EPTBut, since you are getting all defensive. This line of arguing is not excludig you from being scum, just him and you. So you might stay defensive.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXIII - Page 44
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
shz
Germany2687 Posts
But, since you are getting all defensive. This line of arguing is not excludig you from being scum, just him and you. So you might stay defensive. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 23 2012 14:18 shz wrote: You, sir did not understand my post at all. Maybe it was strangely worded so Ill try again: If Omni were scum, he could have just voted for you instead of going for Spaghetti, because at that time you were bout to get lynched. Except if you were scum too, than he had to rescue you from your demise. But if you were scum, and he were scum, we would not made his case againt you in the first place. This is why I don't think there is a reasom to believe Omni is scum. You should have put this in the original post -__- ##unvote ##Vote:Orangeremi | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 23 2012 14:20 shz wrote: *he would not made his his case against you. But, since you are getting all defensive. This line of arguing is not excludig you from being scum, just him and you. So you might stay defensive. Well I'm not going to keel over if you are trying to link me with someone who was suspicious and accuse me of being scum. I had a misunderstanding of what you had said because you said "if Omni is scum Corazon is scum" without giving your opinion on whether you think Omni is scum or not. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 23 2012 14:25 cDgCorazon wrote: who was suspicious. EBWOP: who was under suspicion | ||
|
shz
Germany2687 Posts
What is your current thought of chroma? | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 23 2012 14:34 shz wrote: I hope the confusion is cleared out then. What is your current thought of chroma? My current thoughts on Chroma is that he is un-scummy. He has been very good in making cases against others, and his reasoning and logic has been extremely solid so far. He completely picked apart Mocsta's accusations, and that leads me to believe that he is town, and not just disassociating himself from Omni. He's answered any questions asked to him fully, and without hesitation. His upfrontness indicates that he has nothing sinister to hide. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
He's given us absolutely nothing to base his alignment on (aside from supporting lurking, which is WIFOM at best). He's not even putting in a desultory effort to find scum. I didn't push for a lynch on him day 1 because he at least was posting then and I hoped his activity would increase, but this is completely ridiculous. I know scum has a motive to lurk whereas town doesn't (but often does anyway), but at this rate I'll never have a better read on him than coinflip. And there is no way in hell I want Threesr in the game when and if we hit LYLO, he'll be unreadable as scum and a liability as town. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
I call it a "policy lynch" because he hasn't done anything in particular to make me think he's scum except for doing nothing at all. Which, given there was no attention on him day 2, is in retrospect a pretty strong tell. | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
In regards to a lynch on threesr since that seems to be the topic atm. I said earlier that I didn't think his remarks on lurking were scummy, but then he proceeds to lurk all game and has really provided nothing (I know coming from me it is a bit ironic, but I have at least given out some reads and feel that I have given original thoughts and justification behind my votes thus far, but threesr has done literally nothing). The fact that he is lurking isn't necessarily scummy, but I think the fact that he feels justified in doing it and that he has basically told us "well this is what I am going to do all game" is scummy. All that said I still have a scum read on SHZ and at this point would vote for him over threesr, but like I said above, I am waiting to see more and my mind could change. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
So a short answer to your question, I don't like his posting today because he lists scum reads but votes someone else and doesn't go after the people he listed and he spends the entirety of the day talking about role-blocks and defending himself. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
As for changing his read on you, your post history is small enough that he could convincingly just go back on that whenever it's convenient for him. | ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
----- On December 23 2012 06:15 FatChunk wrote: I'm just curious, why would you assume it's scum RB? This was in error if you refer to my other post shortly after that: + Show Spoiler + On December 22 2012 13:18 cakepie wrote: Please confirm my understanding: because jailkeeper has priority over night KP, the jailkeep action will go through first, and will continue to apply despite death of the jailkeeper by KP (resolved later) In which case, what I said here: may not be correct, as now that I have gone over mocsta's post it seems he certainly could have reasons to want to jail me for the night. My first reaction was to associate the roleblock notification with the presence of a roleblocker, and it did not initially occur to me that the same could arise from the jailkeeper. Furthermore, at that point, having not gone over mocsta's pre-dawn post yet I had no reason to believe that mocsta would want to spend his action on me -- last I left off in early-mid N1 I thought he would be far more concerned about Omni/Aquanim/Chromatically and would have read me at null at worst. ----- I'll be around for a few hours from now (with a brief interruption for dinner). Currently drafting cases, but since some people are here, please leave any questions you might want to direct at me and I will get to them later this evening. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
| ||
