EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXIII - Page 21
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
threesr
73 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:18 threesr wrote: Oh look hes going to vote me, what a surprise. Why shouldn't I vote for you if all I get is sarcastic replies? | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:21 threesr wrote: So you make your voting decisions based on who you like or dislike? Now you are just trying to play the victim card. I have made one voting decision in my time as mafia, and it was a vote to defend myself, not on who I liked or not. Make a useful post, not all of this silly questioning and stuff. | ||
|
Orangeremi
United States94 Posts
I've been thinking about lurking and I find that there is very little reason for it. For townies, it is in no way beneficial. You are not helping the rest of the town when you lurk. This I believe is the primary reason for the lynching lurkers policy. Now, none of this is new discussion so I'd like to throw something else out there: It is not beneficial for mafia to lurk either. Although it helps them more than the town. They are not forwarding their agenda in doing so. That, along with the ongoing consensus to lynch a less active player D1 would drive scum to play more actively, else they draw more attention to them (although they should be doing this anyway). This leads me to believe it isn't a player who is trying to hide in the shadows, but one who is just as active as any other townie. Instead of looking for scum players, they would be making unjustified claims hoping others hop wagon in an attempt to get an innocent player lynched. This is scummy behavior and is what we should be on the look out for. I would like to note I'm not excluding lurkers/less active players from scrutiny. It just should not be a deciding factor. - Corazon, I disagree with your reasoning to vote Aqua. His behavior is hardly scummy. I don't agree with everything he has posted, but his vote for you was justified, even though I don't believe you're scum. He voted to stimulate discussion. It worked. - On December 19 2012 23:21 cakepie wrote: Q: Pick and make a case against someone. I don't feel obligated to respond to this question. I've found very little evidence to incriminate any player and deem it foolish to attempt a case towards anyone I'm entirely unsure of. Maybe I'll come across something before Day's end, but until then I'm inclined not to answer. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:26 Orangeremi wrote: Corazon, I disagree with your reasoning to vote Aqua. His behavior is hardly scummy. I don't agree with everything he has posted, but his vote for you was justified, even though I don't believe you're scum. He voted to stimulate discussion. It worked. I'm voting for him in self defense. I've offered to take my vote off of the table if he does this same. I just believe that head-hunting on Day 1 isn't the most innocent thing to. I must admit, it did work to create discussion, but there are other ways to do it besides putting someone on the chopping block. Edit to this post below, look for the bolded words that aren't votes. | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:25 cDgCorazon wrote: Now you are just trying to play the victim card. I have made one voting decision in my time as mafia, and it was a vote to defend myself, not on who I liked or not. Make a useful post, not all of this silly questioning and stuff. So you are claiming mafia? | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
##vote cDgCorazon | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Why would I want to do that? It is the town's job to look for discrepancies in posts, and I feel like you are making baseless accusations and sarcastic answers. It's like trying to break a brick wall down with a pencil. It's useless. You could have come out and said that you were not going to make any assumptions or accusations without reasonable cause. But you haven't, and it is too late to do that now because you are under fire. You need to rise up to the occasion and defend yourself with logic and reason, not sarcastic answers and baseless accusations. As I've said, the true side of people come out when they are under pressure. It just shows threesr can't handle being accused and cannot find a suitable defense. Even if he is not mafia, he seems to be useless to the town, as of now. If he proves the opposite, I will retract these statements. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
##vote threes | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
##vote threesr Sorry, the auto-correct messed up my typing. Please provide a basis for accusing me, the other two votes were for my lack of answers and non-participation, which I believe I have dispelled in my opinion. | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:25 cDgCorazon wrote: I have made one voting decision in my time as mafia, and it was a vote to defend myself, not on who I liked or not. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Sorry for the typo. But did you really think you were gonna get off on a technicality like that? More evidence please. | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:41 threesr wrote: I say it was your subconscious that made you scum slip, not a technicality. Are you really going to try to use that as a basis of lynching me? It's a weak argument, you're just hoping to get a lucky lynch so the scum have one less person to worry about. Even if you aren't scum, you are toxic to this town and should be lynched. | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 20 2012 06:10 threesr wrote: inb4 this guy hops on the threesr bandwagon So it's ok to bandwagon? Why did you use that sarcastic remark to defend yourself, and now to attack me? | ||
|
threesr
73 Posts
##vote FatChunk | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Are you going to be a head-hunter who does not use reason in his accusations? | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
| ||
