|
On February 28 2013 09:36 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I'll be making a case later for vigilantes to nightkill layabout, if my reads are correct. JungleJorge must be the next to die by the lynch or from a dayvig. I can think of absolutely no other reason for his behavior. Don't be dumb
|
Y are u dodging my challenge milkman.
This is now the fourth timr i am asking for u to back up ur statement macho is easy to read.
Again. Who is macho top 2 scum reads...
|
I checked fruity again, you were indeed something along 6th or 7th voting for yamato Toad. Your version also coincides with what I see in your filter.
Can we now finally go on to discuss tomorrow's lynches? I suggest Hassy for now for avoiding to give an opinion at all. JJ gives me doubts since his defence of Prom was pretty bold and I can't imagine mafia actually playing that badly, so I'll wait to see what he brings to the table in the future.
|
I don't give a shit who is claiming credit. Everyone can ignore Toadesstern's bloviating about confirmed townies or whatever he thinks is going on. For now, there is no reason for us to be patting ourselves on the back and handing out town awards to anybody. Already we're talking about sheeping? Get a grip, town. What matters now is who dies next, not who gets credit for this.
|
On February 28 2013 09:36 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I'll be making a case later for vigilantes to nightkill layabout, if my reads are correct. JungleJorge must be the next to die by the lynch or from a dayvig. I can think of absolutely no other reason for his behavior. Well, JungleJorge's plan reminds me about one of my crapshoot plays in my early days but... Well, it was too abstract and wrong. Like I am not going to stop you, but I think we might have better alternatives. Just a gut I feel somewhere. As for layabout, as a person who played with him and things did get tense in the past in the games we played I am not that sold he is Mafia, but I'd be glad to read your case and talk about my doubts then, so we have something concrete to talk about.
|
On February 28 2013 09:39 Vivax wrote: I checked fruity again, you were indeed something along 6th or 7th voting for yamato Toad. Your version also coincides with what I see in your filter.
Can we now finally go on to discuss tomorrow's lynches? I suggest Hassy for now for avoiding to give an opinion at all. JJ gives me doubts since his defence of Prom was pretty bold and I can't imagine mafia actually playing that badly, so I'll wait to see what he brings to the table in the future. if anything Hassy is a potential vig candidate, not a lynch candidate. Though again I'm actually quite confident that at least one of Macho+Grush is mafia, probably both which doesn't leave that many mafias and there still has to be a vet within team mafia.
|
Toad... The day vig request is pointless. Thy cant shoot day1
Having said that i find it unlikely u put him under that pressure day1 as scum. Not impossible though. Same goes to Ve. His uncertainty end of lynch was terribad
toad. Im still waiting for three reasons for grush to be scum
|
Milksuckler, as for Macho I said he is easy to read in that regard that what he has in his posts are his thoughts. I never said or even implied to know what is going in his head. He only said he is suspicious of me and his read on vivax started turning green, then he backed up VE on his Hassybaby reading observation and disappeared. Maybe I could have worded that better, but still, he is not speaking in riddles or gunning for some extravagant plans. I find his absence worrying, if that matters.
|
On February 28 2013 09:43 Mocsta wrote: Toad... The day vig request is pointless. Thy cant shoot day1
Having said that i find it unlikely u put him under that pressure day1 as scum. Not impossible though. Same goes to Ve. His uncertainty end of lynch was terribad
toad. Im still waiting for three reasons for grush to be scum Yeah sorry I didn't know dayvigs can't shoot d1. Someone pointed that out later on, though you can believe me I tried to get him shot data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
About grush I only have one and it's a pretty good one; he's not town.
|
On February 28 2013 09:42 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2013 09:39 Vivax wrote: I checked fruity again, you were indeed something along 6th or 7th voting for yamato Toad. Your version also coincides with what I see in your filter.
Can we now finally go on to discuss tomorrow's lynches? I suggest Hassy for now for avoiding to give an opinion at all. JJ gives me doubts since his defence of Prom was pretty bold and I can't imagine mafia actually playing that badly, so I'll wait to see what he brings to the table in the future. if anything Hassy is a potential vig candidate, not a lynch candidate. Though again I'm actually quite confident that at least one of Macho+Grush is mafia, probably both which doesn't leave that many mafias and there still has to be a vet within team mafia. Well that vet point is a little moot given smurfs.
|
1) Prom labeled him as confTown D1 because of "Starsenses" 2) Grush was egging me on to lynch Toadesstern end of day. 3) His contributions are laughable (though this is null as it's grush, but taken with other things)
|
Milkman im still waiting. Ur responding to everything else
This constant dodging is looking suspicious as fuck now...
|
K bad timing. Sorry milkman
|
On February 28 2013 09:46 VisceraEyes wrote: 1) Prom labeled him as confTown D1 because of "Starsenses" 2) Grush was egging me on to lynch Toadesstern end of day. 3) His contributions are laughable (though this is null as it's grush, but taken with other things) Didnt realise u were smurfing as toad...
|
On February 28 2013 09:47 Mocsta wrote: K bad timing. Sorry milkman I want the suckler back.
|
|
On February 28 2013 09:46 The Milkman wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2013 09:42 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2013 09:39 Vivax wrote: I checked fruity again, you were indeed something along 6th or 7th voting for yamato Toad. Your version also coincides with what I see in your filter.
Can we now finally go on to discuss tomorrow's lynches? I suggest Hassy for now for avoiding to give an opinion at all. JJ gives me doubts since his defence of Prom was pretty bold and I can't imagine mafia actually playing that badly, so I'll wait to see what he brings to the table in the future. if anything Hassy is a potential vig candidate, not a lynch candidate. Though again I'm actually quite confident that at least one of Macho+Grush is mafia, probably both which doesn't leave that many mafias and there still has to be a vet within team mafia. Well that vet point is a little moot given smurfs. host knows about smurfs, doesn't he? Unless you're telling me we shouldn't lynch into vets because of vets because I totally agree with that.
|
On February 28 2013 09:50 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2013 09:46 The Milkman wrote:On February 28 2013 09:42 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2013 09:39 Vivax wrote: I checked fruity again, you were indeed something along 6th or 7th voting for yamato Toad. Your version also coincides with what I see in your filter.
Can we now finally go on to discuss tomorrow's lynches? I suggest Hassy for now for avoiding to give an opinion at all. JJ gives me doubts since his defence of Prom was pretty bold and I can't imagine mafia actually playing that badly, so I'll wait to see what he brings to the table in the future. if anything Hassy is a potential vig candidate, not a lynch candidate. Though again I'm actually quite confident that at least one of Macho+Grush is mafia, probably both which doesn't leave that many mafias and there still has to be a vet within team mafia. Well that vet point is a little moot given smurfs. host knows about smurfs, doesn't he? Unless you're telling me we shouldn't lynch into vets because of smurfs because I totally agree with that. EBWOP changes in bold.
|
Fuckn phone auto log in
will paste posts to my filter when i get back to comp
|
On February 28 2013 09:49 VisceraEyes wrote: *shrug* Pls expound why ur point 1 is indicative of scum
|
|
|
|