EPTIt's basically a cop out for not doing anything for at least the first half of day 1. We know he's here. There isn't anything to read. So why the hell should he get a free 24 hours off?
Hero Mini Mafia - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
It's basically a cop out for not doing anything for at least the first half of day 1. We know he's here. There isn't anything to read. So why the hell should he get a free 24 hours off? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 10 2012 23:10 wherebugsgo wrote: Lol @ Palmar's post. It's basically a cop out for not doing anything for at least the first half of day 1. We know he's here. There isn't anything to read. So why the hell should he get a free 24 hours off? he *shouldn't*, but what you wanna do about it? do you want me to vote him for it like town killed him in Death Note? i don't see a satisfactory solution | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On December 10 2012 23:14 marvellosity wrote: he *shouldn't*, but what you wanna do about it? do you want me to vote him for it like town killed him in Death Note? i don't see a satisfactory solution I haven't read that game, but certainly this type of play isn't what I expect from Palmar as town. In general I would use "laziness" as a one-word description of his scum play. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 10 2012 23:19 wherebugsgo wrote: I haven't read that game, but certainly this type of play isn't what I expect from Palmar as town. In general I would use "laziness" as a one-word description of his scum play. 100% agree, anyway there's not a lot to read, he got lynched (as town) because he had like one or two troll posts and did nothing else. The point is that doing nothing is not the same as doing things lazily. So basically we have to wait for him to do something and then see how he does it. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
We have now 4 people that have not contributed at all since the beginning of this game (Munk-E, Z-Boson, Vivax and Tunkeg). Palmar has made clear when he would be able to start to participate which is at least better than these 4 others. I don't know all the players in this game, and I don't why/if the host would have chosen Palmar to be in the scumteam for balance reason. So I am now under the impression that you are using Palmar as an excuse to not comment on the other players in this game. What about Bluelightz ? Are you familiar with him ? Any comment you would do on his entrance in the thread ? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
I don't understand this line of questioning. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On December 10 2012 22:04 marvellosity wrote: On jay, I'm ok on how he explained his 'slips'. My only worry with jay is that he comes across as overly... compliant?: "Glad someone is reading my posts. I felt like i wasnt get any feedback from them." "I do appreciate you giving your reasoning behind your claim. It helps me understand you a bit." I don't particularly think much of it atm, was just weird when I was reading them. I would say it was indicative of the fact he didn't want to ruffle feathers, but he's not been afraid to put himself out there, so it isn't that. His response reminds me of my own scum game. I showed no emotion that game, I just tried to remain logical and not to ruffle anyone's feathers, thinking that if I kept that up eventually people would stay away from me because I answered every question and reasoned away any doubt. @ Jay I read some of the stuff in your linked games, and yes you lyched town D1 but I never saw you say anything remotely close to "well I guess I should be more careful of early bandwagons". Not during any of the games and not in the pre-games or post-games either. The thing is, you say you don't want to jump on an "easy bandwagon" this game, but you do. All you don't do is you haven't voted for thrawn, but he's the only person you've put pressure on. So why mention it? It's an easy way out. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I wanna hear more from debears about his pushing of Adam. And VE's vote on me is weird given he usually buddies me for at least the first 24 hours. Those are the 2 main things I picked up so far, mostly waiting for all the inactives to show their faces. | ||
|
Munk-E
United States672 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On December 11 2012 00:41 Munk-E wrote: Good morning and hello, everyone! I will be doing a more in depth reading of the thread, but for now, WBG, how on earth did you figure palmer was more likely to be scum than anyone? You said there were 5 people that hadn't participated yet, yet palmer, being one of them had a 2/3rds chance of being scum. Did you sleep through math class, or do you actually have some explaination to back that up? for a first post I don't like how 'irrelevant' this one is. people questioning each other about arbitrary percentages never results in anything useful. munk-e, please get to other stuff from the thread asap | ||
|
Munk-E
United States672 Posts
On December 11 2012 00:45 thrawn2112 wrote: for a first post I don't like how 'irrelevant' this one is. people questioning each other about arbitrary percentages never results in anything useful. munk-e, please get to other stuff from the thread asap I just find it strange how he went from maybe or maybe not policy voting you,(he didn't make it clear either way, which seems like a way to cover his ass in case he made a mistake) to very heavily and arbitrarily tunneling palmer, with no evidence when he had 5 people with the exact same case against them. It doesn't make any sense to me. I mean, he goes from out of nowhere accusing palmer saying he's 80% sure he's mafia, based on absolutely nothing, to when people ask him about it saying "woah, I didn't say i was certain he was scum" On December 10 2012 16:59 wherebugsgo wrote: How many of them are there? How many scum are probably in this game? What did I say was my certainty on Palmar being scum? Don't force me to treat you like you're dumb. Then he lowers the percentage of palmer being scum, probably so if he flips town, he doesn't seem as guilty. It just seems weird to me. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
Could you confirm me that it's only your second game on these forums ? You get yourself lynched D1 or D2 for being inactive in a newbie lately, am I right ? Weird scum or weird town for WBG ? By the way, the way he phrased it didn't exactly mean he was 80% sure he was mafia. It was a preliminary thing, so I understood it as valuable only for this early game. @ everyone What's WBG reputation as a vet ? Would the scum in the mafiaQT shit their pants if he was town ? Anyone else than marv in this game that would be considered as super strong town ? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Is there a reason you're asking? | ||
|
Vivax
21972 Posts
The last post I liked most was from Bluelightz. I also want to remind you of Clarity_nl trying to discuss policy as a first step after thrawns slip. That caught my eye. Posting more soon. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 11 2012 01:17 debears wrote: Maybe he wants to put a clear target on your guys' backs Marv hi! On December 10 2012 21:59 marvellosity wrote: debears, I don't really get whatever your thing on Adam is. You seem to have a problem with him not immediately denouncing thrawn as scum or declaring him town. What's actually wrong with it?? It seems like you're manufacturing something out of nothing. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Here's the passage by Adam I am talking about with the implication of thrawn being scum On December 10 2012 10:19 Adam4167 wrote: I think you better try to explain what you were hoping to accomplish here. I find this post sits in a stark contrast to your current play, and this is from one of your recent town games (ACME). On December 10 2012 10:28 Adam4167 wrote: Town you from ACME says that you disagree with the idea of millers claiming, and that you don't even know what your thought process would be for deciding if its real or not. Why are you trying to put everyone else in a similar position of confusion? If I wanted to call you scum, I would have. What I want to know is why you are doing what you are doing. Notice 1) Your town play is way different 2) Your town play says you wouldn't claim 3) I don't think your scummy despite the "stark contrast" | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 11 2012 01:22 debears wrote: @Djo/Marv Here's the passage by Adam I am talking about with the implication of thrawn being scum Notice 1) Your town play is way different 2) Your town play says you wouldn't claim 3) I don't think your scummy despite the "stark contrast" He said he wasn't calling him scum right that instant, he was questioning him to try to find out what was going on. That doesn't mean he didn't find the play scummy. Presumably the reason he's questioning him is BECAUSE his play was different from his town play. No? | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On December 11 2012 01:12 marvellosity wrote: bugs & Palmar both very strong town, VE not too shabby either. Is there a reason you're asking? Yeah, I was wondering if the scumteam would let scum Munk-E post what he did post against WBG, assuming he is town, or even if he is scum himself. Newbies don't go generally after the vets like this, especially if they are scum, because they know they should be careful with such guy and such guy from some other experienced player in the scumQT. So, basically, my point is that Munk-E doesn't seem to know about WBG reputation or whatever so I lean town on him because it leads me to think he doesn't have extra-info. I'm for giving him some slack and letting him post his thoughts without pressuring him to much. I don't want him to go into "newbie shell mode", especially if he is town, and I currently think there are greater chances for this than him being scum. | ||
| ||
