid. That's a either a misunderstanding or a LIE. I said that NewbieXXXIObsQT's comment on marv's read like stirring up shit. Something I was hoping someone would comment on...but no one did.
NewbieXXXIObsQT - please explain what you mean by "lynching bullshit instead of lynching scum".
|
barring a lot of what mocsta has written i think iamp is the scummiest so far. his question was completely pointless... marv's vote read as a "fuck you idc" policy vote. iamp wants to know why marv is policy voting.... could it not be more obvious? there is no answer that marv could give to iamp's question that would help iamp formulate a read on marv... the question was a waste of words and only intended to make it look like iamp is scumhunting
also town iamp doesn't qualify his accusations with stuff like "for obvious reasons"
so,
##unvote
##vote: Newbie XXXI: Obs QT
i'm drunk, really gotta sleep. gonna be real dissappointed if the activity remains the same
as far as mocsta... i'm still kinda pissed at him, but whatever, becuase we were the only 2 fucking people talking in the thread. so it's natural that i'd have a scumread on him. mocsta plz be nice TT
|
While the battle between Moology and DrParnassus rages on, it seems that Moology is slinging mud elsewhere, attempting to deflect some of the attacks towards us, Wave. I'm not really sure what he wants from us, the game is only a few hours old!
That's right, Soniv. And it is difficult to make reads when more than half of the players are still sitting at the nexus! I'm not sure I want to make a definitive decision based on an early game pissing contest between two players. Aaaand DrParnassus appears to be drunk. It's never a good thing to mix drinking and Mafia, Soniv.
Hey, now. There aren't any cycle changes for me to confuse just yet!
|
On March 13 2013 14:16 TLCastingGolems wrote:
While the battle between Moology and DrParnassus rages on, it seems that Moology is slinging mud elsewhere, attempting to deflect some of the attacks towards us, Wave. I'm not really sure what he wants from us, the game is only a few hours old!
That's right, Soniv. And it is difficult to make reads when more than half of the players are still sitting at the nexus! I'm not sure I want to make a definitive decision based on an early game pissing contest between two players. Aaaand DrParnassus appears to be drunk. It's never a good thing to mix drinking and Mafia, Soniv.
Hey, now. There aren't any cycle changes for me to confuse just yet!
##unvote
##vote:TLCastingGolems
this vote stays until you decide to stop giving objective, non-opinionated commentary. subjective commentary is the only useful commentary
|
On March 13 2013 13:54 DrParnassus wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 13:17 Moology wrote:
I already addressed comments their (castinggolems) way. Dr.P
Again, its a short thread: and you are so tunneled you are not keeping up.
===================
You may have awareness of my meta; but you have no idea whats going on in my real world. I can guarantee the way I am talking in both my active games is nothing to do with my alignment. Not that it is any of your business.
I can be courteous and active as either alignment - it is not a tell for me. So its it agitates me severely hearing unfounded bullshit like this.
And why does everyone need to chime in? Man seriously, I do not want to continue conversation if you just throw back stupid comments like this.
Half the thread has not said anything, so there has been essentially zero meaningful conversation; and your "Read" on moology is based on "air". Me being pissed off in general has nothing to do with exhibiting a scum tell.
So yeah, others do need to chime in.
(moc)
I am done with the conversation. If you want to continue it, address the q to Omni. Do you see the total lack of caring on my face? No? Well its there. My point is that even if we are the only 2 talking and you outright claim scum in thread, does it mean I wait for the other 7 before 'Oh mocsta claimed scum *vote mocsta*' No right? So you being scummy is not dependent on the other people in the game. I dont need you to tell me how to play, I can do it fine on my own. OE, can you read Mocsta's posting and tell me if you think that they are townie? Oats.
Whoa whoa whoa...did you just ask one head of a hydra if your attack on the other head of the hydra is justified? What do you think he's going to say?
Like.........really?
+ Show Spoiler +
|
"9. Dirk Hardpec (Palmar + WhereBugsGo)"
Holy shit this actually happened? I thought it was a joke. I'm not even going to bother getting excited. This hydra should be called "WillNeverReadVEsPostsEver".
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
