Acme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
On November 06 2012 09:46 Acrofales wrote: Town doesn't have their vote on someone they don't want to kill 4 minutes before the deadline in a very contested race. You cannot tell me that Drazak had his vote there, but was just too careless to take it off in favour of someone he felt WAS scummy. His vote was there because he wanted to make it look like he wanted to kill Hopeless1der. Except when push came to shove he suddenly didn't want to kill Hopeless1der anymore. Scum doesn't act that stupid. Except they do. Risen pulled that crap in some game (look in the award thread). He was called too dumb to be scum and coasted by on that to an easy scum victory. However, town get last-second jitters too. My main problem is that Drazak is not explaining his thought process. A town voteswitch would be able to say what was their reasoning. Drazak has NOT explained how he went from "lynch", "wait whoops no, lets not" back to "yeah, lets lynch" in the space of 2 minutes. what, I explained my thought process, I don't think it's fair to lynch someone on a lurker lynch and then see a post about being in meetings or busy all day, I don't think that's a cool thing to do. | ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
I made it clear when I fucking put the vote on him, it was to pressure him into active because he was lurking like a bitch and gettinga way with it, I was the first one to call him on lurking. | ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
Blue Hunting It all started when he started supporting/explaining kush's blue hunting... On November 02 2012 23:25 risk.nuke wrote: He's saying he wants 1 vt with a character specific name to claim to test the theory that all vt's have non-specific character names. And then some more... On November 08 2012 03:40 risk.nuke wrote: I actually agree, Everyone should claim. Both role and name. and then he doesn't even think any blues need to be protected On November 08 2012 04:32 risk.nuke wrote: Wow, get hostile much? There are no blues to protect. Might aswell hear everyones claims. Obviously there's no blues to protect, rofl, half the people have claimed blue. Please please keep going so you can nk all the blues. I think he's also bussing arco pretty good, probably the remaining scumteam. | ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
| ||