I can't say, the VE lynch feels wrong. Snarfs has gone for too long and his actions don't make sense from a townie point of view. VE seems sincere in his last posts after my case (not the ones he's capslocking), but his scum play can be pretty good too I think?

Fuck, I don't know what I should do.

I need a break. be back in 10.

Yeah, looks like the typicial scum 180 in order to get on a scum lynch.

On February 13 2013 08:03 slOosh wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yes, because town is in such an awesome position that we are choosing between two scum candidates, and scum aren't doing anything about it.

By virtue of phagga and prplhz,
##Vote: Snarfs

So you think that Prp is scum slOosh?
And what is your read on phagga

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 02:27 GMT

#1364

nah I dont think jay is scum, because of how hard he pushed VE. HOWEVER its possible for scum to play like that so just keep your mind open about him..

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 02:33 GMT

#1367

But slOosh, he switched to Snarfs before you and your vote looked to be in a response to that.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 02:42 GMT

#1369

Im interpreting it as scummy.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 02:45 GMT

#1370

Other opinions on slOosh's vote switch and leadup to it?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 03:14 GMT

#1377

HEY DEBEARs.

Dont be retarded now please. Dont play like your day 1 in LIX.
Or just claim scum. That works

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 10:34 GMT

#1383

Good job at looking like scum phagga

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 11:31 GMT

#1385

Of course, cause there is no way scum would switch their vote when he feels that it is suspicious if he keeps going for it, and since there is no traction for the other lynch.

So Phagga, who is scum?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 12:58 GMT

#1387

Ok Phagga, in your own words, why arnt you telling us scum reads now?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 13:10 GMT

#1390

How does telling your reads give mafia hints? I am utterly confused.

Do you not have 1 read on who is scum?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 13:31 GMT

#1392

And you think that all of town has the same reads? And that scum dont know them? Cause that is the only way town benefits from playing like this.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 13:51 GMT

#1394

Meh, if I cant change your mind, there is no point in continuing this conversation. Just be aware that withholding reads looks scummy in my eyes.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 14:12 GMT

#1396

Im here, I am not willing to call slOosh town yet, still null for me

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 14:22 GMT

#1398

I dont know :/
VE wasnt really gaining much traction, it was about equal at the moment and you were pushing Snarfs lynch so hard.

What really bugs me is the total amount of self-deprecation and buddying that happens after the lynch.

+ Show Spoiler +

On February 13 2013 09:17 slOosh wrote:
Ok, just finished a full reread.

VE, I apologize to you first. I was so immersed in my phagga case and was so disturbed that you totally dismissed it. You are correct in that you have been on Snarfs & prplhz from the beginning. I admit it - I can't read, which led to my misinterpretation of you and then vice versa the cycle. (similar thing happened in ... that WBG game where we nailed scum 3 days in a row ... not that it's relevant but whatever).

Mr. Cheesecake, you are a boss. I am wrong and you are right and I'm sheeping you all game because I am not as good as I thought I was. I rescind my town read on jay and my scum read on Oats. Too good. MVP right here.

Show nested quote +

On February 13 2013 09:27 slOosh wrote:
Eh ... I guess I still have a lot of confirmation bias to deal with.

Phagga smelt like scum and I didn't like that you waived it, but that's probably because I didn't address your Snarfs case first (I guess I missed it or thought Snarfs was right at the time or something).

Also apologies to Oats. You are not daft, I just can't see scum that well.

Ahh ... what a game to go down into the annals of TL Mafia~

Yea ... and not to bias you or anything but I really dig Mr. Cheesecakes' scum team. You can see how they interact with each other. Not that it's valid until you get some flips going, but at this point I've invested enough time into the game for it to click in my head. Oh, and I also could be wrong, so ... yea. Rereading is great!

On February 13 2013 09:38 slOosh wrote:
Oh, yea I suppose. It would be very foolish and humiliating to start celebrations and then end up losing because of arrogance. Excited to do this with you guys. I guess I'll do some homework now and come back at the deadline.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 14:34 GMT

#1400

Hiding scumreads normally is scummy, and I dont see why its different in this case.

At least we can use the 24 hours productively.
I dont think we should discuss who scum is gonna put up though.

Also DEBEARS, you havent posted anything since your opening post.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 13 2013 14:39 GMT

#1402

If tomorrow means the lynch cycle after this, I AM ALL FOR IT.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 14 2013 02:29 GMT

#1450

Mocsta extremely stupid play makes me want to kill him.

Mocsta as you said earlier,

Talk to CC
Make a case
Or
Fuck off.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 14 2013 02:35 GMT

#1454

Ok Mocsta, 2 possibilities.

1. The scum team decided to bus Snarfs cause he was useless, they choose CC to push the lynch who wasnt all that townie.
Then they picked him for nominations cause they know that no one would lynch him.
OR
2. Mr. CC is almost 100% townie in everyones eyes, so they put him up to wifom us.