|
On January 04 2013 02:47 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
The only thing scummy about froggy was that he called himself bad. why is that a sign of him being mafia? plenty of players consider themselves bad.
Town typically don't try to discredit themselves so quickly. Most people are joking around like "lol I'm so bad". He didn't seem to be doing that.
|
On January 04 2013 02:46 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:26 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:15 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:13 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 04 2013 02:12 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
[quote]
Half-baked because only half of you are on it? ^^ Half-baked because he includes zero reasoning and zero other things besides names of people. Pretty useless IMO. I think you're taking it a little too seriously. And talking about random names will just clutter up this thread even more. If those are his honest scum reads I think the guy is full of shit and totally worthless to town, as he has been basically the whole game so far. That's my point. A trolling chez is typically more useful then 90% of the players in a game. You may not like that answer or agree with it but it is straight up fact. I've never played with him before so I have no idea if this is the case or not. However, this logic is used to defend a lot of veteran players on Day 1, so I don't think it particularly useful to say at the moment. eh? You will find that logic should be shot and burned for all players who are not notoriously trollish regardless of alignment of vet players. IE chez or bill murray. Anyone else trying to pull off the "hes trolling day 1 its fine" argument is retarded. Day 1 people begin the trend of how they will play in a game typically. A day 1 troll is likely going to be a troll all game. The only difference is if they have random insight in their posts. So far only chez's rantings are even remotely interesting / relevant from the trolls. What has he said that has been worthwhile so far? Go read his filter. Im not your translator and hes being insanely direct for his normal insanity. He clearly has posted his reads and even called people out. Find out which ones and *gasp* you might realize his posts do actually contain content. I know who he thinks is suspicious but I have no idea why he thinks that or how he thinks what he's doing is helping town lynch those people. It looks like finger pointing masked by a roleplay facade. But fine, I'll give him time because I have reads that lead me elsewhere. You vouching for him is enough to make me reconsider my position at the moment.
Ive never played a game with you to my knowledge so why is my vouching enough to dissuade you?
|
actually even you called yourself bad lol.
|
On January 04 2013 02:50 HiroPro wrote:
actually even you called yourself bad lol.
I said I reserved the right to be bad. Not that I was.
|
On January 04 2013 02:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:47 HiroPro wrote:On January 04 2013 02:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
The only thing scummy about froggy was that he called himself bad. why is that a sign of him being mafia? plenty of players consider themselves bad. Town typically don't try to discredit themselves so quickly. Most people are joking around like "lol I'm so bad". He didn't seem to be doing that.
you really look to be reaching at straws dude. Someone calling them self bad in what is considered a stacked list of "vet" players is not something indicative of alignment. You trying to claim it is looks really bad on you.
|
On January 04 2013 02:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:47 HiroPro wrote:On January 04 2013 02:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
The only thing scummy about froggy was that he called himself bad. why is that a sign of him being mafia? plenty of players consider themselves bad. Town typically don't try to discredit themselves so quickly. Most people are joking around like "lol I'm so bad". He didn't seem to be doing that.
hm, ok.
|
On January 04 2013 02:51 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 04 2013 02:47 HiroPro wrote:On January 04 2013 02:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
The only thing scummy about froggy was that he called himself bad. why is that a sign of him being mafia? plenty of players consider themselves bad. Town typically don't try to discredit themselves so quickly. Most people are joking around like "lol I'm so bad". He didn't seem to be doing that. you really look to be reaching at straws dude. Someone calling them self bad in what is considered a stacked list of "vet" players is not something indicative of alignment. You trying to claim it is looks really bad on you.
Cool story. I don't even find froggy scummy. I only said it was a little thing.
|
11589 Posts
On January 04 2013 02:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:46 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:26 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:15 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:13 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 04 2013 02:12 yamato77 wrote:
[quote]
Half-baked because he includes zero reasoning and zero other things besides names of people.
Pretty useless IMO. I think you're taking it a little too seriously. And talking about random names will just clutter up this thread even more. If those are his honest scum reads I think the guy is full of shit and totally worthless to town, as he has been basically the whole game so far. That's my point. A trolling chez is typically more useful then 90% of the players in a game. You may not like that answer or agree with it but it is straight up fact. I've never played with him before so I have no idea if this is the case or not. However, this logic is used to defend a lot of veteran players on Day 1, so I don't think it particularly useful to say at the moment. eh? You will find that logic should be shot and burned for all players who are not notoriously trollish regardless of alignment of vet players. IE chez or bill murray. Anyone else trying to pull off the "hes trolling day 1 its fine" argument is retarded. Day 1 people begin the trend of how they will play in a game typically. A day 1 troll is likely going to be a troll all game. The only difference is if they have random insight in their posts. So far only chez's rantings are even remotely interesting / relevant from the trolls. What has he said that has been worthwhile so far? Go read his filter. Im not your translator and hes being insanely direct for his normal insanity. He clearly has posted his reads and even called people out. Find out which ones and *gasp* you might realize his posts do actually contain content. I know who he thinks is suspicious but I have no idea why he thinks that or how he thinks what he's doing is helping town lynch those people. It looks like finger pointing masked by a roleplay facade. But fine, I'll give him time because I have reads that lead me elsewhere. You vouching for him is enough to make me reconsider my position at the moment. Ive never played a game with you to my knowledge so why is my vouching enough to dissuade you?
So far you seem like a player who is playing straight up, unlike most of the veterans in this game. I have no current reason to mistrust your judgment, and you would know Chezinu better than I would. I don't like what he's doing but that doesn't make him mafia necessarily, and I know I could have a biased opinion because I know his biggest scum read in the game at the moment, me, is definitely not scum. I tend to think veterans who are wrong are scum, but I should know better.
|
On January 04 2013 02:54 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:46 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:26 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:15 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:13 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
[quote]
I think you're taking it a little too seriously. And talking about random names will just clutter up this thread even more. If those are his honest scum reads I think the guy is full of shit and totally worthless to town, as he has been basically the whole game so far. That's my point. A trolling chez is typically more useful then 90% of the players in a game. You may not like that answer or agree with it but it is straight up fact. I've never played with him before so I have no idea if this is the case or not. However, this logic is used to defend a lot of veteran players on Day 1, so I don't think it particularly useful to say at the moment. eh? You will find that logic should be shot and burned for all players who are not notoriously trollish regardless of alignment of vet players. IE chez or bill murray. Anyone else trying to pull off the "hes trolling day 1 its fine" argument is retarded. Day 1 people begin the trend of how they will play in a game typically. A day 1 troll is likely going to be a troll all game. The only difference is if they have random insight in their posts. So far only chez's rantings are even remotely interesting / relevant from the trolls. What has he said that has been worthwhile so far? Go read his filter. Im not your translator and hes being insanely direct for his normal insanity. He clearly has posted his reads and even called people out. Find out which ones and *gasp* you might realize his posts do actually contain content. I know who he thinks is suspicious but I have no idea why he thinks that or how he thinks what he's doing is helping town lynch those people. It looks like finger pointing masked by a roleplay facade. But fine, I'll give him time because I have reads that lead me elsewhere. You vouching for him is enough to make me reconsider my position at the moment. Ive never played a game with you to my knowledge so why is my vouching enough to dissuade you? So far you seem like a player who is playing straight up, unlike most of the veterans in this game. I have no current reason to mistrust your judgment, and you would know Chezinu better than I would. I don't like what he's doing but that doesn't make him mafia necessarily, and I know I could have a biased opinion because I know his biggest scum read in the game at the moment, me, is definitely not scum. I tend to think veterans who are wrong are scum, but I should know better.
Id argue his biggest scum read is thrawn but to each their own. I understand fully why he views you as fishy though.
|
On January 04 2013 02:52 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:51 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 04 2013 02:47 HiroPro wrote:On January 04 2013 02:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
The only thing scummy about froggy was that he called himself bad. why is that a sign of him being mafia? plenty of players consider themselves bad. Town typically don't try to discredit themselves so quickly. Most people are joking around like "lol I'm so bad". He didn't seem to be doing that. you really look to be reaching at straws dude. Someone calling them self bad in what is considered a stacked list of "vet" players is not something indicative of alignment. You trying to claim it is looks really bad on you. Cool story. I don't even find froggy scummy. I only said it was a little thing.
Cool story, you just said you did find him scummy.
|
11589 Posts
On January 04 2013 02:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:54 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:46 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:26 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:15 yamato77 wrote:
[quote]
If those are his honest scum reads I think the guy is full of shit and totally worthless to town, as he has been basically the whole game so far.
That's my point. A trolling chez is typically more useful then 90% of the players in a game. You may not like that answer or agree with it but it is straight up fact. I've never played with him before so I have no idea if this is the case or not. However, this logic is used to defend a lot of veteran players on Day 1, so I don't think it particularly useful to say at the moment. eh? You will find that logic should be shot and burned for all players who are not notoriously trollish regardless of alignment of vet players. IE chez or bill murray. Anyone else trying to pull off the "hes trolling day 1 its fine" argument is retarded. Day 1 people begin the trend of how they will play in a game typically. A day 1 troll is likely going to be a troll all game. The only difference is if they have random insight in their posts. So far only chez's rantings are even remotely interesting / relevant from the trolls. What has he said that has been worthwhile so far? Go read his filter. Im not your translator and hes being insanely direct for his normal insanity. He clearly has posted his reads and even called people out. Find out which ones and *gasp* you might realize his posts do actually contain content. I know who he thinks is suspicious but I have no idea why he thinks that or how he thinks what he's doing is helping town lynch those people. It looks like finger pointing masked by a roleplay facade. But fine, I'll give him time because I have reads that lead me elsewhere. You vouching for him is enough to make me reconsider my position at the moment. Ive never played a game with you to my knowledge so why is my vouching enough to dissuade you? So far you seem like a player who is playing straight up, unlike most of the veterans in this game. I have no current reason to mistrust your judgment, and you would know Chezinu better than I would. I don't like what he's doing but that doesn't make him mafia necessarily, and I know I could have a biased opinion because I know his biggest scum read in the game at the moment, me, is definitely not scum. I tend to think veterans who are wrong are scum, but I should know better. Id argue his biggest scum read is thrawn but to each their own. I understand fully why he views you as fishy though.
I'm not sure I understand but perhaps that is one of my shortcomings as a player.
|
On January 04 2013 02:59 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:54 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:46 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:26 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]
A trolling chez is typically more useful then 90% of the players in a game. You may not like that answer or agree with it but it is straight up fact.
I've never played with him before so I have no idea if this is the case or not. However, this logic is used to defend a lot of veteran players on Day 1, so I don't think it particularly useful to say at the moment. eh? You will find that logic should be shot and burned for all players who are not notoriously trollish regardless of alignment of vet players. IE chez or bill murray. Anyone else trying to pull off the "hes trolling day 1 its fine" argument is retarded. Day 1 people begin the trend of how they will play in a game typically. A day 1 troll is likely going to be a troll all game. The only difference is if they have random insight in their posts. So far only chez's rantings are even remotely interesting / relevant from the trolls. What has he said that has been worthwhile so far? Go read his filter. Im not your translator and hes being insanely direct for his normal insanity. He clearly has posted his reads and even called people out. Find out which ones and *gasp* you might realize his posts do actually contain content. I know who he thinks is suspicious but I have no idea why he thinks that or how he thinks what he's doing is helping town lynch those people. It looks like finger pointing masked by a roleplay facade. But fine, I'll give him time because I have reads that lead me elsewhere. You vouching for him is enough to make me reconsider my position at the moment. Ive never played a game with you to my knowledge so why is my vouching enough to dissuade you? So far you seem like a player who is playing straight up, unlike most of the veterans in this game. I have no current reason to mistrust your judgment, and you would know Chezinu better than I would. I don't like what he's doing but that doesn't make him mafia necessarily, and I know I could have a biased opinion because I know his biggest scum read in the game at the moment, me, is definitely not scum. I tend to think veterans who are wrong are scum, but I should know better. Id argue his biggest scum read is thrawn but to each their own. I understand fully why he views you as fishy though. I'm not sure I understand but perhaps that is one of my shortcomings as a player.
possible. I dont have enough to build a case so just keep in mind your being watched. Id say for what, but that would ruin the point of it all.
|
11589 Posts
On January 04 2013 03:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 02:59 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:54 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:46 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:26 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 02:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On January 04 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:
[quote]
I've never played with him before so I have no idea if this is the case or not. However, this logic is used to defend a lot of veteran players on Day 1, so I don't think it particularly useful to say at the moment. eh? You will find that logic should be shot and burned for all players who are not notoriously trollish regardless of alignment of vet players. IE chez or bill murray. Anyone else trying to pull off the "hes trolling day 1 its fine" argument is retarded. Day 1 people begin the trend of how they will play in a game typically. A day 1 troll is likely going to be a troll all game. The only difference is if they have random insight in their posts. So far only chez's rantings are even remotely interesting / relevant from the trolls. What has he said that has been worthwhile so far? Go read his filter. Im not your translator and hes being insanely direct for his normal insanity. He clearly has posted his reads and even called people out. Find out which ones and *gasp* you might realize his posts do actually contain content. I know who he thinks is suspicious but I have no idea why he thinks that or how he thinks what he's doing is helping town lynch those people. It looks like finger pointing masked by a roleplay facade. But fine, I'll give him time because I have reads that lead me elsewhere. You vouching for him is enough to make me reconsider my position at the moment. Ive never played a game with you to my knowledge so why is my vouching enough to dissuade you? So far you seem like a player who is playing straight up, unlike most of the veterans in this game. I have no current reason to mistrust your judgment, and you would know Chezinu better than I would. I don't like what he's doing but that doesn't make him mafia necessarily, and I know I could have a biased opinion because I know his biggest scum read in the game at the moment, me, is definitely not scum. I tend to think veterans who are wrong are scum, but I should know better. Id argue his biggest scum read is thrawn but to each their own. I understand fully why he views you as fishy though. I'm not sure I understand but perhaps that is one of my shortcomings as a player. possible. I dont have enough to build a case so just keep in mind your being watched. Id say for what, but that would ruin the point of it all.
Fair enough.
Who else is on your watch list, BC?
|
On January 04 2013 02:39 Tunkeg wrote:
You guys shouldn't underestimate the butthurt in froggy. He plays with emotions rather then his brain. He want me to be scum so bad that he probably actually believe it.
I wouldn't describe myself with buthurt. I cannot stand people with big egos who think the only way to play Mafia (or interact on the internet generally for that matter) is spraying their man juices (apologies for sexism) on everyone around rather than trying to act sensibly and cooperate. I voted on you to see how you would act knowing full well that you were a huge ego last time I played here regardless of alignment. Your reactions so far however have not impressed me, you don't deal with the why, point your finger at people and you state general shit out, but I doubt you care.
To be fair the above could also be applied to Palmar. I just think that he has still created more material for people to read on d1, this to me is a townie action despite his behaviour. Your actions, regardless of your bad behaviour though seem scummy... but hey I must be listening to my emotions again...
|
Yamato are you actively trying to improve by listening to what I told you in the Obs-QT a couple days ago ?
It was easier to read you yesterday 
Btw I'd really love to know who's got access to that stupid obs-QT because of that one paragraph I directed at you and some other things people said. Mind updating the OP Marv? :p
|
Oh, if you got any thoughts about debears I'd like hearing them Yamato. You just played with him as well. Aynthing that you'd consider worth a thing about him?
|
11589 Posts
On January 04 2013 03:07 Toadesstern wrote:Yamato are you actively trying to improve by listening to what I told you in the Obs-QT a couple days ago ? It was easier to read you yesterday Btw I'd really love to know who's got access to that stupid obs-QT because of that one paragraph I directed at you and some other things people said. Mind updating the OP Marv? :p
What do you mean? Today I'm playing bad again?
I think it's possible.
|
On January 04 2013 03:09 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 03:07 Toadesstern wrote:Yamato are you actively trying to improve by listening to what I told you in the Obs-QT a couple days ago ? It was easier to read you yesterday Btw I'd really love to know who's got access to that stupid obs-QT because of that one paragraph I directed at you and some other things people said. Mind updating the OP Marv? :p What do you mean? Today I'm playing bad again? I think it's possible.
Nah, you're actually way more reseverd in the way you're posting right now. No rambo "let's fuck this shit and lynch this guy because he disagrees with me and therefore has to be a retard".
|
11589 Posts
On January 04 2013 03:09 Toadesstern wrote:
Oh, if you got any thoughts about debears I'd like hearing them Yamato. You just played with him as well. Aynthing that you'd consider worth a thing about him?
Hm.
Debears hasn't posted much, and what he has posted wasn't scum hunting. That's about it.
So much like many players, I'm waiting to see what their plan is for this game.
|
On January 04 2013 03:11 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 03:09 yamato77 wrote:On January 04 2013 03:07 Toadesstern wrote:Yamato are you actively trying to improve by listening to what I told you in the Obs-QT a couple days ago ? It was easier to read you yesterday Btw I'd really love to know who's got access to that stupid obs-QT because of that one paragraph I directed at you and some other things people said. Mind updating the OP Marv? :p What do you mean? Today I'm playing bad again? I think it's possible. Nah, you're actually way more reseverd in the way you're posting right now. No rambo "let's fuck this shit and lynch this guy because he disagrees with me and therefore has to be a retard".
So Yamato is playing bad because he's acting more civil / sensible? O.o
|
|
|
|
|
|
21229
1019
587
313
12
EPT
