EPTTL Mafia LIX - Page 78
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
I had a pretty major day at work, so don't have formalized reads to push right now. But to promote some discussion, what do you make of the (lack of) activity from Chezinu? I know that is has been discussed as *very* unreadable, but we are now ~8hrs into Day2, and he is on a 2page filter. Is that normal for him? Especially considering he campaigned for mayor? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 23 2013 17:39 Toadesstern wrote: I think he's mafia but the nighthits are retarded as it can get if he's mafia. that was directed at the annul question... | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
I dunno I just didnt like the way Annul got pissed at Bugs. I know Bugs was antagonising, but I seen only one other town ragequit before, and he still tried to be helpful before quitting. When i get home tonight will have a read of Brood and Annul and Gonzaw since those 3 seem to be the higher profile targets for Day2. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 23 2013 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote: I think the problem with Broodking is that he is obviously somewhat active, but no posting other than a few things. I think he may be trying to lurk under the radar. Clarity is different cause he hasnt posted past the first 24 hours IIRC and I think he should get replaced/modkilled. which is exactly the reason BKE is more of a target than clarity is and which is exactly the reason I totally disagree with bugs PoV on clarity. Clarity doesn't even care which makes it highly likely that he just has no time. BKE on the other hand cares enough to not get modkilled and do nothing but that. Unlike Annul he however isn't exactly scummy besides that and I can't really say trying to not get modkilled is a mafiatrait at all... I would be pissed at someone getting modkilled as a townie if he had the possibility to toss in a vote, even if it's a rnd- or selfvote because getting yourself modkilled isn't helpful either... What I'm trying to say is, it really does look like a mafia (BKE) but I could see him do that as a townie as well I guess which means I'm back at Annul / gonzaw.... Palmar where are you, we need you  | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On January 23 2013 14:50 AxleGreaser wrote: Absolutely, we should NOT discuss who we are protecting tonight Last night that didn't work out at all well. However Bugs DID Then Toad Conveniently did what was maximally bad and most likely to result in Sherrif and a Doc if there is one protecting the same person. Toad Claims with logs that cant be verified. That he and Sandroba decided that together. I find that in itself implausible. I believe Sandroba is better than that. I believe Toad is better than that. That Scum then happened to luck out and guess who to attack when their other targets were so Low key.. is to me mind boggling lucky.... or it is a plan. If Toad is scum and takes the sheriff protection off Sandroba, scum kills Sandroba then Toad can claim the logs made him do it. Exactly how tricky does scum toad make his plans? I'm suspicious of Toad as well. I just don't see mafia being so precise or lucky with their kills without full knowledge of what he's going to do. I am against putting a taboo over the NK talk. For the fans of Ockham's : Mafia knew who was going to get jailed and that Bugs was going to be roleblocked, so they shot players like Djo and JX. Highly unlikely that they thought about 3² variations of WIFOM to determine their targets in such a way. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:35 annul wrote: because there is only one mafia jack? On January 23 2013 11:36 annul wrote: or, i should say, there is either 0 or 1 mafia jacks. there is not 2. On January 23 2013 11:37 annul wrote: "These [potentially] four Mafia power roles must be separately distributed, meaning one Mafia member can only possess one of these powers." from the first page Scumslip. ? of ? Jacks remaining ##Vote annul | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
I see the way he corrected himself as scummy. If he really thought what he said there he wouldn't have felt the need to immediately justify it afterwards, he justified it cause he knew he slipped. Mafia suffer from spotlight effect. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
this = OMG SCUMSLIP OMFGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG like are you serious | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
If there are multiple jacks possible is secondary. If you were so sure of it then you wouldn't have felt the need to correct yourself like that. Since you didn't mention that you considered the possibility that the third kill was from a town vigi, don't even think about pulling that card now. @ Toad Give me an estimation of scumminess among these, put them in preferencial order please: annul, yamato, gonzaw, mkfuba | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:45 Vivax wrote: If there are multiple jacks possible is secondary. If you were so sure of only one jack then you wouldn't have felt the need to correct yourself like that. Since you didn't mention the possibility that the third kill was from a town vigi, don't even think about pulling that card now. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On January 23 2013 19:45 Vivax wrote: Since you didn't mention that you considered the possibility that the third kill was from a town vigi, don't even think about pulling that card now. o rly On January 23 2013 10:58 annul wrote: btw mafia has 2 KP, so the third death is either town vig/jack or mafia jack using their shoot power. said like 45 minutes before the post you are attacking me over: On January 23 2013 11:36 annul wrote: or, i should say, there is either 0 or 1 mafia jacks. there is not 2. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
because there is only one mafia jack? Thanks for pointing out that it even made less sense for you to say that after your former expressed considerations. | ||
| ||
