Normal Mini Mafia IV - Page 113

On February 05 2013 00:26 Promethelax wrote:
scum forgetting night kills is almost unprecedented. Only exceptions I can think of are LC (never forget) and MTG I.

On February 05 2013 00:35 JieXian wrote:
(1) Never once did I say anything close to "Sharrant is scum"

(2) Why counter claim? 2 cops are perfectly possible.

On February 05 2013 00:39 JieXian wrote:


You posted a whole lot of stuff splashing doubt on him. I wanted to lynch you after yamato but I changed my mind.

On February 04 2013 09:09 Mocsta wrote:
Now I haven't filter dived JX yet (at work, so will have to do it tonight); but, I had some problems with what he wrote.

Specifically if he was 1-shot cop that already used power, he is now a VT (a la Vivax); there is nothing to hide from claiming (esp. when requested by EZ) and later again by Djo.

Also

The phrasing of this is completely off. Town dont want a chance to test luck. They want to prove innocence.(e.g. look at my reaction when Djo trying to confirm me via setup speculation; "Thanks but no thanks"). This to me just stinks of scum.

So im sticking with JX being scum for this lynch.

If SK is present deal with it Day5.

##Vote: JieXian

On February 04 2013 07:58 JieXian wrote:
Secondly, were I mafia, nothing is stopping my from claiming VT right away. Djo and Mochsta look like they
may very well lynch iamp and I'd still have a chance if I were to test my luck with that, especially with
the possibility of there being an SK

I'm down to lynch in the following order : iamp > mochsta (if needed) > prome (if needed)

Now I'm back to sleep, go to work later.

On February 02 2013 19:06 Mocsta wrote:

---

On February 02 2013 17:24 JieXian wrote:
That was the most telling one. I can't find anything nearly as strong to argue for xsk or yamato. I mean they were basically not around at all

---

@JieXian
This is my interpretation of how the Thrawn lynch initiated (if you want to take iamp as the catalyst) - technically EZ voted first.

Do you think otherwise?
You were in the moment, I wasn't; perhaps it felt like he was a genuine catalyst as opposed to being cheeky; perhaps that why you were the first to join the vote.

If it was a light comment that then turned into a lynch:

• can you see reasons for iamp not to try and soak town cred?
  
  
• If Thrawn is useless scum as others have pointed out; can you see reasons for iamp to be "annoyed" at him?
  
  
• Do you think killing annoying townies = scum hunting? If so, why isnt Vivax lynched?

On February 05 2013 00:46 JieXian wrote:


dude I was explaining why I had more to gain as scum if I had claimed VT........

On February 05 2013 00:44 Mocsta wrote:


(1) Therein lies the problem. Who is scum to you JX? Your filter has a marked lack of actual scum hunting; you thrown iamp name in recently, based on what? He was your only confirmed town, and now you are recommending him for lynch? On what grounds?

Your good mate Toad, says, early game, dont discuss town reads. For mafia, they know the town reads and dont have to lie - its easy; its much harder for mafia to build a case against someone they know is town.

So yes, you didn't say Sharrant is scum; but you stood up for him, and then suggested you would be comfortable with his lynch due to his low page filter count. Thats not normal for a cop check.

(2) Counter claim has already been discussed in subequent posts (i.e. You are a VT, and can confirm a townie to prevent their mislynch, or mis-vig.... if you actually checked Sharrant and cleared him.. Prome coulda used the bullet on Yamato. Why did this situation NOT occur?

On February 02 2013 00:24 iamperfection wrote:

yeah

i don't trust your so called "plans"

On February 02 2013 01:35 iamperfection wrote:


green check probably less

out for a bit

On February 05 2013 01:05 JieXian wrote:


1 In your quote I asked them to lynch themselves, it's akin to asking them to fuck off >_>

2 No idea there were more VGs

=======

I want to lynch iamp because the only thing stopping me earlier was that 1 post I quoted. When I gave him my town read xskc was looking like shit before you came, yamato well we all know about him.

On to iamp: His latest posts are involving him posturing to lynch anyone he wants but Prom.





you go look at the way he claimed an tell me if it looks like a calculated scum claim.

he slipped that he was dt for god sakes.

On February 02 2013 01:35 iamperfection wrote:


green check probably less

out for a bit

On February 04 2013 07:58 JieXian wrote:
Secondly, were I mafia, nothing is stopping my from claiming VT right away. Djo and Mochsta look like they
may very well lynch iamp and I'd still have a chance if I were to test my luck with that, especially with
the possibility of there being an SK

I'm down to lynch in the following order : iamp > mochsta (if needed) > prome (if needed)

Now I'm back to sleep, go to work later.

On February 03 2013 14:47 Mocsta wrote:
hmm its very disconcerting JX has been as present as Yamato's defense.

Just when I was starting to feel better about him too.

On February 02 2013 19:31 Djodref wrote:
so yeah

GG y u no concede ?
The scum team is iamp and yamato, game over guys

On February 05 2013 01:14 JieXian wrote:
To elaborate:

On February 04 2013 07:58 JieXian wrote:
Secondly, were I mafia, nothing is stopping my from claiming VT right away. Djo and Mochsta look like they
may very well lynch iamp and I'd still have a chance if I were to test my luck with that, especially with
the possibility of there being an SK

I'm down to lynch in the following order : iamp > mochsta (if needed) > prome (if needed)

Now I'm back to sleep, go to work later.

On February 03 2013 14:47 Mocsta wrote:
hmm its very disconcerting JX has been as present as Yamato's defense.

Just when I was starting to feel better about him too.

On February 02 2013 19:31 Djodref wrote:
so yeah

GG y u no concede ?
The scum team is iamp and yamato, game over guys

On February 05 2013 01:26 JieXian wrote:
Let me bold the correct part: