EPTlazermonkey scum
TL Mafia LVIII - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
lazermonkey scum | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
LOL | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 03 2013 16:33 thrawn2112 wrote: lazermonkey strongest scumread atm. talks about his vote as if it's meaningless...... ......and acts similarly with his tunkeg vote. That's absolutely wrong. Lazer go read town grush's filter in hero and let me know if you are willing to stand by that statement. LM also wants to kill kush because of meta reasons and I disagree with that. scum kush may be a little tricky to pick out but I think town kush is easily identifiable. Other than pushing policy lynches on players who aren't that hard to read when they're town, Lm hasn't been scumhunting. The closest he's come to scumhunting was his omgus fight with tunkeg and his last stance on that issue was wishy washy (a vote, that, self admittedly will change) stuff about specific phrasing/word choice + Show Spoiler + On January 03 2013 17:59 Lazermonkey wrote: I read through the thread quickly once and I must say hopeless looks bad. He has a scum read on Palmar, tho not willing to9 lynch him. And like Toad pointed out earlier, the way he is reacting to post just doesn't make alot of sense to me. In a bad way. "hopeless looks bad" is not what you say when you're town and think someone is scum, it's what a scum would think to themselves when trying to decide who they want to mislynch. same type of phrasing is used a couple sentences later with "doesn't make a lot of sense to me. In a bad way." It like he's giving us the entire translation process between picking on something to attack and spinning it to make it look like a real accusation. tunkeg stuff + Show Spoiler + I don't like the entire interaction between lm/tunkeg. LM starts by aggressively going after tunkeg (who I know has a good chance of being mislynched if town) but at the end of his attack qualifies his vote as "subject to change." Aren't all votes subject to change? Why does LM need to tell us this? In his very next post after the vote he says "Will also do a quick meta check on tunkeg to see if he always plays like this. I may consider swapping my vote then." Again, why say this? Why not just do the meta research and let the thread know about your conclusions when you reach them? Looks like he's setting himself up to unvote tunkeg before he even does his "research." Then he explains why tunkeg's meta this game is similar to his play in hero, and unvotes him. I wouldn't expect someone who is so aggressively attacking another player to be staved off by 1 game's worth of meta research. summary of his general play + Show Spoiler + -Starts off by being open to dumb policy lynches (grush and kush) -has an omgus fight with tunkeg which he quickly backs down on because of meta -switched to hopeless after tunkeg, then was open to lynching palmar before all the log stuff happened. there's this quote where he once again begins laying the groundwork for how he going to change his reads before he changes them: On January 04 2013 19:41 Lazermonkey wrote: Well, if he mananges to pull out a good case vs Marv I'm willing not to lynch him. - tunkeg/hopeless/palmar/marv... those are a mix of extremely bandwagony lynches and potential easy mislynches | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:42 Hopeless1der wrote: How do you feel about cc's promised, yet undelivered, reads don;t remember who it was but somebody pointed out the difference between scum cc and town cc, scum cc posts are much better quality. in witchcraft i thought cc was 100% scum because of how trollish/annoying/illogical his posts were and he ended up flipping town. if the point of lynching cc is to lynch a lurker i'd prefer selecting from people with lower content | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:56 Hopeless1der wrote: uhh, unless there was more, I remember it was kush, and thinking 'godamnit' to myself: so... you disagree with those reasons? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:57 Lazermonkey wrote: Agree with kush/thrawn on the CC. He can just as well be a lazy townie. are you not suspicious of me for this "bad case" I made against you? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 01:09 Vivax wrote: @ Thrawn I want to know why you said that town kush is easily identifiable in your post about LM. Do you think he is town in this game?How is he easily identifiable as town when he isn't as scum? already been over this when kush is town, it's way more obvious that he's town than it's obvious that he's scum when he's scum. especially lately, i think i'm very good about picking out town kush. that's why i dont like a kush policy lynch, cuz town kush isn't that hard to read. i don't really have much of a read on kush yet this game but i think when there are fewer players he'll be way easier to identify why is this something you have issue with? not relevant to the thread at all imo | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 04:36 Palmar wrote: No we're lynching Marv. @Marv, post your reads if you're somehow town before you die. You don't really have to if you're scum but you can do it anyway if you want to. Everyone else. do NOT last minute switch off marv, that'd be extremely dumb, even if BC is actually an excellent lynch. plz no? and explain the bolded part? i wanna lynch a lurker | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
does anyone on marv bandwagon want to lynch lazermonkey or + Show Spoiler + a lurker? if neither of those can happen i'm fine with lynching bc if it means we don't lynch marv and can't do either of the first two options | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
bonus question: say hypothetically (or not?) you and debears are scum. which of your other scumbuds do you two disagree with the most over what lynches to push? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 22:44 Djodref wrote: I have to look it up for marv. I've heard somewhere sometime that he had been bussing almost his whole scumteam in one game. But it's definitively true for kush, and it's also true for me. That's why I really don't think kush is scum in this game by the ay. how does this make sense? you don't think kush is scum because he's not bussing this game? how would you know if he's bussing o.0 | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 22:50 kushm4sta wrote: you already did it? bye. stop talking them please. kush is this your new scum meta? could you possibly be more anti-town? i'm not sensing the "fake rage" that comes along with scum kush but it seems like you are being intentionally uncooperative/unreadable you've done almost 0 independent scumhunting this game, the closest to scumhunting you've reached is your game long tunnel on marv. and most of that wasn't any type of scumhunting, it was either mindless sheeping or calling him scum over and over | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 23:02 Djodref wrote: Because he would post better cases. Because he would know what to look for. As scum, he would also defend townies. Because this guy loves being right above all. That's the real meta read on scum kush. there'd be no need for a scum kush to act like normal scum kush in this specific game. he's gone by almost unnoticed by saying marv is scum over and over | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 23:03 kushm4sta wrote: @thrawn I'm not going to have a conversation with you so don't ask me a dumb question like is this my new scum meta. just say if you think I'm scum and be done with it. that post perfectly matches my above description of your play: On January 05 2013 22:59 thrawn2112 wrote: kush is this your new scum meta? could you possibly be more anti-town? i'm not sensing the "fake rage" that comes along with scum kush but it seems like you are being intentionally uncooperative/unreadable so again, why so anti town? will you have a conversation with me if i call you scum? kush you're scum kush do you have any scumreads other than marv? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
i agree with clarity. in looney lynching he sat in the shadows as town except for whenever he got called out. then as he was no longer in danger of being lynched he went back to lazy mode | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 05 2013 23:37 Djodref wrote: I could lynch among Hopeless, Sentinel and MZ tomorrow. why hopeless and mz? i don't see anything about them in your filter | ||
| ||
