EPT##Vote (GreY): slOosh
Parallel World Mafia: Chaos of GreY - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
##Vote (GreY): slOosh | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
His talk about swapping second-scummiest seems near unworkable, and while there's a little bit of logic there something like that would confuse the game like crazy. He seemed to want one side emptied out of scum, having "confirmed townies," but I'm worried about any scenario where we try to get scum out of one side and all together in another. He hasn't really said anything about reads though. His vote on palmar seems partially joke-y. He's made a town read on me after I swap, and the timing DOES make it seem like he read through my filter. But...there's nothing else. I have no idea what he thinks about anyone, and I can't tell if I like that the only read he seems to have, me being town, is based on me being calm and rational, and on the fact that I agreed with randombum on swap strategy. | ||
|
Dienosore
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
clarity's swap, my objection, after those points almost all the players that I'm concerned with - randombum, marv, kenpachi, haven't been around or haven't said anything. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 14 2012 06:31 Dienosore wrote: I've already explained my reasons, austin. If it feels like there isn't much substance there, it's because there isn't. Clarity fucked us over and now we have little time and little evidence to try and piece something together. I'm doing the best I can with what limited resources I have. Stop tunneling me and maybe put forth some of your opinions on who we should lynch. Wha? Look at your post. On December 14 2012 06:11 Dienosore wrote: I agree with Sandroba that we should be focusing on Marv/Kenpachi. Neither have been particularly active, although Marv at least has made a little effort. It also seems Marv has positive support from a few people, while Kenpachi has only that 'joke' scum read from Keirathi. Unless you guys convince me otherwise, I'll be voting for: ##Vote (Grey): Kenpachi You agree with Sandroba that we should be focusing those two. You don't say why, unless the why is "neither have been particularly active," and I don't think you and randombum have actually been much more active than marv. You appear to be splitting them up on whether or not they have support from anyone. I don't know why Kenpachi WOULD have had support from anyone, since he never came up as a lynch candidate yesterday, there was no reason for anyone to discuss him or vote for him. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
Crossfire99
United States1529 Posts
On December 14 2012 05:12 austinmcc wrote: That leaves me looking at a lynch among: randombum marvellosity kenpachi clarity_nl dienosore At least for D1, I'm happy to throw clarity off the list. Scum starting with 2 in each world means only 3 scum total if he's scum, and if anything I would think he'd be 3P or some kind of half-one alignment, half-the other. We should not absolutely count him town, but for purposes of the D1 lynch I don't think he's a good option. I agree with his assessment of clarity and don't want to lynch him today. I read through dienosore's filter and don't think he's scum atm. I don't have as strong as a read on marv, but I know he plays like this and am fine with not lynching him now. This leaves kenpachi and randombum. Kenpachi is Kenpachi from what I gather. I can't really read him right now, but I don't want to lynch him because he reminds me of chezinu. Chezinu was difficult to read but was a townie. This leaves randombum. Give me some time and I'll see what I can put together. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Also other world, clarity's swap is specifically different from a normal swap. When he swaps people, they maintain their roles. (We can talk more about that later but that means that (1) I want clarity doing any swapping on palmar, slOosh, crossfire. and (2) at some point I'd love to get swapped 2x, so that I can go back to where I was and then come over here through normal swappage) | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
leaning away from marv pending some results. | ||
|
Dienosore
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
We literally have a world full of afkers, with one or two people stirring the same boring pot over and over again. There is no evidence to go on other than Austins objection. That still leaves 5-6 people with nothing super incriminating in their filter. The only logical step I see is to start taking potshots at the scummiest looking lurkers. If I'm wrong, then I've at least goaded people into talking. If I'm right, then hurray scumball down. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 14 2012 06:37 slOosh wrote: austinmcc do you prefer randombum over the other two? He has shown that he is in the least reading the thread. I'm leaning kenpachi at the moment. I'm leaning away from marv for now based on some results. I'm fine leaning away from marv atm. That takes us to randombum dienosore kenpachi Kenpachi feels like the "nobody else looks scummy" option. At the very least, I don't want us voting him now and leaving votes there when we've somewhat wasted today. So I'm most interested in randombum and dienosore. Random HAS been reading thread, or was yesterday, but...in terms of what has happened during half this cycle, he's been MIA. He was commenting yesterday, on the swaps, on marv/foolishness/palmar, but then poof. Way less commentary when things started picking up with clarity's swaps and my objection. The change in reading/activity can be explained by any number of things, but ... I'm no longer sure that I want to stick him way on the side of "reading thread" after participation today. If that makes any sense. His reaction to clarity's swap, that clarity "screwed things up" is WEIRD. randombum was voting, and is voting, PALMAR. clarity didn't mess with randombum's vote, so I don't know what clarity could have screwed up. That phrase is...odd. Real odd. slOosh, thoughts on that post in particular? dienosore I'm waiting on, but he seems to be sheeping a thought process from some guy he's never explained his read on, and in doing so is voting a guy he says he is voting now as a way of "taking potshots at the scummiest looking lurkers." He's not explained yet WHY kenpachi is "the scummiest looking," unless less people talking about someone = scumminess in dienosore's mind. That troubles me. I would prefer lynching into one of these two today over kenpachi I think? Right now the more I look at them, the more I keep disliking little things. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
That post from randombum: On December 13 2012 15:56 randombum wrote: So.... who do we lynch now? On December 13 2012 16:03 Clarity_nl wrote: Dunno, who do you wanna lynch? On December 13 2012 16:05 randombum wrote: Honestly, at the moment you for screwing things up. randombum was voting for palmar. He (I think jokingly) said palmar and marvellosity scum, gg. But when clarity swaps, he seems concerned. He asks who we're going to lynch now, and wants to lynch clarity for "screwing things up." Again, he was voting palmar. He had said NOTHING about foolishness/marv at that point. What was being screwed up? clarity really threw a wrench into the game state as a whole, and into this side's D1 lynch as it stood, but randombum didn't seem to have a dog in that fight. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
Crossfire99
United States1529 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 14 2012 06:50 Crossfire99 wrote: I joined like a cycle or two before he died. So I can't make much out of him from that game, as I don't know what he did for most of it (iirc claim D1? do some stuff). Austin, didn't you play with Dieno in Chrono? I think this is the way he plays town from my cursory following of Chrono. I'm also less willing to be down with basing reads so heavily on meta. If someone's "meta" involves never substantiating reads, I'm going to find them scummy ALWAYS, because that's just a scummy thing to do. Even if someone does that as town, there's no reason why they can't easily do that as scum, and it's beneficial to do so as scum to boot. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On December 14 2012 06:44 austinmcc wrote: I'm fine leaning away from marv atm. That takes us to randombum dienosore kenpachi Kenpachi feels like the "nobody else looks scummy" option. At the very least, I don't want us voting him now and leaving votes there when we've somewhat wasted today. So I'm most interested in randombum and dienosore. Random HAS been reading thread, or was yesterday, but...in terms of what has happened during half this cycle, he's been MIA. He was commenting yesterday, on the swaps, on marv/foolishness/palmar, but then poof. Way less commentary when things started picking up with clarity's swaps and my objection. The change in reading/activity can be explained by any number of things, but ... I'm no longer sure that I want to stick him way on the side of "reading thread" after participation today. If that makes any sense. His reaction to clarity's swap, that clarity "screwed things up" is WEIRD. randombum was voting, and is voting, PALMAR. clarity didn't mess with randombum's vote, so I don't know what clarity could have screwed up. That phrase is...odd. Real odd. slOosh, thoughts on that post in particular? dienosore I'm waiting on, but he seems to be sheeping a thought process from some guy he's never explained his read on, and in doing so is voting a guy he says he is voting now as a way of "taking potshots at the scummiest looking lurkers." He's not explained yet WHY kenpachi is "the scummiest looking," unless less people talking about someone = scumminess in dienosore's mind. That troubles me. I would prefer lynching into one of these two today over kenpachi I think? Right now the more I look at them, the more I keep disliking little things. personally, i was waiting for him to come up with a bs case on me but it never came lol | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 14 2012 06:56 Kenpachi wrote: on another note, im a pretty popular topic Yar. Care to comment on any other topics? Could we get another votecount? | ||
| ||
