EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXI - Page 23
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
##Unvote Might just have to go with Munk. Not a clue right now. People be sheeping onto my Yamato case hardcore. Trying to sniff out what's going on here... it's a smelly smell that smells.... smelly. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
[b]##Unvote ##Vote: Kickstart | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
##Vote:KIckstart | ||
|
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On November 27 2012 07:27 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Still not up to date, interesting shit seems to be going on though. Confirmed disappointment. @Yamato Stick around please. I think there's a decent chance you can avoid getting lynched. I for one feel hesistant switching to you. I agree with a lot of what you've been saying, eg wrt Jacob. @Munk Why did you completely drop your case on Oats and vote for Yamato? @Kick Again, what exactly about Munk sheeping the Yamato case made you think he's a bad lynch? | ||
|
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On November 27 2012 07:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok based on what I have read, Kickstart and Munke are scum, kickstart used a lousy case to justify lynching the most lynchable target. I say we vote kickstart today [b]##Unvote ##Vote: Kickstart What in the world happened to your CC read? | ||
|
Munk-E
United States672 Posts
On November 27 2012 07:54 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Confirmed disappointment. @Yamato Stick around please. I think there's a decent chance you can avoid getting lynched. I for one feel hesistant switching to you. I agree with a lot of what you've been saying, eg wrt Jacob. @Munk Why did you completely drop your case on Oats and vote for Yamato? @Kick Again, what exactly about Munk sheeping the Yamato case made you think he's a bad lynch? Yamato is much more likely to be scum than oats. His incessant defence of himself, while lack of actual cases against who he accuses is very scummy behavior. I didn't drop my case, because I never really had one. That post pointed out how at the time, oats posts were weird for a townie. Although may have been inductive of a potential scum alliance, it is much more likely he was just bad. On average, everyone has a 2/9 chance of being mafia, but by his posts,,i would put him at 1/3 | ||
|
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
| ||
|
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On November 27 2012 08:09 Munk-E wrote: Yamato is much more likely to be scum than oats. His incessant defence of himself, while lack of actual cases against who he accuses is very scummy behavior. I didn't drop my case, because I never really had one. That post pointed out how at the time, oats posts were weird for a townie. Although may have been inductive of a potential scum alliance, it is much more likely he was just bad. On average, everyone has a 2/9 chance of being mafia, but by his posts,,i would put him at 1/3 Why have you been so inactive so far? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
My vote is between munk, yamato, and Oats (because he is so flip floppy and barely/refuses to back up anything he has) | ||
|
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
The only one I feel like is actually trying to solve this, think critically and similarly to me is CC. I hope to God he's town. Good night. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
On November 27 2012 07:19 yamato77 wrote: Jacob, equally, has contributed nothing of real value. If he's off playing a video game like he claims (terrible cop-out), then perhaps you guys need to pressure him into making reads that aren't complete fluff like posting a whole paragraph deciphering if I slept the right amount of time in his opinion. His vote on me seems contrived, as does Munk-E's, because neither one cast serious suspicion on me before placing their vote. Wrong I had you under serious suspicion for years before that vote. Anyway just woke up and am reading the thread. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
On November 27 2012 08:09 Munk-E wrote: I didn't drop my case, because I never really had one. That post pointed out how at the time, oats posts were weird for a townie. Although may have been inductive of a potential scum alliance, it is much more likely he was just bad. On average, everyone has a 2/9 chance of being mafia, but by his posts,,i would put him at 1/3 You seem to be giving yourself plenty outs, if he flips town you can say (Oh he was only 1/3 guys totally not my fault) | ||
|
Munk-E
United States672 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
I'm trying to come up with scenarios that will play well in my head if either guy flips town. I think the lesser of the two evils is Munk at this point, simply due to passiveness and ultra mega sheepy attitude. People rolling their face over Yamato because of my few posts doesn't sit well with me... Crap, I hope this ain't a mistake. ##Vote: Munk-E The Cheese will take his leave. Best of luck guys. | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On November 27 2012 08:27 JacobStrangelove wrote: Wrong I had you under serious suspicion for years before that vote. Anyway just woke up and am reading the thread. If your "serious suspicion" is the post I referenced where the entire content is saying you believe me when I say I was sleeping, then it wasn't serious at all, in my opinion. Give a read on someone that isn't completely terrible. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
 but if I vote munk-e now it will seem like I am sheeping. Also I don't see how not voting for the guy with the most votes was sheeping (unless he was actually mafia) particularly when people were leaving the one I voted for.Also Munkey is very cold along side kick who *Twitch* I will not start an association case on day one *cough* | ||
| ||
