|
EBWOP, change in bold,red:+ Show Spoiler +On January 03 2013 12:10 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:02 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On January 03 2013 11:39 Toadesstern wrote:
Seriously, why do people start talking about townreads all the time?
I hate that and nowadays everyone does it. Even you marv... you're better than that.
There's no reason to talk about a townread, no matter how weak or how strong on d1 unless the guy in question is about to be lynched. Don't give people an easy time skating by by dropping some random townreads, talk about things you consider to be weird. I talk about town reads because I am defending my position that people who want to lynch Tunkeg right now are making oh so very stupid decisions. Also I think they are wrong. But I defer to your infinite wisdom Toad. Surely you know better than I. Post some information devoid of townreads and do explain on who is the scum and why you are right. Or at the very least, who you think is wrong. See the thing is, I haven't mentioned a single town read (besides one that only 1 guy in the thread knows about :3) at all and I don't plan on doing it, neither should you. I've mentioned a couple of things I consider weird, mainly some things about Palmar and Marv so far. Not saying I'm the wisdom in person and I never intended it to be that way but it is INCREDIBLY hard to tell a townie who's posting a townread apart from a mafia who's posting a townread while both may look like something useful (it's not). A townread is best kept to yourself, especially early on. - There's no reason to tell people what the key to making you think someone is town is.
- There's no reason to tell mafia (if you're town) who you consider to be a likely townie is.
- There's no reason to tell anybody why you think someone is town at all, unless said person is about to be lynched (I don't see that happening right now.
On top of that, it is incredibly easy for mafia to look like they're doing something by posting townreads. They know they're right on something, they don't have to make up bullshit, which they have to when they're doing scumreads unless they're bussing. They can get in the thread make 4 townreads about someone, mix in 2 mafiabuddies and tell people they're town as well and there's almost no way to distinguish that from a townie. I mean there is, but it's just WAY hader than by looking at peoples mafiareads because again, mafia have to make up some bullshit when doing those, they got confirmation bias and already know they're wrong and all that is making it hard for mafias to talk about mafia-reads. Talking about townreads isn't for them, not at all. That being said, I'd very much like a situation in which we just keep our townreads to ourselves pretty please.
|
On January 03 2013 11:45 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:38 yamato77 wrote:
What does anything these good mafia players say in the early game mean?
They basically just post to post. The only alignment indicative things they do in the game is lynch people. Or rather, try to lynch townies. This post is useless, quite like your suspicions against me. What would you like to hear from me yamato? Do you have any thoughts about the game that don't involve policy lynches?
yeah, palmar looks more like scum to me than town, but again, not willing to lynch into him. Toad also looks scummy because he's spewing nonsense and then telling me I'm dumb for taking him even remotely seriously. In the event that I manage to get lynched, he plays the "guys it was Day 1 I was just joking around" card.
Toad's last post isn't particularly alignment indicative, and while a nice sentiment (no town reads), it ultimately lends more to my confirmation bias that he isn't actually helping town this game, he`s just posting and being active.
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 07:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
This just in, palmar most likely town.
More in a few hours when I get home.
What happened to this?
|
On January 03 2013 12:18 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
This just in, palmar most likely town.
More in a few hours when I get home. What happened to this?
nothing, I'm willing to kill tunkeg, that's more. Palmar still town although supersoft is right that I maybe shouldn't have pointed it out. In my defense, if I was scum I could have just told my teammates and let the thread fight it out.
|
And the "more" = "kill tunkeg"?
|
On January 03 2013 12:16 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 11:45 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:38 yamato77 wrote:
What does anything these good mafia players say in the early game mean?
They basically just post to post. The only alignment indicative things they do in the game is lynch people. Or rather, try to lynch townies. This post is useless, quite like your suspicions against me. What would you like to hear from me yamato? Do you have any thoughts about the game that don't involve policy lynches? yeah, palmar looks more like scum to me than town, but again, not willing to lynch into him. Toad also looks scummy because he's spewing nonsense and then telling me I'm dumb for taking him even remotely seriously. In the event that I manage to get lynched, he plays the "guys it was Day 1 I was just joking around" card. Toad's last post isn't particularly alignment indicative, and while a nice sentiment (no town reads), it ultimately lends more to my confirmation bias that he isn't actually helping town this game, he`s just posting and being active.
why are you already talking about what might happen if you end up being lynched. Seriously that is a weird post you just did.
You're telling me I'm setting up a d2 lynch (which I wasn't lol, not even setting up a d1 lynch yet) and now you get in here telling people that if you get lynched (why?) I'm playing some kind of card?
That's the most backwards posting I've ever seen. I also never said you're dumb, I told you that I got a problem with one line of your posts and that you need to chill out after you got all mad at me for pointing that out. Should I not have mentioned it instead?
What should my approach should have been? Ignore it? And seriously don't make it look like I'm insulting you because I'm not. I haven't insulted anyone in this game besides bugs.
About the nice sentiment. I'm just posting instead of doing something? I posted it because I saw multiple people doing it so far and I don't like it, you say you don't like it either. So something's wrong. I'm trying to change that by posting it.
If I had posted that without a reason like "sup guys, here's what we do" without anyone posting townreads that'd be something but there's a reason for that post and you're ignoring it, making it sound like I did it for fluff when clearly I'm trying to get people to STOP DOING IT, which according to you isn't anything?
|
On January 03 2013 12:23 Hopeless1der wrote:
And the "more" = "kill tunkeg"?
The clearest and most concise thing posted in the thread thus far!
|
On January 03 2013 12:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:The clearest and most concise thing posted in the thread thus far!
but why kill tunkeg?
|
On January 03 2013 12:25 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:16 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:45 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:38 yamato77 wrote:
What does anything these good mafia players say in the early game mean?
They basically just post to post. The only alignment indicative things they do in the game is lynch people. Or rather, try to lynch townies. This post is useless, quite like your suspicions against me. What would you like to hear from me yamato? Do you have any thoughts about the game that don't involve policy lynches? yeah, palmar looks more like scum to me than town, but again, not willing to lynch into him. Toad also looks scummy because he's spewing nonsense and then telling me I'm dumb for taking him even remotely seriously. In the event that I manage to get lynched, he plays the "guys it was Day 1 I was just joking around" card. Toad's last post isn't particularly alignment indicative, and while a nice sentiment (no town reads), it ultimately lends more to my confirmation bias that he isn't actually helping town this game, he`s just posting and being active. why are you already talking about what might happen if you end up being lynched. Seriously that is a weird post you just did. You're telling me I'm setting up a d2 lynch (which I wasn't lol, not even setting up a d1 lynch yet) and now you get in here telling people that if you get lynched (why?) I'm playing some kind of card? That's the most backwards posting I've ever seen. I also never said you're dumb, I told you that I got a problem with one line of your posts and that you need to chill out after you got all mad at me for pointing that out. Should I not have mentioned it instead? What should my approach should have been? Ignore it? And seriously don't make it look like I'm insulting you because I'm not. I haven't insulted anyone in this game besides bugs. About the nice sentiment. I'm just posting instead of doing something? I posted it because I saw multiple people doing it so far and I don't like it, you say you don't like it either. So something's wrong. I'm trying to change that by posting it. If I had posted that without a reason like "sup guys, here's what we do" without anyone posting townreads that'd be something but there's a reason for that post and you're ignoring it, making it sound like I did it for fluff when clearly I'm trying to get people to STOP DOING IT, which according to you isn't anything?
I'm talking about what-ifs because people are taking the post where you call me out (+ Show Spoiler +On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly?
and they are using it as a reason to consider me scum, but you've gone on to say:
On January 03 2013 09:28 Toadesstern wrote:
-SNIP-
No need to read too much into everything like this Hopeless dude claiming I'm already setting up the lynch for d2,[irony] which obviously has to be the case here [/irony] :p
Effectively absolving yourself of any responsibility with regard to my potential lynch. This isn't a connection case because of bullshit like+ Show Spoiler +someone defended this guy from another's acusation and I think the first guy is scummy circular logic somethingsomething
, this is me seeing a scummy thing based on your backpedaling on calling me scum in a way that I find very suspicious.
|
On January 03 2013 12:35 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:25 Toadesstern wrote:On January 03 2013 12:16 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:45 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:38 yamato77 wrote:
What does anything these good mafia players say in the early game mean?
They basically just post to post. The only alignment indicative things they do in the game is lynch people. Or rather, try to lynch townies. This post is useless, quite like your suspicions against me. What would you like to hear from me yamato? Do you have any thoughts about the game that don't involve policy lynches? yeah, palmar looks more like scum to me than town, but again, not willing to lynch into him. Toad also looks scummy because he's spewing nonsense and then telling me I'm dumb for taking him even remotely seriously. In the event that I manage to get lynched, he plays the "guys it was Day 1 I was just joking around" card. Toad's last post isn't particularly alignment indicative, and while a nice sentiment (no town reads), it ultimately lends more to my confirmation bias that he isn't actually helping town this game, he`s just posting and being active. why are you already talking about what might happen if you end up being lynched. Seriously that is a weird post you just did. You're telling me I'm setting up a d2 lynch (which I wasn't lol, not even setting up a d1 lynch yet) and now you get in here telling people that if you get lynched (why?) I'm playing some kind of card? That's the most backwards posting I've ever seen. I also never said you're dumb, I told you that I got a problem with one line of your posts and that you need to chill out after you got all mad at me for pointing that out. Should I not have mentioned it instead? What should my approach should have been? Ignore it? And seriously don't make it look like I'm insulting you because I'm not. I haven't insulted anyone in this game besides bugs. About the nice sentiment. I'm just posting instead of doing something? I posted it because I saw multiple people doing it so far and I don't like it, you say you don't like it either. So something's wrong. I'm trying to change that by posting it. If I had posted that without a reason like "sup guys, here's what we do" without anyone posting townreads that'd be something but there's a reason for that post and you're ignoring it, making it sound like I did it for fluff when clearly I'm trying to get people to STOP DOING IT, which according to you isn't anything? I'm talking about what-ifs because people are taking the post where you call me out ( + Show Spoiler +On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? ) and they are using it as a reason to consider me scum, but you've gone on to say: Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 09:28 Toadesstern wrote:
-SNIP-
No need to read too much into everything like this Hopeless dude claiming I'm already setting up the lynch for d2,[irony] which obviously has to be the case here [/irony] :p Effectively absolving yourself of any responsibility with regard to my potential lynch. This isn't a connection case because of bullshit like + Show Spoiler +someone defended this guy from another's acusation and I think the first guy is scummy circular logic somethingsomething , this is me seeing a scummy thing based on your backpedaling on calling me scum in a way that I find very suspicious.
Well in that case let me get this straight: I did not intend to backpaddel at all. I still consider you somewhat scummy. I don't think the reasoning I've given is anywhere near enough to get you or anyone else lynched as it was mearly something that ticked me off as weird early on. I posted it because it's d1 and we want to create discussions.
So let it be known that I, Toad still think you're looking worse than most people in the thread as of now, 4 hours into the game.
Basicly a FoS just with reasoning provided and I'll be looking at your posts. I'll let you know if I consider you to be a decent lynch ahead of time and will try to not communicate too much with you for a while (beyond this point) to see yourself on your natural turf to see how you keep on playing when there's no reason for you to worsen your play due to possibly existing emotions towards myself because of what I said earlier on.
|
On January 03 2013 12:43 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:35 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 12:25 Toadesstern wrote:On January 03 2013 12:16 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:45 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 11:38 yamato77 wrote:
What does anything these good mafia players say in the early game mean?
They basically just post to post. The only alignment indicative things they do in the game is lynch people. Or rather, try to lynch townies. This post is useless, quite like your suspicions against me. What would you like to hear from me yamato? Do you have any thoughts about the game that don't involve policy lynches? yeah, palmar looks more like scum to me than town, but again, not willing to lynch into him. Toad also looks scummy because he's spewing nonsense and then telling me I'm dumb for taking him even remotely seriously. In the event that I manage to get lynched, he plays the "guys it was Day 1 I was just joking around" card. Toad's last post isn't particularly alignment indicative, and while a nice sentiment (no town reads), it ultimately lends more to my confirmation bias that he isn't actually helping town this game, he`s just posting and being active. why are you already talking about what might happen if you end up being lynched. Seriously that is a weird post you just did. You're telling me I'm setting up a d2 lynch (which I wasn't lol, not even setting up a d1 lynch yet) and now you get in here telling people that if you get lynched (why?) I'm playing some kind of card? That's the most backwards posting I've ever seen. I also never said you're dumb, I told you that I got a problem with one line of your posts and that you need to chill out after you got all mad at me for pointing that out. Should I not have mentioned it instead? What should my approach should have been? Ignore it? And seriously don't make it look like I'm insulting you because I'm not. I haven't insulted anyone in this game besides bugs. About the nice sentiment. I'm just posting instead of doing something? I posted it because I saw multiple people doing it so far and I don't like it, you say you don't like it either. So something's wrong. I'm trying to change that by posting it. If I had posted that without a reason like "sup guys, here's what we do" without anyone posting townreads that'd be something but there's a reason for that post and you're ignoring it, making it sound like I did it for fluff when clearly I'm trying to get people to STOP DOING IT, which according to you isn't anything? I'm talking about what-ifs because people are taking the post where you call me out ( + Show Spoiler +On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? ) and they are using it as a reason to consider me scum, but you've gone on to say: On January 03 2013 09:28 Toadesstern wrote:
-SNIP-
No need to read too much into everything like this Hopeless dude claiming I'm already setting up the lynch for d2,[irony] which obviously has to be the case here [/irony] :p Effectively absolving yourself of any responsibility with regard to my potential lynch. This isn't a connection case because of bullshit like + Show Spoiler +someone defended this guy from another's acusation and I think the first guy is scummy circular logic somethingsomething , this is me seeing a scummy thing based on your backpedaling on calling me scum in a way that I find very suspicious. Well in that case let me get this straight: I did not intend to backpaddel at all. I still consider you somewhat scummy. I don't think the reasoning I've given is anywhere near enough to get you or anyone else lynched as it was mearly something that ticked me off as weird early on. I posted it because it's d1 and we want to create discussions. So let it be known that I, Toad still think you're looking worse than most people in the thread as of now, 4 hours into the game. Basicly a FoS just with reasoning provided and I'll be looking at your posts. I'll let you know if I consider you to be a decent lynch ahead of time and will try to not communicate too much with you for a while (beyond this point) to see yourself on your natural turf to see how you keep on playing when there's no reason for you to worsen your play due to possibly existing emotions towards myself because of what I said earlier on.
Understood, and I'm not mad anymore. You'll get similar scrutiny from me, so we're on even terms in that regard. The votes on bugs still annoy me, but that's not alignment indicative (yet).
@Meapak any comment on why tunkeg?
|
thread died so I'm going to bed.
|
hopeless is getting lynched today right?
|
He's scared as shit that he has 1 vote on him.
|
Hi guys!
I'll take a look at the thread later tonight
Yours truly,
debears
|
On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off
On December 25 2012 14:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Merry Christmas TL Mafia!
Over the past 9 months, I've been going back through old games and putting together a mafia database. For each game, I have a record containing game details, the players to have played each game, their roles, and the whether they were lynched, killed, etc. I've put together a TL Mafia Library record for each game (excluding the summary/analysis). I may end up merging this entire post with the library sticky if I'm able to have access to the library account. Additionally, there is a list for each player for all the games they have played, their roles, and links to their filters. Hopefully this will come in handy for people who want an easy way to look for a game where player X was mafia or had a certain role. Finally, I put together a few fun statistics.
Special thanks to Meapak, Dirkzor, VisceraEyes, layabout and Marv for their help!
Mafia players are lynched 21.1% of the time on day one.
Random lynching would result in a mafia lynch 24.6% of the time.
44% of players playing in a newbie game have returned to play in at least 1 other game.
There have been 931 distinct mafia players.
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 13:53 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 14:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Merry Christmas TL Mafia!
Over the past 9 months, I've been going back through old games and putting together a mafia database. For each game, I have a record containing game details, the players to have played each game, their roles, and the whether they were lynched, killed, etc. I've put together a TL Mafia Library record for each game (excluding the summary/analysis). I may end up merging this entire post with the library sticky if I'm able to have access to the library account. Additionally, there is a list for each player for all the games they have played, their roles, and links to their filters. Hopefully this will come in handy for people who want an easy way to look for a game where player X was mafia or had a certain role. Finally, I put together a few fun statistics.
Special thanks to Meapak, Dirkzor, VisceraEyes, layabout and Marv for their help!
Mafia players are lynched 21.1% of the time on day one.
Random lynching would result in a mafia lynch 24.6% of the time.
44% of players playing in a newbie game have returned to play in at least 1 other game.
There have been 931 distinct mafia players.
Care to elaborate on what you're trying to imply here?
|
On January 03 2013 14:10 Adam4167 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 13:53 debears wrote:On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off On December 25 2012 14:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Merry Christmas TL Mafia!
Over the past 9 months, I've been going back through old games and putting together a mafia database. For each game, I have a record containing game details, the players to have played each game, their roles, and the whether they were lynched, killed, etc. I've put together a TL Mafia Library record for each game (excluding the summary/analysis). I may end up merging this entire post with the library sticky if I'm able to have access to the library account. Additionally, there is a list for each player for all the games they have played, their roles, and links to their filters. Hopefully this will come in handy for people who want an easy way to look for a game where player X was mafia or had a certain role. Finally, I put together a few fun statistics.
Special thanks to Meapak, Dirkzor, VisceraEyes, layabout and Marv for their help!
Mafia players are lynched 21.1% of the time on day one.
Random lynching would result in a mafia lynch 24.6% of the time.
44% of players playing in a newbie game have returned to play in at least 1 other game.
There have been 931 distinct mafia players. Care to elaborate on what you're trying to imply here?
Should be pretty clear. Random lynching is more successful than actual trying to lynch a scum by scumreads d1. You can't diss random lynching
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
