Aperture Mafia 2: Portal Edition - Page 6

On October 06 2012 05:16 JingleHell wrote:


IIRC he did mention a night action before then, but he also said it went through and that was all he was saying.

Was ambiguous the first time.

On October 06 2012 05:20 ghost_403 wrote:


This response is so wrong there's no justification for it from a town point of view.

Let's take a moment to examine what was said here:

• Any unclaimed shot must be anti-town
  
• Unquestioning belief that Draz is telling the truth
  
• More blue fishing
  
• Stuff that was just plain wrong
  

There are reasons why unclaimed shots might have been from someone in the town. For example, Lord Kanti's KP from Aperture Mafia. Based on the flips that have already occured this game, I don't think that it's irrational to assume that a role with KP doesn't have some other stuff associated with it. The fact that Draz didn't immediately claim his shot doesn't imply that he's scum.

That second part about the busdriver is (a) wrong and (b) blue fishing. In the event of a busdriver, 98% of the time, the person performing the action isn't notified of a bussing. Therefore, Draz would not know that he had bussed, and wouldn't have known to claim that he shot S+B. And why on earth are you implying that there's a town busdriver to begin with? Why do you keep fishing for blues?

As town, you should know better than to spout off stuff like this. You would have taken a step back and realized that this post doesn't accomplish anything other than create more chaos while people discuss why you are completely wrong. Town gonzaw is better than this.

On October 05 2012 13:49 gonzaw wrote:
Please make points about me being scum that don't have anything to do with you or "starting fights" with you or "insulting" you or discrediting you or "misinterpreting" you.

I won't ask you again.

On October 08 2012 01:26 JingleHell wrote:
Switch your vote until/unless he explains it, Austin, so that it's securely off Draz if Gonzaw refuses to explain the recent development stuff.

After all, he should be totally cool with the threat of "Explain or get lynched", he threw it at me earlier this game.

On October 08 2012 01:19 Drazerk wrote:
Well Mattchews purposely lurking so you all ignore him.

S+B is blinded by rage

Hiro is probably AFK

Austin is probably scum and will go for the easy lynch

Gonzaw won't vote himself

Kei I really don't care about

Shame that activity is the bane of this game and your about to kill one of the most active players.

On October 08 2012 02:04 JingleHell wrote:


I'm more nervous about Hiro's invisibility than Mattchew's. Mattchew said he got a HotS invite right before he vanished, Hiro has just said almost nothing memorable all game. That sets off more of my "scum" alarms than anything else.

As for why we'd want the lynch off Draz, I want it off him because Gonzaw has done several things recently that can literally ONLY benefit scum (make us look for less scum than there most likely are, act like he expects a townflip off Draz, his SNB+Keir plan that either sets up a block-free shot, or allows SNB+Keir, if they were scum, which I doubt, to withhold a shot and get free confirmed townie status). One of those things suggests Draz might well be town if Gonzaw flips scum. Avoiding a potential mislynch with scum grabbing town cred off the back of it scenario doesn't seem like a bad idea.

Especially after how bad me chasing useless people in PTP3 went, I'm trying to chase scummy behavior first. Smacking down trolls/lurkers/etc. has to be a concerted effort with early game policy lynches.

On October 08 2012 08:04 JingleHell wrote:


Or maybe you just knew in advance, which is why you staged that cute little change of heart, and started creating all that "what if" discussion, like I said.