EPTTL Mafia LVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
And how long do these games usually last? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
I wanna play scum for once and this seems like the game to do it in. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
*cougheywa-cough* Don't want to have to go all day 1 with zero posts from some people. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote: I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote: How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already? Because Toad and Palmar want to troll the shit out of Bugs like they always do. It doesn't seem meaningful to me. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:20 Palmar wrote: I'm not trolling. I'm sincerely suggesting we policy lynch Bugs to start the game off. 1) It'd be fucking hilarious 2) He's wrong as town 3) He's good as scum So you're following my suggestion from our last game with our Buggy friend, eh? I almost think it's a good idea. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Marv you know better so you starting this Palmar is scum stuff is fishy. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
I agree that Bugs can get in the way of scumhunt when he is town and when scum is possibly highly difficult to catch. Basically the definition of a policy lynch. Complete coin flip. I'm not saying lynch Bugs but I can see where Palmar is coming from. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 08:42 marvellosity wrote: I just knew you'd come into the thread saying something like this. Palmar is not a "normal" player that you can attribute your stupid heuristics to. So then how does him pushing this lynch make him scum, Marv? Enlighten me, O Mighty One. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 08:48 marvellosity wrote: because he's trolling and his discussions on wbg didn't actually move the thread forward. There was no point to anything he did. You come in telling me outspoken player isn't scum when you know I just finished a game as scum with a 20+ page filter. Cmon man. Is scum Palmar as good as scum Marv? Post count =/= loudness in the thread. Iamp always posts a lot but I don't know if I would consider him outspoken. Palmar is putting his opinion out there in a way that would, and obviously did, bring the discussion to thoughts on his own intentions. The only angle you have is that there is little development in the idea of lynching Bugs. People say yes or no, and that's it. There's nothing to it because Bugs isn't posting and probably won't for a while due to some extenuating circumstances. So you think Palmar made this play with the intention of looking like he's opinionated without being opinionated or is he doing this because of the reasons he actually said he was? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 08:54 Lazermonkey wrote: Leaning town on yamato. No scum in their right minds would defend Palmars troll vote on WBG. It would be standard scum-getting-free-townie-points play by dismissing it. With that said, I think his logic is bad. You didn't play with Bugs last game like me, Toad, and Palmar did. You don't know. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
As for actual scum, I think hopeless looks pretty bad right now. Toad pointed the post out earlier and I think he's been pretty useless despite not wanting us all to waste time. I have to go so that's my thought on the game for now. Be back later with some updated ideas. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 09:12 Tunkeg wrote: You think hopeless looks pretty bad now? For not wanting the thread to waste time on a silly policy lynch? Line up the reasons. Don't just spit this out, without any reasons behind it. What ewxactly is scummy about it. Please explain... It was a pointless post. All he says is "guys stop wasting time." And now he's gone, being useless. He hasn't said anything meaningful himself. Cognitive dissonance, if you will. | ||
| ||
