Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVII - Page 40

On February 13 2013 08:29 Sn0_Man wrote:
Personally, I think that your vote on geript looks dumb moc. I've already stated this but cmon. He legitimately dislikes you due at least in part to your play so far. He makes a case on you that I really don't think is illegitimate, although I think you are town (the case isn't retarded, although it isn't strong either). The fact that you already have him and warbaby as a scumteam rings alarm bells to me because you should know that association cases day 1 pre-flip are NUTSO BAD.

As such, I request that you MOVE your vote to something that town can agree upon. If you think that sevryn is not scum, and would prefer to lynch glurio (OR SOME OTHER REAL CANDIDATE WITH REASONS) let me know.

Thx.

I answered previously that I can see why you think it is association.
If it was, I would be voting warbaby > geript as first link.

he could have defended a scum buddy or a town guy for cred.
His choice to chainsaw was suboptimal and is a very scummy action in general

On February 13 2013 08:31 cDgCorazon wrote:


Why are you expecting him to change his vote?

In my opinion, WB is kind of locked into Sylencia because it's the only person he has really targeted...

On February 13 2013 08:36 Sn0_Man wrote:
Either way, if you want to lynch "blendy active" then lynch WoS imo.

Buuuuut I really would rather lynch lurkers. They have equal or greater chance of being scum anyway.

On February 13 2013 08:36 Sn0_Man wrote:
Either way, if you want to lynch "blendy active" then lynch WoS imo.

Buuuuut I really would rather lynch lurkers. They have equal or greater chance of being scum anyway.

On February 13 2013 08:44 WaveofShadow wrote:
Come to think of it I'm not sure why I even responded since I'm in no danger of being lynched.
Glurio and Sylencia you have an hour left. Care to defend yourselves at all or make some sort of a case?
I have no hope for Sevryn at this point.

On February 13 2013 08:45 Mocsta wrote:

I dont think either of them will be present right now due to timezones.

Fingers crossed they are here before the lynch but.

On February 13 2013 08:36 Sylencia wrote:
Now I'm seeing two reasons why I'm being voted here:
- The fact I'm quiet is apparently like the way I played when I was scum (wrong when you compare it to my other games, I was a bit more active during that game but still rather quiet in comparison to the number of players )
- The fact I'm quiet is uncharacteristic (also wrong, look at NMM32/33)

The points are kind of contradictory though...

On February 13 2013 08:47 warbaby wrote:


Sylencia posted like 10 minutes ago. Are you confusing him with sevryn?

On February 13 2013 08:47 geript wrote:
Point out what you'd like. I haven't made a case against many people; neither, iirc, have I weighed in on 0 post non-participant vs low count lurker. Those facts are hardly relevant.

I'd point out that no one has really made a case against you at all. As far as I see it, your agenda has been to make the town atmosphere negative. Yes, it takes two to get into a flame war and I'm not giving war baby any credit avoiding those spats either. In the least Mocsta has shown that he's willing to listen, even though I think his vote for me is weak at best. You on the other hand have tunnel visioned on your target of the moment at each point. Scum hunting is fine and being aggressive is fine. But the belligerent tone you've taken at many points, especially over exceptionally minor things, isn't beneficial to the town. Rather, it seems to me like you want everyone to spend their time scrutinizing your target so that they avoid you entirely. Your "We haven't gotten scum day 1 lynching lurkers, so lets try a new tack" comment from a while back (would quote but still on phone) keeps on sounding like "Let's lynch a loud voice" to me. In my experience the louder voices are almost always town; I even think one of the guides says something similar.

Now you're going to ask why I'm not voting for you (likely), but I still think that you're misguided right now and not an active dissident. So my vote remains in place for right now.

On February 13 2013 08:47 geript wrote:
Point out what you'd like. I haven't made a case against many people; neither, iirc, have I weighed in on 0 post non-participant vs low count lurker. Those facts are hardly relevant.

I'd point out that no one has really made a case against you at all. As far as I see it, your agenda has been to make the town atmosphere negative. Yes, it takes two to get into a flame war and I'm not giving war baby any credit avoiding those spats either. In the least Mocsta has shown that he's willing to listen, even though I think his vote for me is weak at best. You on the other hand have tunnel visioned on your target of the moment at each point. Scum hunting is fine and being aggressive is fine. But the belligerent tone you've taken at many points, especially over exceptionally minor things, isn't beneficial to the town. Rather, it seems to me like you want everyone to spend their time scrutinizing your target so that they avoid you entirely. Your "We haven't gotten scum day 1 lynching lurkers, so lets try a new tack" comment from a while back (would quote but still on phone) keeps on sounding like "Let's lynch a loud voice" to me. In my experience the louder voices are almost always town; I even think one of the guides says something similar.

Now you're going to ask why I'm not voting for you (likely), but I still think that you're misguided right now and not an active dissident. So my vote remains in place for right now.

On February 13 2013 08:50 cDgCorazon wrote:


Please explain to me why being aggressive is scummy.

If we're going to keep thinking that all "loud voices" are town, at least one scum is going to slip by for a long time.
Take a look at my scum play from NMM XXXIII. Why do you think I got away with being scum for so long? Because I was active and looking pro-town.

If we take out a scum with a "loud voice" now, our chances of winning go way up.

On February 13 2013 08:51 glurio wrote:
I'm back, with the current events i'd much rather vote for Mandalor then for sevryn. Mandalor kinda just hopped on syls wagon, while sevryn at least had the guts to vote for someone who didn't have a vote so far and wasn't really in the spotlight.
That's something i wouldn't expect from scum.

On February 12 2013 14:41 Mocsta wrote:
Heck even sevryn had the balls to bust in over the top of you guys and give an opinion.

On February 13 2013 08:05 Mocsta wrote:

Glurio

Please detail why YOUR contributions are better than the three people listed above.

I am shocked that you would turn your back on your own kind; because as far as I am concerned:

YOU are a lurker, which is what I believe you are nominating the above three for.

*ironic* is it not?