Newbie Mini Mafia XXXII

On December 04 2012 12:20 Rad wrote:


Axle, I think what I said to you in last NMM QT is starting to make sense now. Shit's a lot more real in game. However, you DID make good reads last game (without even reading the QT until later, right?) so keep that in mind and just focus on that. This will help town because: 1. If you're town, your reads are good or 2. If you're scum, town gets to read your original thoughts rather than you just playing the newbie card and sheeping. Don't hold back thinking others are just straight up better than you, waiting for them to make a move.

YO

On December 04 2012 10:05 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:

1.) How many games of Mafia have you played / obs'd? Include roles if you wish.

2.) Would you lynch a lurker (I.E, few posts, little content) over a minor-moderate scumread? Explain.

3.) What is your favorite color?

On December 04 2012 10:04 yamato77 wrote:
Greetings gentlemen!

A few questions to spark ye olde town discussion:

1) How many games have you played on TL?
2) Where do you stand on lurker lynching D1?
3) Pie or Cheesecake?

On December 04 2012 19:26 Kickstart wrote:
I agree that if you don't have much to go on then waiting a bit and formulating your opinions more is ok, but remember that you should post when you have something because waiting until you have an iron clad case will take too long and you need to post reads sooner to establish your "townyness" and spur discussion.

Guess I will have to wait until more people are up to get more feedback on my humongous post, seems that most people called it a night a while ago.

On December 04 2012 19:50 AxleGreaser wrote:

Now doing just that.

OatsMaster A question for you?

Is it a scum tell when one player tries to tell another player how to play?
When do scum do that and why?
When do town do that and why?

Remembering that Lynch all Liars is a thing that some people believe in.
What is your truthful answer to those two?

On December 04 2012 19:45 Sylencia wrote:
<snip>
I feel that lynching lurkers has a negative impact for us, as it really gives up a day where we could be cleaning up the town, and also reduces the number of days we have to live.
<snip>

On December 04 2012 23:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
LOL I am town, what do you mean pretend?

I am getting peoples opinions of issues like policy lynch, changing of meta and that helps me to define reads on players,
If people dont talk, then I cant read them .

On December 04 2012 11:04 Kickstart wrote:
Rephrase your question, it makes no sense to me. I am saying that if I have a strong scum read on someone I am pushing that read over a lurker lynch, but if I have no strong read I would be fine with a lurker lynch. I have no idea if I will get a scum read or if I get one how strong it will be, there isn't enough to go on yet.

On December 04 2012 12:45 Kickstart wrote:
##FoS yamato

Badgering people then voting them when they ignore his badgering

On December 04 2012 14:24 Kickstart wrote:
For example I FoSd Yamato because I don't like much his actions up to this point. It was mostly that what he was doing didn't sit well with me therefor I pointed out what I didn't like and asked others about it. Just the fact that to me he seemed really incessant with his policy talks and then just immediately threw a vote on someone when they didn't answer him. My reaction was just a gut reaction but to figure out if I think it is scummy or not I need to look through his dialogue and try and figure out his intentions, but I wanted to see what others thought about it if anything.

On December 05 2012 11:57 Kickstart wrote:
Since you asked kindly I will entertain you.

a) no one was really suspicious of before (or at least no one had posted about)
and
b) are not one of the "easy targets" (there are several first timers here, some of whom are lurking, and I did not go after any of them)
So how you can say I am stalling when I am bringing up new points against players who had no pressure at all on them is strange to me.


You then call me wishy washy about my suspicion of Yamato. Maybe you should look up what wishy washy, because I have been nothing but firm with my stance that I found his interactions with Axl and his general posting up until that point to be suspicious. You then accuse me of trying to start a case on someone without providing anything to back it up (which is strange since right after you post my large post). I have given a more comprehensive post on why I have my suspicions than anyone thus far - so your accusation is just false.

On December 06 2012 05:07 Kickstart wrote:
Because cheese is able to read my cases and see that I am being honest and thoughtful and then he can read your and Oats "cases" and see they are just lies. That would be why the only votes on me are yours and Oats, because they are shit.

On December 06 2012 09:51 jidolboy wrote:
Hi