Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVII - Page 45

On February 13 2013 10:07 cDgCorazon wrote:


Hey guess what, we didn't "lynch a loud voce" and he flipped town...

On February 13 2013 10:07 warbaby wrote:


I never said I thought he was town, I said I didn't think he was scum. My read wasn't any better than null, in the post I linked earlier. You insinuating I called him town is putting WIFOM into my mouth, which is not what I said.

One of the people that lynched glurio is scum. I refuse to believe 3 towns lynched him. We need to focus on:

Sevryn
Mocsta
cdgCorazon

And perhaps we can find a scum. It's fine if you guys still want to make cases on me, but I didn't just lynch a townie.

Sevryn seems the most questionable. He really needs to post a lot more to show he's not a lurky scum.

On February 13 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:

Uh...glurio was plenty loud right at the end with his ass on the line.

On February 13 2013 10:09 Mocsta wrote:

True, i just read the post again; sorry for the misrepresentation.
That you stood up for me, made me think you thought he was town.
Not sure why you would step in to defend a "null' read; even now with hindsight, thats an odd move to make.

On February 13 2013 10:14 warbaby wrote:


Because why would I lynch, or agree to the lynch of, someone I have a null read on, when there are lurkers like sylencia (at the time) and sevryn still in the game?

On February 13 2013 10:14 warbaby wrote:


Because why would I lynch, or agree to the lynch of, someone I have a null read on, when there are lurkers like sylencia (at the time) and sevryn still in the game?

I tried to debunk the wack "glurio is a blendy scum like last game" wagon, and failed. It's not that I thought he was town, it was that I thought he was going to be lynched for incorrect reasons, compared to the other candidates.

On February 13 2013 10:18 Mocsta wrote:

Right, so if I read right; it wasnt that you was sticking up for Glurio, it was that you wanted your wagon to take off (i.e Sylencia/Sevryn)

If so, I can accept that.

if you were sticking up for Glurio because he was null; thats really an odd thing to do (even with your explanation)

On February 13 2013 10:21 warbaby wrote:


I would have been happy with a wagon on sylencia or sevryn, or possibly zarepath and mandalor. I thought they were all potentially lurking harder/playing outside their normal town meta, moreso than glurio.

Sorry bud, you're the one on the wagon that just lynched a town, not me. I don't need to explain my D1 votes any more (I explained them when I made them, so just check my filter).

You need to explain your vote. You just lynched an active town player because you thought he was playing lurky scum like last game, no? But how can he be lurkier than players with 50% less posts?

On February 13 2013 10:30 Sn0_Man wrote:
This entire vote was so retarded. WoS: The fact that you literally threw away your vote with no regard for who got lynched makes me want to call you scum. UNFORTUNATELY, like 6 other people did the same thing (no I didn't count how many).

@Warbaby: If I was scum I'd be happy to laugh at retarded town who can't summon more than a 3-2-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 vote. There is no reason for any of them to be on glurio unless they either a) felt the need to save sevryn (aka sevryn is scum, kinda lines up with his vote) or b) they were afraid of people blaming them for throwing away their vote like what I just did to WoS. Dunno. That doesn't convince me that any of those 3 *must* be scum.

On February 13 2013 10:30 Sn0_Man wrote:
This entire vote was so retarded. WoS: The fact that you literally threw away your vote with no regard for who got lynched makes me want to call you scum. UNFORTUNATELY, like 6 other people did the same thing (no I didn't count how many).

On February 13 2013 10:39 Mocsta wrote:

Sn0

I am finding warbaby trying to fit in with town just not working for me.

I am more than happy for him to pursue this lead and pressure me (and the others).

I think it will lead to his undoing, and then hopefully you guys will see what I see.

---

I think debating on who scum voted for and why is just too much WIFOM, save it for after a flip is my opinion.

On February 13 2013 10:44 WaveofShadow wrote:

But you know what, sometimes it's necessary. We just flipped, let's talk about it Mocsta, and those who lynched our poor Glurio.

I honestly wish I were better at this game because I can't pick out scumroles/scumteam.
I could very easily see you and geript going at it and picking up opposite roles along with a lurker....ugh.
After my second midterm tomorrow and N1 I'll have more time to put into this and I'll try to come up with something.

The reason i think it is pointless is because, you go
"Assume Mocsta is scum"
He did X, Y, Z

Now, lets say the bandwagon builds up and you get my flip and realise its a mislynch;

then what?

You have wasted an entire cycle because of an "association"

On February 13 2013 10:47 ObviousOne wrote:
Hey guys! I have been reading the thread on-and-off but nothing resembling deep analysis yet since I wasn't anticipating replacing in. Spur of the moment decision to hop in. I'm considering it a personal challenge to myself to be the most active player at least for the night phase so I can get a better read on you as questions pop up during my read, and you can get a better read on me and my scum-hunting abilities.

That said, after saying hello here I need to sod off for a few hours. I'm about to run a raid so I'll be back in a bit to start my deep read.

On February 13 2013 10:55 Mocsta wrote:
I am about to do this myself, and will be looking for the following:

• why have no wagons taken off this Day1?
  
• How did we get to a situation where 5 or so people held 1/2 votes for a prolonged period of time.
  
• Did anyone create confusion in the middle of the cycle; perhaps allowing no consolidation to occur
  
• Did anyone push for a lynch by cheap bandwagoning; or shitty justifications to "blend in"