|
Yo, be easy and stop buggin folks. True, dis game be tight, but we don't want dis gettin outta hand and turnin into beef.
On March 11 2013 03:01 HiroPro wrote:
yo, unless one of them admits they were lying right now, we should be lynching between kurumi and bugs today. both of them have claimed chezinu - bugs's anagram is a an anagram for brown brotherhood.
at the moment, i'm leaning towards kurumi. in particular notice what kurumi says after he has gotten his role (but before his alignment), "this sucks". kurumi is a player who likes to play around and troll frequently. it's very unlikely that he would be unhappy about receiving chezinu as a role. the logical conclusion is that kurumi is a faker.
##Vote Kurumi
also to the people who don't understand why i would ask everyone to just flat out say who they are. this is in part because my personality dislikes shennanies like what's going on right now. it's not something that i care about personally much.
Aight, I'mma lay dis down fo yo. Votin for non-alignment reasons be wack. Na mean? Role playin be dope and errbody should be crunk bout it.
|
oatsmaster is the master of scummy, evil oats
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bhEZ7dd.png)
Exhibit One: Scum Are Inconsistent And Go After Easy Targets
On March 10 2013 18:54 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 18:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
Iamp what are you doing after that ridiculous list post which says NOTHING? My mistake, he went to sleep. I still dont like how he wasnt involved in the discussion beforehand, not like spammy Iamp.
So he starts out with a decent reason to be suspicious of iamperfection - big list post, not involved like his usual meta.
But then we see him latch on to mocsta for some reason:
On March 10 2013 22:37 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah.
Where is the jovial mocsta that spams up half the thread.
Come on.
##Vote: Mocsta
+ Show Spoiler [mocsta's posts the page before t…] +On March 10 2013 21:01 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 16:26 iamperfection wrote:
Do we agree with me that yamatos start is more of a town tell?
Do we agree that ve's misread of the situation is a point showing that he may in fact be scum? No & No No points for you. On March 10 2013 22:19 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 16:26 iamperfection wrote:
Do we agree with me that yamatos start is more of a town tell?
Do we agree that ve's misread of the situation is a point showing that he may in fact be scum? Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:06 supersoft wrote:
I agree on everything <...> of your post though... Channeling OatsmasterExpound. Channeling personalityMost of us are trying to simulate our personalities. Why so too eager to white knight Iamp/Yamato. ![[image loading]](http://thedubaipie.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/white-knight-chronicles-089-1248977563.jpg) On March 10 2013 22:25 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
I do not use the word expound.
Mocsta start playing the damn game.
What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv.
Who is your top scumread.
Stop being stupid: you use expound all the time. Half the thread hasn't posted, and its all talking shit. If you want a top read so far: iamp post reads like the most bullshit to me - lists half the player list and says: "a scum must be there"... no shit sherlock Ver; made one post and its dumb as fuck, and so what? Maybe its a forced personality post? What more is there to make of it then that? Sounds to me like you know something I don't, or something? Expound. On March 10 2013 22:26 Mocsta wrote:Yeah, yamato done nothing special and you giving him a town read. Way too eager. On March 10 2013 22:35 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:30 supersoft wrote:On March 10 2013 22:26 Mocsta wrote:On March 10 2013 22:22 supersoft wrote:
are you talking to me? Yeah, yamato done nothing special and you giving him a town read. Way too eager. i am not explaining my townreads right now. you explain me why yamato is scum if you think so. I dont need you to explain townreads. yam isnt scum or town for me. hes still sitting at null. 0 points for him, 0 points for you.
Really? Oatsmaster thinks that's not "spammy" or "jovial," and that it's different enough from mocsta's jovial and spammy meta to earn a vote? I don't buy it. Then there's some stupid back and forth between oats and mocsta, and then oats goes on to looking at other stuff.
But look at the difference between how oats interacted with suspicion on iamperfection and suspicion on mocsta. He claimed that they were both not playing to their town metas, but whereas at the time iamperfection actually wasn't matching his meta, oats's portrayal of mocsta's behavior this game was both curt and inaccurate. Plus, iamperfection had the bad listy intro post, which oats also claimed he was suspicious of.
Then a bit later in the filter, we get this:
On March 10 2013 23:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Guys. Mocsta. Sheep me, lynch him 
nonono seriously? no explanation of how the actions in the thread since the initial vote influences the read? No explanation of why people should still be going after mocsta?
So what's the difference between iamperfection and mocsta? Well, simply put - one of them is a much easier target. Iamperfection does tend to attract some suspicion as town, so he's a safe target for dispersed suspicion, but he's better-known and more veteran than mocsta, and therefore more likely to be influential and a more dangerous target for scum to go all in on. Mocsta, on the other hand, is someone I've never heard of before and therefore a newer player, plus from his behavior this game he seems less focused and srsbsns than iamperfection in response to suspicion.
Exhibit Two: Scum Love To Give Good Advice To Town, But Hate To Follow It
This is something I started looking for in the couple of games before I stopped playing for a while. "advice posts", be they long or short, are easy for scum to do, as is complaining about how the town is behaving. However, when a townie gives advice or criticism to/of the town in general, it means they care enough about that particular issue or problem to try to get everyone to focus on it. That also means they'll be thinking about it in their own posts. Basically: Townies follow their own advice, scum don't.
We have Oats's very first post:
On March 10 2013 18:42 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 18:06 supersoft wrote:
Ver is probably claiming a certain personality. Yup. Although there has been absolute bullshit from the players so far. Seriously NOTHING except personal attacks and other annoying, non-alignment indicative scum. Iamp what are you doing after that ridiculous list post which says NOTHING?
Personal attacks bad, back-and-forth bad, non-alignment indicative stuff bad. Okay, those are all good things for townies to be thinking about. We can summarize this as "don't engage in personal bitchfights because they distract the thread and don't help demonstrate that you're town."
So how does Oats do putting his posts where his mouth is?
He starts off spamming around and not engaging the thread:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 10 2013 21:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
Lynch anyone who doesnt add anything to the thread in their opening post after like 7 pages of content.
New policy.
On March 10 2013 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:25 Mocsta wrote:On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
I do not use the word expound.
Mocsta start playing the damn game.
What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv.
Who is your top scumread.
Stop being stupid: you use expound all the time. Half the thread hasn't posted, and its all talking shit. If you want a top read so far: iamp post reads like the most bullshit to me - lists half the player list and says: "a scum must be there"... no shit sherlock Ver; made one post and its dumb as fuck, and so what? Maybe its a forced personality post? What more is there to make of it then that? Sounds to me like you know something I don't, or something? Expound. I dont see any questions here. This is not a question cause it doesnt ask ANYTHING. On March 10 2013 21:55 Oatsmaster wrote:Im gonna use this quote cause its awesome Show nested quote +On February 07 2013 08:29 VisceraEyes wrote:
Why aren't you doing shit? You can't be scared of NKs, it's like you don't give a fuck. And in my experience a Marv that doesn't give a fuck is a scum Marv ..and I hate scum. I FUCKING HATE SCUM Marv
Then he gets into a personal-attack bitchfight with mocsta
+ Show Spoiler +On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
I do not use the word expound.
Mocsta start playing the damn game.
What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv.
Who is your top scumread.
On March 10 2013 22:37 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah.
Where is the jovial mocsta that spams up half the thread.
Come on.
##Vote: Mocsta On March 10 2013 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:25 Mocsta wrote:On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
I do not use the word expound.
Mocsta start playing the damn game.
What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv.
Who is your top scumread.
Stop being stupid: you use expound all the time. Half the thread hasn't posted, and its all talking shit. If you want a top read so far: iamp post reads like the most bullshit to me - lists half the player list and says: "a scum must be there"... no shit sherlock Ver; made one post and its dumb as fuck, and so what? Maybe its a forced personality post? What more is there to make of it then that? Sounds to me like you know something I don't, or something? Expound. I dont see any questions here. This is not a question cause it doesnt ask ANYTHING. On March 10 2013 22:59 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:56 Mocsta wrote:On March 10 2013 22:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
I ask you, because I think its weird and odd and what you thought.,.. You are being prickly and defensive as shit.
Why?
Also Is A LOT of interest 1 question to 1 person? I dont think so.
If you haven't noticed. I am writing completely different. (- normally much more verbose) I am not matching the personality meta completely, but its quite a mind-set change for me. Whose your scummiest guy so far. Considering vote is on me, lets change to; whose your 2nd scummiest guy? Iamp. But again I said that already. Or you are scum Mocsta Dont give me shit about not matching your scum meta. Why is it such a big issue that Marv thinks you are telling supersoft how to play? On March 10 2013 22:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
I ask you, because I think its weird and odd and what you thought.,.. You are being prickly and defensive as shit.
Why?
Also Is A LOT of interest 1 question to 1 person? I dont think so.
Then there's some personal bitching at acro:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 10 2013 14:49 Ver wrote:
Howdy Gents!
I'm going for a little challenge this game and plan on winning the game without reading my role pm. As not even I will know my motivations, nobody else can judge me. Armed with this power I shall stop the town from becoming an idiocracy.
I'm also considering giving myself another Personality to assist my efforts in keeping the town in order. I'll keep you all updated. Only scum or Drazerk ever tries to pull this stunt. ##vote Ver Thats a horrible reason to think someone is scum. Seriously do you think he is serious? Also arent you of the opinion that vets shouldnt be lynched day 1 unless scum claim in thread? On March 10 2013 23:52 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:51 Acrofales wrote:On March 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 10 2013 23:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 10 2013 14:49 Ver wrote:
Howdy Gents!
I'm going for a little challenge this game and plan on winning the game without reading my role pm. As not even I will know my motivations, nobody else can judge me. Armed with this power I shall stop the town from becoming an idiocracy.
I'm also considering giving myself another Personality to assist my efforts in keeping the town in order. I'll keep you all updated. Only scum or Drazerk ever tries to pull this stunt. ##vote Ver Thats a horrible reason to think someone is scum. Seriously do you think he is serious? Also arent you of the opinion that vets shouldnt be lynched day 1 unless scum claim in thread? That's stupid. Ver dropped in to tell us he hasn't read his role pm. Now you can believe him, in which case he is probably worth keeping around. However the chance is bigger that he is NOT rping Drazerk and HAS read his pm. Now that means he is lying and giving himself an excuse to act any way he chooses. Who needs excuses like that? Scum. I was looking forward to playing with Ver, but if he's scum, we should kill him. Or he was kidding, and roleplaying. Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far?
And Kurumi
+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Kurumi,
You know Chez is actually useful as town right? On March 11 2013 00:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
Kurumi, do you actually have any reads? Or are you just intent on trolling the thread.
Then we get another piece of "town advice"
On March 11 2013 01:10 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote:
I'm pretty much with risk on this one. I have no idea what Acro thinks he's doing with this Ver stuff. Ver pretty explicitly said he wouldn't have much time for the game until Monday as well. And yet Acro actually has his vote on him; he wants to kill potentially one of town's strongest assets. I can't really tell if this makes Acro mafia or just very silly. Who is scum? No reads = scum.
Okay sure - if you aren't presenting and pushing your reads, then you're scum. Not always true but a completely valid way to play as town. If we combine that with Oatsmaster's earlier complaints about personal attacks and non-alignment-indicative fluff and bickering, we get a pretty strong philosophy of town play.
One that is absolutely nothing like how oatsmaster has been playing this game. Go back and look again at the posts I put in the spoilers above about him getting into personal bitchfights. There's the Mocsta stuff, where we learn that Oats "has a read" and that his read is "mocsta is scum because he's not jovial or spammy", followed by like five unnecessary other posts as Oats lets himself be drawn into you-said you-said with mocsta. But other than that one post, and one post where he says he has a read on iamperfection, what discussion of his reads do we get? What reads do we get at all, other than the two "scum reads" he made in like his first three posts based on the first few pages of the game? What interaction with all the new information that's come up in the thread?
What does Oats think about Kurumi and WBG? Given how much he wants substantive posts involving reads, you'd think he would have told us his reads on them at some point during the several posts he makes about them and aimed at them. But nope - we don't. In fact, he goes out of his way to avoid pointing to either of them as scum:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 01:32 yamato77 wrote:
My question wasn't stupid.
I feel like one of them is probably mafia, given the nature of their posting. One is almost assuredly hiding with the other in the "Chezinu" category of unreadable players.
It's a valid mafia strategy if we, as town, allow it. So what do you propose, how do you determine the scummyness of one over the other? Since you feel that both cant be mafia and one probably is. It is also a valid town strategy to avoid night kills.
His only "reads" are ill-thought out, ill-explained, and inconsistent.
He complains / gives advice about the prevalence of certain specific poor townplay practices, then engages in exactly those practices himself.
These are both characteristic scum behaviors and both have clear scum motivations.
Oatsmaster is scum.
##vote: Oatsmaster
|
On March 11 2013 03:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Nothing important going on in thread I see? Not surprised given the player list this game. Too many unskilled newbies.
Lynch Ver or sloosh. Guys are scrubs and mafia.
Very convincing. I can feel.the skill oozing from this post.
|
On March 11 2013 04:37 VisceraEyes wrote:
Agree with risk. SnB which do YOU think it is? What is your reasoning for making the choice you did?
Honestly, I hadn't really thought that much about it besides wanting to point it out as either a good or bad post.
That said, there's really like nothing else in his filter.
At least once Palmar's plan goes bust, he usually jumps into taking the game seriously. Assuming he's gotten past his regular troll phase. SuperSoft hasn't done that. He also only has town reads, and he's clearly been following the thread closely enough to comment on which posts other people have been talking about (ex:
On March 10 2013 23:10 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 10 2013 14:49 Ver wrote:
Howdy Gents!
I'm going for a little challenge this game and plan on winning the game without reading my role pm. As not even I will know my motivations, nobody else can judge me. Armed with this power I shall stop the town from becoming an idiocracy.
I'm also considering giving myself another Personality to assist my efforts in keeping the town in order. I'll keep you all updated. Only scum or Drazerk ever tries to pull this stunt. ##vote Ver read the thread. Risk already quoted "notchezinu" (that was GMarshals smurf, right?)
)
Ooh ooh and I just saw this:
[QUOTE]On March 11 2013 03:44 supersoft wrote:
[QUOTE]On March 11 2013 03:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
Ah man wtf that didn't answer my question at all but I still loved that post X(
WHO IS THIS GUY?![/QUOTE]
you shoulnd't ask yourself that question. The proper question is, are his reads reasonable or not.[/QUOTE
woo, giving advice and not following it! This is a decent paradigm! But he himself has no reads except town reads and
[QUOTE]On March 10 2013 22:30 supersoft wrote:
[QUOTE]On March 10 2013 22:26 Mocsta wrote:
[QUOTE]On March 10 2013 22:22 supersoft wrote:
are you talking to me?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, yamato done nothing special and you giving him a town read. Way too eager.[/QUOTE]
i am not explaining my townreads right now. you explain me why yamato is scum if you think so.[/QUOTE]
All that said, I still am willing to give him leeway if this bad-plan-thing turns out to be roleplaying, or if his play veers towards the townie in the future.
So the answer to your question, VE, is: Right now I'm leaning scum on him, but I feel better about my oatsmaster case so I'm sticking to that.
|
the only roleplay i do, is keeping calm when you dare to call my plans bad :-)
|
Fixed the quotes
On March 11 2013 05:09 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 04:37 VisceraEyes wrote:
Agree with risk. SnB which do YOU think it is? What is your reasoning for making the choice you did? Honestly, I hadn't really thought that much about it besides wanting to point it out as either a good or bad post. That said, there's really like nothing else in his filter. At least once Palmar's plan goes bust, he usually jumps into taking the game seriously. Assuming he's gotten past his regular troll phase. SuperSoft hasn't done that. He also only has town reads, and he's clearly been following the thread closely enough to comment on which posts other people have been talking about Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:10 supersoft wrote:On March 10 2013 23:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 10 2013 14:49 Ver wrote:
Howdy Gents!
I'm going for a little challenge this game and plan on winning the game without reading my role pm. As not even I will know my motivations, nobody else can judge me. Armed with this power I shall stop the town from becoming an idiocracy.
I'm also considering giving myself another Personality to assist my efforts in keeping the town in order. I'll keep you all updated. Only scum or Drazerk ever tries to pull this stunt. ##vote Ver read the thread. Risk already quoted "notchezinu" (that was GMarshals smurf, right?) Ooh ooh and I just saw this: Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 03:44 supersoft wrote:On March 11 2013 03:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
Ah man wtf that didn't answer my question at all but I still loved that post X(
WHO IS THIS GUY?! you shoulnd't ask yourself that question. The proper question is, are his reads reasonable or not. woo, giving advice and not following it! This is a decent paradigm! But he himself has no reads except town reads and Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:30 supersoft wrote:On March 10 2013 22:26 Mocsta wrote:On March 10 2013 22:22 supersoft wrote:
are you talking to me? Yeah, yamato done nothing special and you giving him a town read. Way too eager. i am not explaining my townreads right now. you explain me why yamato is scum if you think so. All that said, I still am willing to give him leeway if this bad-plan-thing turns out to be roleplaying, or if his play veers towards the townie in the future. So the answer to your question, VE, is: Right now I'm leaning scum on him, but I feel better about my oatsmaster case so I'm sticking to that.
|
On March 11 2013 04:59 Crossfire99 wrote:Yo, be easy and stop buggin folks. True, dis game be tight, but we don't want dis gettin outta hand and turnin into beef. Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 03:01 HiroPro wrote:
yo, unless one of them admits they were lying right now, we should be lynching between kurumi and bugs today. both of them have claimed chezinu - bugs's anagram is a an anagram for brown brotherhood.
at the moment, i'm leaning towards kurumi. in particular notice what kurumi says after he has gotten his role (but before his alignment), "this sucks". kurumi is a player who likes to play around and troll frequently. it's very unlikely that he would be unhappy about receiving chezinu as a role. the logical conclusion is that kurumi is a faker.
##Vote Kurumi
also to the people who don't understand why i would ask everyone to just flat out say who they are. this is in part because my personality dislikes shennanies like what's going on right now. it's not something that i care about personally much. Aight, I'mma lay dis down fo yo. Votin for non-alignment reasons be wack. Na mean? Role playin be dope and errbody should be crunk bout it.
man what are you talking about. it's not about kurumi roleplaying. it's about the fact that he was lying about who he was. he has admitted that he was lying so it looks a little better than if he tried to go with what risk.nuke came up with. but there is a clear mafia motivation in trying to fake a hard-to-read personality like Chezinu.
|
On March 11 2013 05:13 supersoft wrote:
the only roleplay i do, is keeping calm when you dare to call my plans bad :-)
hey if i'm willing to call palmar's plans bad you better believe i dare to do it to you 
ALSO: is anyone else kinda worried that kita's smurf was "lynched" instead of killed by mafia, and that this is day 2? I feel like there might be something significant going on there, because kita actually went so far as to put his smurf into the player list.
|
[QUOTE]On March 11 2013 02:46 wherebugsgo wrote:
[QUOTE]On March 11 2013 02:22 prplhz wrote:
Kurumi's personality is Chezinu.
wherebugsgo's personality is Kurumi who is always acting Chezinuish anyway.
I solved it.[/QUOTE]
the chicken has pondered, but it seems the result is the product of the ingestion of feces.
As the dog it is my duty to lead the sheep away from danger, but the shepherd must know. Look at me, master. I will point you in the right direction.
I see bugs thinks it is the New Years
but his posting, in me, instils fear.
This bugs is useless and dumb
his posts do not attempt to find scum;
this man does not deserve to be here.
I say our WBG is corrupted
his blood, when it flows, will be red.
I say we must hang him,
many people harangue him.
He should end up dead.
So I lay down my vote to elect this thug
though I've read the thread slow as a slug,
for the moment I think he is our best flip
this man is scum, though he hasn't scum-slipped.
So for now I say ##Vote: Bugs
|
On March 11 2013 02:46 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 02:22 prplhz wrote:
Kurumi's personality is Chezinu.
wherebugsgo's personality is Kurumi who is always acting Chezinuish anyway.
I solved it. the chicken has pondered, but it seems the result is the product of the ingestion of feces. As the dog it is my duty to lead the sheep away from danger, but the shepherd must know. Look at me, master. I will point you in the right direction.
I see bugs thinks it is the New Years
but his posting, in me, instils fear.
This bugs is useless and dumb
his posts do not attempt to find scum;
this man does not deserve to be here.
I say our WBG is corrupted
his blood, when it flows, will be red.
I say we must hang him,
many people harangue him.
He should end up dead.
So I lay down my vote to elect this thug
though I've read the thread slow as a slug,
for the moment I think he is our best flip
this man is scum, though he hasn't scum-slipped.
So for now I say ##Vote: Bugs
|
Prom: would you say that Ver appears to be looking for scum?
|
hello Ace. Would you like to give me your diary?
I can give you a taste of my broth in return. I promise it will taste good.
|
On March 11 2013 04:59 Crossfire99 wrote:Yo, be easy and stop buggin folks. True, dis game be tight, but we don't want dis gettin outta hand and turnin into beef. Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 03:01 HiroPro wrote:
yo, unless one of them admits they were lying right now, we should be lynching between kurumi and bugs today. both of them have claimed chezinu - bugs's anagram is a an anagram for brown brotherhood.
at the moment, i'm leaning towards kurumi. in particular notice what kurumi says after he has gotten his role (but before his alignment), "this sucks". kurumi is a player who likes to play around and troll frequently. it's very unlikely that he would be unhappy about receiving chezinu as a role. the logical conclusion is that kurumi is a faker.
##Vote Kurumi
also to the people who don't understand why i would ask everyone to just flat out say who they are. this is in part because my personality dislikes shennanies like what's going on right now. it's not something that i care about personally much. Aight, I'mma lay dis down fo yo. Votin for non-alignment reasons be wack. Na mean? Role playin be dope and errbody should be crunk bout it.
Hello Crossfire99!
What do you think about my question I asked mods earlier?
They don't like me because I called them an Evil Clan.
And sent them fifty private messages because they did not respond...
|
On March 11 2013 05:14 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 04:59 Crossfire99 wrote:Yo, be easy and stop buggin folks. True, dis game be tight, but we don't want dis gettin outta hand and turnin into beef. On March 11 2013 03:01 HiroPro wrote:
yo, unless one of them admits they were lying right now, we should be lynching between kurumi and bugs today. both of them have claimed chezinu - bugs's anagram is a an anagram for brown brotherhood.
at the moment, i'm leaning towards kurumi. in particular notice what kurumi says after he has gotten his role (but before his alignment), "this sucks". kurumi is a player who likes to play around and troll frequently. it's very unlikely that he would be unhappy about receiving chezinu as a role. the logical conclusion is that kurumi is a faker.
##Vote Kurumi
also to the people who don't understand why i would ask everyone to just flat out say who they are. this is in part because my personality dislikes shennanies like what's going on right now. it's not something that i care about personally much. Aight, I'mma lay dis down fo yo. Votin for non-alignment reasons be wack. Na mean? Role playin be dope and errbody should be crunk bout it. man what are you talking about. it's not about kurumi roleplaying. it's about the fact that he was lying about who he was. he has admitted that he was lying so it looks a little better than if he tried to go with what risk.nuke came up with. but there is a clear mafia motivation in trying to fake a hard-to-read personality like Chezinu.
Just cause he be fakin jacks don't mean he scum. Role aint got nutin to do wit alignment. Judge 'im on if he bring dat bling (Chez brings da bling when he be from our hood and go off on dem scum). No bling, call da po-po, lock 'im in da joint, and give 'im dat needle.
|
On March 11 2013 05:23 wherebugsgo wrote:
hello Ace. Would you like to give me your diary?
I can give you a taste of my broth in return. I promise it will taste good.
ROLE FISHING ALERT
ALERT ALERT ALERT
|
On March 11 2013 01:33 Kurumi wrote:
If a fish caught another fish using a hook, does the first fish turn into a man?
Obviously, that fish got popped because he got snitched on. An' yo know how i like to get buck wild on snitches wit my shank.
|
On March 11 2013 05:18 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 02:46 wherebugsgo wrote:On March 11 2013 02:22 prplhz wrote:
Kurumi's personality is Chezinu.
wherebugsgo's personality is Kurumi who is always acting Chezinuish anyway.
I solved it. the chicken has pondered, but it seems the result is the product of the ingestion of feces. As the dog it is my duty to lead the sheep away from danger, but the shepherd must know. Look at me, master. I will point you in the right direction. I see bugs thinks it is the New Years but his posting, in me, instils fear. This bugs is useless and dumb his posts do not attempt to find scum; this man does not deserve to be here. I say our WBG is corrupted his blood, when it flows, will be red. I say we must hang him, many people harangue him. He should end up dead. So I lay down my vote to elect this thug though I've read the thread slow as a slug, for the moment I think he is our best flip this man is scum, though he hasn't scum-slipped. So for now I say ##Vote: Bugs
some people say that the greatest gift one can give is life. Sadly I do not have the means to do so, but I can give you the second greatest gift one can give: a rat.
Wait that's not right. Who the hell wrote this drivel? I'm gonna go fire that guy right now.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hello, brother Promethelax. I see that you have met my friend, the honorable George. Sadly George is a bit preoccupied at the moment-he seems to be pondering the question of whether the fish and the human can coexist peacefully. Quite a quirky fellow, really. On good days he most certainly is high-functioning, but as his gardener can attest, we really do not know what goes on inside that cranium of his.
I do have to say to you though: is our townies learning?
Damn it who brought him back?!
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Welcome, comrade. Have you looked at the rat yet? It's quacking pretty loudly, wouldn't you say? We should band together, you know. Otherwise I might be given the impression that you are the mole in the group. We all know that, though the mole is weaker than the rat, it is hated much more severely.
So the questions to ask you are: are you the mole? Or perhaps you are the disease of the rat? Or a fat lazy cat?
From my first impression you certainly don't seem like my friend the shepherd!
|
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting?
|
On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting?
Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of?
What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"?
|
On March 11 2013 02:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
LOL this game. Vivax maybe you can explain what about that post you didn't like? Maybe explain why it's scummy and why you want to lynch me? Yamato is just butthurt that I found him so fast, but what's your excuse?
There is no excuse I just think it's scummy (you say yamato wants to pressure lurkers just to look like contributing and I did the same but you didn't attack me for it, sooooo...) by the way why did you call it excuse do you think I'm scum faking something? Cause it wouldn't make any sense for me to be pretending something when I just expressed my interest into lynching you
Anyway I would also be happy to lynch those people speaking in riddles regardless of them roleplaying someone to force them to post something more meaningful regardless of the roleplaying. Yes it would be a policy lynch (duh) but I would like other townies to agree with me on trying to make them post something useful and not just this weird stuff (Even if you roleplay you should show that you're taking a pro-town direction with it). I'm just not sure who I would prefer out of Kurumi or Bugs yet :/ , Bugs seems rather willing to call others scum with his riddling though so it's probably Kurumi as first choice.
There's also another guy I find suspicious but I'll see how he performs before calling him out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
