|
On October 11 2012 13:35 kushm4sta wrote:I scored super high on my PSATS national merit finalist and SATs. now i live at home with my parents and make 9.50 an hour. so really how well you do on your sats and what college you go to doesn't matter at all
I scored high enough to get to national merit semi finalist but I didn't make finalist because I slacked off on my grades. Even then I still had enough brownie points to get accepted into a good college but once again I took the lazy route and finished my first two semesters with a .27 gpa. So yes, doing good on psat/sat does help you get into a good school, and getting into a good school does help you. What hurts you is being lazy and not doing your work which is something that people unfortunately don't learn until it's too late.
|
|
|
still room?
/in
if not, /replacement i guess
|
i second that motion.
right this very second or jan 2nd works for me
|
hullo guys
still reading through but first gotta say that i don't understand/am frustrated by the wbg lynch talk. i think that either way palmar is just being dumb cuz he wants to be and i don't like basing my reads on 'discussion points' like that
|
hi yamato
On January 03 2013 08:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 08:41 iamperfection wrote:On January 03 2013 08:40 yamato77 wrote:
Outspoken player =/= scum. Palmar is overly active and has good reasons for the policy lynch.
Marv you know better so you starting this Palmar is scum stuff is fishy. what good reasons I agree that Bugs can get in the way of scumhunt when he is town and when scum is possibly highly difficult to catch. Basically the definition of a policy lynch. Complete coin flip. I'm not saying lynch Bugs but I can see where Palmar is coming from.
I don't see where a town palmar could *seriously* be coming from. I can see where he'd be coming from if the purpose is to start discussion but the idea that he could have a legitimate reason to policy lynch someone like wbg is crazy. yamato you are saying palmar's 'policy vote' makes palmar more likely to be town?
On January 03 2013 09:37 yamato77 wrote:
If your town meta is being a dick to other townies then you should rethink how you play this game.
Hopeless has been a zero presence poster. His only contribution is to tell other people that they are wasting time. He is worthy of my suspicion.
the bolded part reads as "I'm having to fake my scumreads"
|
the only person in the thread i don't have any concerns about is grush, go figure
chezinu a way better policy lynch than grush
|
lazermonkey strongest scumread atm.
talks about his vote as if it's meaningless......
On January 03 2013 08:40 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote:On January 03 2013 08:37 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 08:34 kushm4sta wrote:On January 03 2013 08:33 iamperfection wrote:On January 03 2013 08:27 kushm4sta wrote:
@iamp I didn't run away im lurking. do you feel like commenting on anything or do you plan on being useless? no to both ##Vote: kushm4staThis guy... let me give you some insight into kush. he says retarded things all the time regardless of alignment (regardless of being in game or not really). Change your mind at all? The game just started, and I'm perfectly okay with swapping my vote later on.
......and acts similarly with his tunkeg vote.
On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets...
That's absolutely wrong. Lazer go read town grush's filter in hero and let me know if you are willing to stand by that statement.
LM also wants to kill kush because of meta reasons and I disagree with that. scum kush may be a little tricky to pick out but I think town kush is easily identifiable.
Other than pushing policy lynches on players who aren't that hard to read when they're town, Lm hasn't been scumhunting. The closest he's come to scumhunting was his omgus fight with tunkeg and his last stance on that issue was wishy washy (a vote, that, self admittedly will change)
|
chezinu what are you saying? that you don't think debears is scummy?
that's great but who do you think is scummy?
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 16:41 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 16:33 thrawn2112 wrote:
scum kush may be a little tricky to pick out but I think town kush is easily identifiable.
makes no sense
"makes no sense" in a scummy way, or what? do you have a scumread on me?
|
On January 03 2013 16:47 kushm4sta wrote:if I'm easy to identify as town, then it follows that I would be just as easy to identify as scum
no.... the last few games where you;ve been town i've thought it was pretty obvious. in witchcraft i initially thought you were scum based off your opening posts but was less sure of that read
|
On January 03 2013 16:52 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 16:49 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 03 2013 16:47 kushm4sta wrote:On January 03 2013 16:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
uh... how if I'm easy to identify as town, then it follows that I would be just as easy to identify as scum no.... the last few games where you;ve been town i've thought it was pretty obvious. in witchcraft i initially thought you were scum based off your opening posts but was less sure of that read Are you a dt?
hmm lets keep everything on a need to know basis
surely those who follow the path of the brown can appreciate that sentiment?
|
hi smiley djo 
so you're against everything except a lurker vote? is there anyone you do want to lynch?
|
palmar do you have any thoughts about yamato/lazermonkey?
|
On January 03 2013 20:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
##Vote Jackal58
Lurker policy lynch go.
looks fun
##Vote Jackal58
|
clarity u no post to voting thread?
|
On January 04 2013 00:01 Vivax wrote:
I actually think I am doing a decent job. My only problem is that I need to continue the list and then make proper reads from it. But I am busy doing stoichiometry exercises before lessons begin again, I'll obey and post them too if Palmar orders.
I'd be quite content to kill tube. I'm not sure about this Bugs thing, I don't have that prejudice against him.
there's not really a 'bugs thing.' it's a silly policy lynch and you're either for it or against it.... not really that much to discuss or think about. You saying that you're "not sure" about it implies that you might be willing to go along with it. So are you for or against it?
|
so iamp/palm claim mason....
both scum - least likely option. too much risk, etc etc. this option is so dumb i'm removing it as a possibility
iamp scum - palmar town - same stuff that's been said, sending out a scum iamp to try and trick a town palmar is not something anyone here would try
that only leaves both town, or iamp town and palmar scum. from the start of the game i've been hoping that palmar will drop his act and do some stuff to make me think think he;s toiwn. idc about the delay between when he was asked for logs and when he produced them because I don't think that both of them can possibly be scum.
so iamp town, palmar scum or town?
I think palmar's town.
1 started off playing in a way that's likely to get him lynched
2 trolling wasn't as disruptive as people are implying
3 if i assume iamp is town and read the mason logs as if i'm iamp, makes me think palmar is town
|
On January 04 2013 23:30 froggynoddy wrote:
Oh and I refuse to see the logs as having any bearing on alignent on either iamp or Palmar.
The fact that:
1. Iamp conveniently didnt have the logs with him
2. Hours later Palmar refused to show the logs claiming (perhaps rightfully) that this this would not help town... I think this is true Day 1 as his reads, though convincing, are still based on just one days activity and noobs like me will feel strongly motivated to work on his assumptions rather than think for themselves.
3. Palmar finally gives up, even though he wasnt hugely at risk of a lynch.
This, truly, is some more narrative construction and I am not saying that the logs were necessarily faked, just that I would rather base any judgment on his thread activity which honestly... baffles me so I cant really say one way or another.
why would scum masons claim mason and not reveal logs till much later?
why would town masons claim mason and not reveal logs till much later?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
