EPT*dustkick*
TL Mafia LVIII - Page 51
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
*dustkick* | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:05 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Considering my other two games with him, it certainly is concerning. :p Are you going to stop making quips and do something at some stage, dearest? | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
On January 04 2013 03:54 marvellosity wrote: Hi froggy, stop inventing narratives dear. I'm finding it increasingly hard to justify your vote on Tunkeg given how, as you yourself noted, he played very similarly last time you played together with him (and me!). What is distinct between his play this game and that game that makes you sure enough to be voting him? In short: it would be silly for me to be certain about anything, particularly Day 1. You are correct about the narrative thing, I was kinda thinking this also. But I hoped Tunkeg would respond with something similar rather than have others jump in. My first vote on him was bad, purposefully so, it was meant to get a reaction, it didn't really work. What then pissed me off is that he doesn't defend himself at all but waits for interest to dissipate when big names come along and defend him. I guess this makes him maybe bad, but not necessarily scum. Ill unvote him because he's just ignoring me/doesnt want to respond and that what little pressure I can bear is now completely gone. ##Unvote Tunkeg | ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:12 VisceraEyes wrote: I laughed IRL. True story.No, deadline. Put it back in your pants Palmar. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
| ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On January 04 2013 03:48 Toadesstern wrote: Arkham City: Palmars filter And well about the first statement. I obviously can't prove he doesn't do that as town because that's impossible. Thing is I haven't seen him doing anything this extreme as town, and I've seen him a couple of times. Gosh you're wasting my time I'm off to McD for half an hour. I want an actual explanation with some quotes and analysis, not a useless filter link. On January 04 2013 04:00 Lazermonkey wrote: Hiro, are you going to explain anytime soon why you have me as (slight)scumread? You have talked about this two times already although not given a single reason for it. In your second post you say that it ''could just be the way he plays.''.What is this really supposed to mean. Why do you even feel the need to post it then? You are just throwing doubt at me for no apparent reason right now. I even call you out for this earlier but you ignored/missed it. You suggested policy lynches on grush/kush, but made no effort to actually push for their lynch and the way in which you overly elaborate on very simple points. I'll share what I want when I feel like it - got it? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:21 Lazermonkey wrote: Wait, why are you guys going after Cheese cake? If the issue lies in the fact that he isn't contributing then why are you ONLY pushing him? What makes him special when about 30% is at his level of contribution? I can see why iamp is on me. Have no clue about VE though. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:21 Lazermonkey wrote: Wait, why are you guys going after Cheese cake? If the issue lies in the fact that he isn't contributing then why are you ONLY pushing him? What makes him special when about 30% is at his level of contribution? where did anyone say they were voting for cheesecake because he wasn't contributing? | ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:23 HiroPro wrote: This is a nice town mentality. In what way do you think we gain on withholding information?You suggested policy lynches on grush/kush, but made no effort to actually push for their lynch and the way in which you overly elaborate on very simple points. I'll share what I want when I feel like it - got it? My suggestion on killing grush/kush was about as serious as Palmar's WBG push. Read: not serious at all. It was merely a way to try to create discussion. Which turned out somewhat okayish. How do I ''overly elaborate on very simple points. ''? Care to give some examples? | ||
|
Vivax
22376 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
Where is Foolishness? Where is wherebugsgo??? how much time is left? 2 hours...? A Palmarlynch is not going to happen. wtf. Don't listen to paranoiatoad! | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:03 Palmar wrote: Yamato is like the townies towny of the townies in this town game. Toad failing to see that is slightly concerning. I do see that and I've got him down the same way. It would just be a little more confirmed townie if he wouldn't be that conservative this time around :p On January 04 2013 04:23 HiroPro wrote: I want an actual explanation with some quotes and analysis, not a useless filter link. You suggested policy lynches on grush/kush, but made no effort to actually push for their lynch and the way in which you overly elaborate on very simple points. I'll share what I want when I feel like it - got it? not going to happen | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Though I really am not sure what to make of Palmar, which is troublesome. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On January 04 2013 04:29 Lazermonkey wrote: This is a nice town mentality. In what way do you think we gain on withholding information? My suggestion on killing grush/kush was about as serious as Palmar's WBG push. Read: not serious at all. It was merely a way to try to create discussion. Which turned out somewhat okayish. How do I ''overly elaborate on very simple points. ''? Care to give some examples? Don't tell me how to play, thanks. I haven't actually voted for you or tried to get you lynched at any point, so there is simply no need for me to explain. Stuff like this: These are single-sentence points that you just drag out for some reason. They don't actually say anything very meaningful but you spend a lot of time spouting stuff like this. Randomly lynching still sucks tho. Sure, on avarage it gives us 24,6% instead if 21,1% to hit the right person, however, what do we do next? It's cool to lynch scum. but if we don't, we will more or less have wasted D1. There will be no way of analyzing vote patterns or w/e. The extra 3,5% doesn't make up for the fact that a random lynch doesn't give us anything to work with on the comming day. So, to summarize a bit, I don't really see these things as townie points TBH. Why? Because you cannot just look how much sense they make from town PoV but also from scum PoV. Calling out strange votes + attacking Palmar can very well give him credit as scum. Thus it all comes down to WIFOM. And thus its a null tell. | ||
| ||
