|
On January 03 2013 14:13 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 14:10 Adam4167 wrote:On January 03 2013 13:53 debears wrote:On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off On December 25 2012 14:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Merry Christmas TL Mafia!
Over the past 9 months, I've been going back through old games and putting together a mafia database. For each game, I have a record containing game details, the players to have played each game, their roles, and the whether they were lynched, killed, etc. I've put together a TL Mafia Library record for each game (excluding the summary/analysis). I may end up merging this entire post with the library sticky if I'm able to have access to the library account. Additionally, there is a list for each player for all the games they have played, their roles, and links to their filters. Hopefully this will come in handy for people who want an easy way to look for a game where player X was mafia or had a certain role. Finally, I put together a few fun statistics.
Special thanks to Meapak, Dirkzor, VisceraEyes, layabout and Marv for their help!
Mafia players are lynched 21.1% of the time on day one.
Random lynching would result in a mafia lynch 24.6% of the time.
44% of players playing in a newbie game have returned to play in at least 1 other game.
There have been 931 distinct mafia players. Care to elaborate on what you're trying to imply here? Should be pretty clear. Random lynching is more successful than actual trying to lynch a scum by scumreads d1. You can't diss random lynching
So do you find that Hopeless not being interested in a random lynch points to him being scum?
|
On January 03 2013 13:53 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 14:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Merry Christmas TL Mafia!
Over the past 9 months, I've been going back through old games and putting together a mafia database. For each game, I have a record containing game details, the players to have played each game, their roles, and the whether they were lynched, killed, etc. I've put together a TL Mafia Library record for each game (excluding the summary/analysis). I may end up merging this entire post with the library sticky if I'm able to have access to the library account. Additionally, there is a list for each player for all the games they have played, their roles, and links to their filters. Hopefully this will come in handy for people who want an easy way to look for a game where player X was mafia or had a certain role. Finally, I put together a few fun statistics.
Special thanks to Meapak, Dirkzor, VisceraEyes, layabout and Marv for their help!
Mafia players are lynched 21.1% of the time on day one.
Random lynching would result in a mafia lynch 24.6% of the time.
44% of players playing in a newbie game have returned to play in at least 1 other game.
There have been 931 distinct mafia players.
debears of the Brown,
I find it most amusing that you reference numbers in your post in defense of a hopeless individual. Numbers make people believe what you say and adds importance to your character. However, what blows my mind the most is the very fact that your numbers may in fact be relatively accurate. Having a mafia database will forever change the use of statistic in backing one's cause. In the days of the Great Aces, such percentages were mere illusions. Now, I must question not the irrelevance nor accuracy of the statistics but the methods in which one wields it. In this case, I see that you have used it as a shield for your hopeless....brother. You are your brother's keeper... Well done. Continue on in the ways of the Brown.
The leader of the Brown Brotherhood,
Chezinu the Brown
|
11589 Posts
Adam what do you think about the game right now?
Do you have any scum reads?
|
debears of the Brown,
I am sending this letter to inform you of the errors in my previous message. The scribe who wrote the previous note will no longer be working for me... The fool wrote "the days of the Great Aces" instead of "the days of the Great Laces." In addition, there were even other minor mistakes that were present, which I will not spend my time reciting such as "statistic" instead of "statistics." I will see to it that the scribe will no longer find any more work. I know several ninjas of the Brown who can ensure that no employer will hire him.
My apologies,
Chezinu the Brown
|
Marvel is viscous to his own teammates. Just saying.
|
On January 03 2013 14:33 yamato77 wrote:
Adam what do you think about the game right now?
Do you have any scum reads?
What do I think about the game right now? I haven't read it. I opened the thread on page 34, saw a bad post and commented on it. As for my scum reads, Ill let you know after i catch up on the thread.
Right now, i'm waiting for dabears to answer my question.
|
hullo guys
still reading through but first gotta say that i don't understand/am frustrated by the wbg lynch talk. i think that either way palmar is just being dumb cuz he wants to be and i don't like basing my reads on 'discussion points' like that
|
hi yamato
On January 03 2013 08:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 08:41 iamperfection wrote:On January 03 2013 08:40 yamato77 wrote:
Outspoken player =/= scum. Palmar is overly active and has good reasons for the policy lynch.
Marv you know better so you starting this Palmar is scum stuff is fishy. what good reasons I agree that Bugs can get in the way of scumhunt when he is town and when scum is possibly highly difficult to catch. Basically the definition of a policy lynch. Complete coin flip. I'm not saying lynch Bugs but I can see where Palmar is coming from.
I don't see where a town palmar could *seriously* be coming from. I can see where he'd be coming from if the purpose is to start discussion but the idea that he could have a legitimate reason to policy lynch someone like wbg is crazy. yamato you are saying palmar's 'policy vote' makes palmar more likely to be town?
On January 03 2013 09:37 yamato77 wrote:
If your town meta is being a dick to other townies then you should rethink how you play this game.
Hopeless has been a zero presence poster. His only contribution is to tell other people that they are wasting time. He is worthy of my suspicion.
the bolded part reads as "I'm having to fake my scumreads"
|
the only person in the thread i don't have any concerns about is grush, go figure
chezinu a way better policy lynch than grush
|
Does that mean he's always like this?
|
lazermonkey strongest scumread atm.
talks about his vote as if it's meaningless......
On January 03 2013 08:40 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote:On January 03 2013 08:37 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 08:34 kushm4sta wrote:On January 03 2013 08:33 iamperfection wrote:On January 03 2013 08:27 kushm4sta wrote:
@iamp I didn't run away im lurking. do you feel like commenting on anything or do you plan on being useless? no to both ##Vote: kushm4staThis guy... let me give you some insight into kush. he says retarded things all the time regardless of alignment (regardless of being in game or not really). Change your mind at all? The game just started, and I'm perfectly okay with swapping my vote later on.
......and acts similarly with his tunkeg vote.
On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets...
That's absolutely wrong. Lazer go read town grush's filter in hero and let me know if you are willing to stand by that statement.
LM also wants to kill kush because of meta reasons and I disagree with that. scum kush may be a little tricky to pick out but I think town kush is easily identifiable.
Other than pushing policy lynches on players who aren't that hard to read when they're town, Lm hasn't been scumhunting. The closest he's come to scumhunting was his omgus fight with tunkeg and his last stance on that issue was wishy washy (a vote, that, self admittedly will change)
|
On January 03 2013 16:19 thrawn2112 wrote:
the only person in the thread i don't have any concerns about is grush, go figure
chezinu a way better policy lynch than grush
Don't you know the alignment statistics for players who play with Chezinu for the first time and tries to get him lynched? It's like almost 100%. This trend was confirmed by Chezinu himself the after blazinghand flipped mafia. This does not put you into a good position at all. I am a behavior reaction reader. I can't just sit back and figure most people roles. I have to poke them first, get a reaction, then diagnose their role. However, doing this causes me to have to act somewhat scummy...which is not bad at all. For it is not the mafia I fear, but the town. Mafia likes me as a safety net and I like being that safety net. mafia should know that you should keep Chezinu around for a while for the laughs and safety. You just got to kill me before I create my lists. But even then, do you think Chezinu can even convince the town?
Conclusion, mafia should not lynch Chezinu. Town should not either, for Chezinu can make good list. For Everyone, Chezinu should not be lynch because he can provide you with entertainment.
So thraw, pointing at me was a bad mistake. I would however like to give you props for scumhunting Y-man.
Mafia Beware,
The Brown Brotherhood is being founded. Join us or we will have to join you....in death
|
chezinu what are you saying? that you don't think debears is scummy?
that's great but who do you think is scummy?
|
On January 03 2013 16:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
Does that mean he's always like this?
Who do you want to lynch today clarity?
So far, you've told us who you don't want to lynch (palmar and tunkeg), but I want to know who strikes you as interesting.
|
Mafia is in a panic. One of there own is named. They scream frantically trying to find others to accuse. Who is the accuser of the brethren?
|
On January 03 2013 16:33 thrawn2112 wrote:
scum kush may be a little tricky to pick out but I think town kush is easily identifiable.
makes no sense
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 16:40 Adam4167 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 16:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
Does that mean he's always like this? Who do you want to lynch today clarity? So far, you've told us who you don't want to lynch (palmar and tunkeg), but I want to know who strikes you as interesting.
I have no idea. If I had to pick someone right now and he'd instantly get lynched it would be someone who hasn't posted yet and isn't a vet.
|
On January 03 2013 16:43 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 16:40 Adam4167 wrote:On January 03 2013 16:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
Does that mean he's always like this? Who do you want to lynch today clarity? So far, you've told us who you don't want to lynch (palmar and tunkeg), but I want to know who strikes you as interesting. I have no idea. If I had to pick someone right now and he'd instantly get lynched it would be someone who hasn't posted yet and isn't a vet.
I understand. Killing strangers is so much easier because you have no direct connection with them. Hi, I am Chezinu. It's nice to meet. Want to be friends? Friends don't kill friends!
|
On January 03 2013 16:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
uh... how
if I'm easy to identify as town, then it follows that I would be just as easy to identify as scum
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
