EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 73
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
What scum would be reckless enough to say shit like that? Think of the level of mindgames required for dao to be scum. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
 I think he's a mislynch and I advise other people who don't want him lynched to put him as far down in your list as need be. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Austin talking more about mementoss VE talking more about austin mementoss talking about why he backed down off of austin's case, and if he still wants to lynch da0/djo | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 18 2012 20:11 thrawn2112 wrote: Ok here are some things I want to see before lynch Austin talking more about mementoss We haven't had enough of this already? | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 14 2012 01:03 Mementoss wrote: Yeah it would, but the hosts don't seem to keen on it so Im not sure. This post, regardless of his alignment, tells us that mementoss was of the opinion that ON is not going to be replaced. In other words, mementoss thought that ON was going to be modkilled. Why as town, would you want to vote for somebody who is going to be modkilled? It serves no purpose, unless you think the opposing candidate is town... which mementoss didn't. So it makes absolutely no sense for town mementoss to vote for ON, if he thinks that Sand is scummy (which he did) and if he thinks ON will be modkilled. Why would scum mementoss want to vote for ON, who he thinks is going to be modkilled? To gain towncred after the flip. Mementoss actually gives a close description of what I'm talking about here: On October 15 2012 20:48 Mementoss wrote: Also, I'm gunna try to shy away from the connection cases with ON. Simply for the fact that ON was the perfect bus target. He was useless, and inactive so was guaranteed to get lynched eventually and gave easy town credibility on any one voting him. It also gives scum a chance who voted him, to shift the attention off themselves by using oh he voted for ON not to move on in this matchup, SCUM SCUM. So yeah, I'll take it into account when reading filters, but I think ON was probably bussed. Here's a recap of what I'm trying to say: Mementoss though sandroba was scummy. Mementoss thought ON was a null read. Mementoss thought ON was going to be modkilled. Mementoss votes for the null read who he thinks will be modkilled, instead of using his vote on the guy he thought was scummy? | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On October 18 2012 20:52 thrawn2112 wrote: I was going through filters and this post caught my eye: This post, regardless of his alignment, tells us that mementoss was of the opinion that ON is not going to be replaced. In other words, mementoss thought that ON was going to be modkilled. Why as town, would you want to vote for somebody who is going to be modkilled? It serves no purpose, unless you think the opposing candidate is town... which mementoss didn't. So it makes absolutely no sense for town mementoss to vote for ON, if he thinks that Sand is scummy (which he did) and if he thinks ON will be modkilled. Why would scum mementoss want to vote for ON, who he thinks is going to be modkilled? To gain towncred after the flip. Mementoss actually gives a close description of what I'm talking about here: Here's a recap of what I'm trying to say: Mementoss though sandroba was scummy. Mementoss thought ON was a null read. Mementoss thought ON was going to be modkilled. Mementoss votes for the null read who he thinks will be modkilled, instead of using his vote on the guy he thought was scummy? I never said I expected him to be modkilled, I just said the hosts weren't keen on replacing. AKA it wasn't happeneing in day1/night1. Who would expect a modkill with a replacement list that already has 2 people in it? Im sure I probably implied it was possible, but why would you as town want to rely on host actions that are impossible to speculate about or ask about. I was just playing the game expecting no host interactions. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
so wtf else would have been possible | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On October 18 2012 21:01 thrawn2112 wrote: that's just my read of your thoughts behind that post. and I don't see how "not replaced" doesn't equal "modkilled" so wtf else would have been possible no action at all? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
If i had to guess, I would guess ON was going to get modkilled and I think scum knew that already. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 18 2012 21:03 kushm4sta wrote: @thrawn really good job improving your scum play since I called you out on it BTW If you're going to admit to ignoring everything I say then you may as well claim scum... you can't possibly be 100% convinced that I'm scum so either go ahead and claim scum or stop acting like scum kush. + Show Spoiler + And yes your post did serve as a wake up call. I've had kinda a shitty game and I haven't been taking it too seriously, especially after the D1 flip. I think yesterday or so was the first time I've been truly sober since the game's started. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 18 2012 21:13 thrawn2112 wrote: If you're going to admit to ignoring everything I say then you may as well claim scum... you can't possibly be 100% convinced that I'm scum so either go ahead and claim scum or stop acting like scum kush. + Show Spoiler + And yes your post did serve as a wake up call. I've had kinda a shitty game and I haven't been taking it too seriously, especially after the D1 flip. I think yesterday or so was the first time I've been truly sober since the game's started. How am I ignoring everything you say? Actually I am paying attention to everything you say moreso than anyone else. Also you are creating a double standard here. You say you are going to ignore me so you can get back to scumhunting, but when I don't answer one of your questions then I'm suddenly scum? To answer your queston: daoud is more of a null read then a town read. Honestly I am stumped with how interpret his behavior. I would be more surprised if he flipped scum than if he flipped town though. My list as it stands is not taking into account who is going to get lynched. If i have to change it later somehow to ensure the lynch of austin and prevent the lynch of daoud, I will. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 18 2012 21:23 thrawn2112 wrote: Oh and the passive aggressive name dropping shit is annoying too but no reason to comment on that either. Can you comment on it real quick because I have no idea what it is that you are talking about? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On October 18 2012 20:29 Mementoss wrote: i cant believe djo is making a case on VE for lurking when the player got replaced. I mean, use your head, he got replaced because he had no time to post or lost interest. @Mementoss I don't understand how the following is a case about kurking... On October 18 2012 16:59 Djodref wrote: Did you check his filter ? D1/N1
D2/N2
I'm just realizing that VE wants to lynch austin. I don't know what to think about this... Could have have some honest comments on these points ? | ||
| ||
