|
On February 13 2013 09:21 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 08:52 Mocsta wrote:
Sylencia
I just checked your filter
and noticed your recent posts are defensive (perhaps due to pressure you)
What I need from you to determine alignment is not a defense; but to see you scum hunt.
I could not find a vote in your filter.Please indicate who your top scum read, and dot point why. I've only checked a few filters unfortunately (bad play by me) but from those I've checked I'm going to still stick with my suspicion on Warbaby. I've tunneled on him a little bit too much though... - Firstly, I didn't read what happened in NMM36 - so I don't know what happened there though you guys seem to have pretty much filled me in on it anyways. - I did my analysis on him, and it feels like he's been aggressively trying to get me killed following it. There are other reasons he has given (lurker) but as Corazon has mentioned, there are a bunch of lurkers in this game and it is like I'm the target because I'm the one in that bunch who has targetted him. - Rather than vote for a player he considers to be scummy, he decides to simply follow a LAL policy - so either he's not willing to vote for the people he finds suspicious or he's not scum hunting but policy killing, and not scum hunting is exactly what he is accusing me of too.
Suspicion is not enough with 30 minutes to go. Wishy-washy up until the end is not going to earn you any friends with your neck on the line.
|
![[image loading]](https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/2752616335/4b3ae0f60a4556ba1b2b4088d779492b_normal.jpeg) Count Vote:
glurio (3): Sevryn, Mocsta, cDgCorazon
Sylencia (2): warbaby, Mandalor
WaveofShadow (1): geript
Macheji (1): WaveofShadow
Sevryn (1): Sn0_Man
Mandalor (1): zarepath
Not Voting (4): 9-BiT, Macheji, glurio, Sylencia
Currently, glurio is set to be lynched!
~half an hour remaining until deadline.
Remember you have to vote!
|
On February 13 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 09:21 Sylencia wrote:On February 13 2013 08:52 Mocsta wrote:
Sylencia
I just checked your filter
and noticed your recent posts are defensive (perhaps due to pressure you)
What I need from you to determine alignment is not a defense; but to see you scum hunt.
I could not find a vote in your filter.Please indicate who your top scum read, and dot point why. I've only checked a few filters unfortunately (bad play by me) but from those I've checked I'm going to still stick with my suspicion on Warbaby. I've tunneled on him a little bit too much though... - Firstly, I didn't read what happened in NMM36 - so I don't know what happened there though you guys seem to have pretty much filled me in on it anyways. - I did my analysis on him, and it feels like he's been aggressively trying to get me killed following it. There are other reasons he has given (lurker) but as Corazon has mentioned, there are a bunch of lurkers in this game and it is like I'm the target because I'm the one in that bunch who has targetted him. - Rather than vote for a player he considers to be scummy, he decides to simply follow a LAL policy - so either he's not willing to vote for the people he finds suspicious or he's not scum hunting but policy killing, and not scum hunting is exactly what he is accusing me of too. Suspicion is not enough with 30 minutes to go. Wishy-washy up until the end is not going to earn you any friends with your neck on the line.
No it will not, but as much as I would want to vote him - I might end up having to vote for my survival, since warbaby will not be gathering any votes.
|
On February 13 2013 09:10 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 09:02 zarepath wrote:
I'm short on time and, unfortunately, as thorough an analysis as I'd hoped. I will be voting for one of the following:
Sevryn, glurio, warbaby, Mandalor, Sylencia
Out of that list my order is (most scummy @ top) warbaby glurio mandalor sylencia/sevryn corazon couldnt get traction on warbaby, so i wont bother going there glurio has just been a slippery "tough mudler" all game. Why are you treating it as "town aligned" that he built a case because he was asked. Then he claims he built bullshit case to flush out scum; yet, this only came into light after zarepath expressed the same thing. corazon hit it on the nail; zarepath breadcrumbed, glurio didnt. Then he makes a list of lurkers for vote, and conveniently takes himself off the list as if his contributions have been pro-town; this reeks of scum trying to cling onto what ever wagon is taking off and not giving a two shits on who the vote is for Depending on how Glurio answers my question I addressed to him, I am seriously considering swapping my vote from Geript to him.
How is it your most scummy guy only gets mentioned once in your whole post (that is in the list you posted where he is #1)?
How is it syl is on the bottom of the list although you asked him to make a case and he didn't do it?
Why do you leave out more than half of my explanation out of your vote post?
Where is geript, the person you voted 47 hours of D1 for in that list, or sn0 who you had as most likely scum at some point of the game?
|
@WoS. If you look at my filter, I've been more active than just stating that I think WB is town. That's pretty straw man. Your case here is sounds like, "I'll show you mine if you show me yours." Quite frankly, I've seen nothing in your filter that seems more than active blending. I have previously noted a post I liked; I'm still not quite sure what to think of your long post and direct point to me yet. It's harder to read your emotions in the posts as there's a clear sense of frustration but I'm getting senses of undertones of something else I haven't yet identified.
Otherwise, if you have read my filter, then you would understand how I operate and where my thoughts are, where they have been and where they are going. If you think I haven't made adequate additions and won't be beneficial to the town, then voice that with your vote. It even appears that a few other people would be willing to join you.
Also, could someone tell me what FoS means as I haven't seen that previously.
As for sheep-able cases, I intend to address that during N1 as I will have adequate time to form a response.
|
On February 13 2013 09:23 cDgCorazon wrote:
@WoS Why in the world are you bringing this up now?
It's a hard decision for me to make (because there is nothing to choose from between the two). I'm guessing Mandalor's vote is just him not thinking.
Lynching Glurio would go a long way in either proving or disproving my case towards WB. His town claim is even stupider than WB's as well. There's not much else to say.
##Vote: Glurio
Wow great bandwagon vote right here.
Where would my lynch in any way prove or disprove your case of WB? Cause i said we should take a step back and look at the whole picture?
I still stand by we can't lynch a soft-claiming blue right now.
|
On February 13 2013 08:25 cDgCorazon wrote:
Fine. I'll back down.
##unvote
In the effort of choosing who to vote for, I'd like to point out that WB, Geript, and Glurio have not made any strong arguments against each other (and WB/Geript have explicitly said they don't think the other is scum/is town).
|
On February 13 2013 09:40 glurio wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 09:10 Mocsta wrote:On February 13 2013 09:02 zarepath wrote:
I'm short on time and, unfortunately, as thorough an analysis as I'd hoped. I will be voting for one of the following:
Sevryn, glurio, warbaby, Mandalor, Sylencia
Out of that list my order is (most scummy @ top) warbaby glurio mandalor sylencia/sevryn corazon couldnt get traction on warbaby, so i wont bother going there glurio has just been a slippery "tough mudler" all game. Why are you treating it as "town aligned" that he built a case because he was asked. If anything, thats NULL at best, scummy at worst. Then he claims he built bullshit case to flush out scum; yet, this only came into light after zarepath expressed the same thing. corazon hit it on the nail; zarepath breadcrumbed, glurio didnt. Again, NULL at best, scummy at worst. Then he makes a list of lurkers for vote, and conveniently takes himself off the list as if his contributions have been pro-town; this reeks of scum trying to cling onto what ever wagon is taking off and not giving a two shits on who the vote is for This is scummy at BEST, really scummy at worst. Depending on how Glurio answers my question I addressed to him, I am seriously considering swapping my vote from Geript to him. How is it your most scummy guy only gets mentioned once in your whole post (that is in the list you posted where he is #1)? How is it syl is on the bottom of the list although you asked him to make a case and he didn't do it? Why do you leave out more than half of my explanation out of your vote post? Where is geript, the person you voted 47 hours of D1 for in that list, or sn0 who you had as most likely scum at some point of the game?
Pretty simple.
i was responding to zarepath list of lurkers worth lynching
I want more activity from Sylencia; but I liked his reasoning on warbaby town claim WAY more than anything you have provided. I thought it was a good analysis/contribution
|
OK, the wagon on glurio is pretty wack IMO, and I don't like how sevryn is leading it without being present. Looking at sylencia's previous games, he has lurked like this as town before (maybe not quite as hard, but he's not a 1+ page per 24 hr type player, as town).
##vote: sevryn
Basically for the same reasons as my earlier vote on sylencia, except now sylencia is posting and sevryn still hasn't. And I think sevryn voting for glurio and then taking off past deadline is just wack. And then glurio getting wagoned, I don't like that. I don't think glurio is lurking as bad as he did as scum last game.
I really wish glurio would cast a vote, though. I'm surprised he's holding off for this long.
|
You aren't helping yourself glurio.
I think I may be willing to vote Sylencia, but my read on him is Blue or Scum, not green. I read somewhere that people who seem withdrawn and preoccupied with blue roles (like Syl was when we talked about WB's pseudo-blue claim) are often blue themselves. (Somewhere is in Ver's analysis of XXX). I really didn't want to lynch Syl because he might flip blue but his contributions haven't really been in line with what I would hope a town member would try to bring to the table.
So basically, I'm willing to consolidate on Syl but I want you guys to understand the risk that he flips blue is decently high IMO.
|
Agh I write my thoughts during a slow period and 5 posts pop up :O
|
I'm not going to vote for Syl because I think WB is scum and he has been trying to get us to lynch Syl for at least 12 hours. It wouldn't make sense for me to vote for my top scumread's scum read (Mandalor would you like to exhibit this logic as well?).
|
On February 13 2013 09:43 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 08:25 cDgCorazon wrote:
Fine. I'll back down.
##unvote
In the effort of choosing who to vote for, I'd like to point out that WB, Geript, and Glurio have not made any strong arguments against each other (and WB/Geript have explicitly said they don't think the other is scum/is town).
I also didn't made strong arguments against zare, WoS, You, Syl, Sev, macheji and 9.
How is that helpful?
|
##Vote: Cora
For blatant sheeping.
|
I have an interesting post all ready to go, but I just don't think I can pull the trigger.
|
You think wb is scum and you are not voting for him? How does that make sense?
|
On February 13 2013 09:43 warbaby wrote:
OK, the wagon on glurio is pretty wack IMO,
With reasoning like that, i could think you're not voting for Glurio because I am.
Come on, if you want to be pro-town, stimulate discussion, walk me through why my reasoning is wack
|
On February 13 2013 09:46 glurio wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 09:43 cDgCorazon wrote:On February 13 2013 08:25 cDgCorazon wrote:
Fine. I'll back down.
##unvote
In the effort of choosing who to vote for, I'd like to point out that WB, Geript, and Glurio have not made any strong arguments against each other (and WB/Geript have explicitly said they don't think the other is scum/is town).
I also didn't made strong arguments against zare, WoS, You, Syl, Sev, macheji and 9. How is that helpful?
It's just me theorycrafting. It's what you need to do when there's nothing to choose from between two people.
It's not just your actions, it's also the fact that the two people I've made cases against haven't gone after each other and you, and the fact that you haven't gone after them. All three of you have been under fire D1, yet none of you have been targeted by the other two. Strange?
|
On February 13 2013 09:47 glurio wrote:
##Vote: Cora
For blatant sheeping.
OMGUS.
|
On February 13 2013 09:43 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 09:40 glurio wrote:On February 13 2013 09:10 Mocsta wrote:On February 13 2013 09:02 zarepath wrote:
I'm short on time and, unfortunately, as thorough an analysis as I'd hoped. I will be voting for one of the following:
Sevryn, glurio, warbaby, Mandalor, Sylencia
Out of that list my order is (most scummy @ top) warbaby glurio mandalor sylencia/sevryn corazon couldnt get traction on warbaby, so i wont bother going there glurio has just been a slippery "tough mudler" all game. Why are you treating it as "town aligned" that he built a case because he was asked. If anything, thats NULL at best, scummy at worst. Then he claims he built bullshit case to flush out scum; yet, this only came into light after zarepath expressed the same thing. corazon hit it on the nail; zarepath breadcrumbed, glurio didnt. Again, NULL at best, scummy at worst. Then he makes a list of lurkers for vote, and conveniently takes himself off the list as if his contributions have been pro-town; this reeks of scum trying to cling onto what ever wagon is taking off and not giving a two shits on who the vote is for This is scummy at BEST, really scummy at worst. Depending on how Glurio answers my question I addressed to him, I am seriously considering swapping my vote from Geript to him. How is it your most scummy guy only gets mentioned once in your whole post (that is in the list you posted where he is #1)? How is it syl is on the bottom of the list although you asked him to make a case and he didn't do it? Why do you leave out more than half of my explanation out of your vote post? Where is geript, the person you voted 47 hours of D1 for in that list, or sn0 who you had as most likely scum at some point of the game? Pretty simple. i was responding to zarepath list of lurkers worth lynching I want more activity from Sylencia; but I liked his reasoning on warbaby town claim WAY more than anything you have provided. I thought it was a good analysis/contribution
Still nothing about warbaby being on top of the list and you saying nothing on him AGAIN, even after calling you out on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
