Aperture Mafia 2: Portal Edition - Page 21

On October 02 2012 09:52 JingleHell wrote:
Luckily, Gonzaw is an arrogant dipshit who forgets that while he was wishy-washy tunneling me, he was actually just throwing around throwaway votes and has no room to "I told you so" anyone, or expect to be treated as town for his vote.

Let's get him tomorrow, gents.

Or am I supposed to ignore his tone in his post and bathe in good feelings because he agreed that I'm town while he spewed all sorts of shit?

Let's get him tomorrow, gents.

On October 02 2012 10:34 gonzaw wrote:


"Town you impress me" is kind of the opposite of "I told you so".
Hell I expected it to be a misslynch (I even said so myself) so I'm very impressed. If people had done what I told them to they would have lynched you and (unfortunately) you would have flipped town most likely.

Please read carefully before posting.
Also I'm not an "arrogant dipshit" and that's the most ironic statement I've seen in TL mafia.
Again, carefully read my post, specially the part where I give you advice.



No. Calm down, read the thread carefully, stop being so biased and arrogant and think.
After you've done that come back and consider lynching me again. I won't take you seriously until you do

---

@S&B: Dude, start posting NOW or I'll do everything in my power to kill you.
If I can ever be justified in tunneling the hell out of you in any game we play together it's in this one. You only have 7 freaking posts, 4 of them having less than 3 lines.

---

@Crossfire: You know, the fact that you forgot it's plurality lynch and not majority lynch actually makes you look worse, since you parked your vote on iamperfection and left. If you were scum maybe you thought there would be a NL so you thought iamperfection was safe before disappearing.

Is this the case? I don't know. If you don't give more thorough reads and actively participate in discussion while giving your thoughts on things discussed and your thought process (<-most important one) I and the rest of town can't know for sure.

On October 02 2012 10:34 gonzaw wrote:
@Crossfire: You know, the fact that you forgot it's plurality lynch and not majority lynch actually makes you look worse, since you parked your vote on iamperfection and left. If you were scum maybe you thought there would be a NL so you thought iamperfection was safe before disappearing.

Is this the case? I don't know. If you don't give more thorough reads and actively participate in discussion while giving your thoughts on things discussed and your thought process (<-most important one) I and the rest of town can't know for sure.

On October 02 2012 10:13 Crossfire99 wrote:
Oh, I also think this makes ghost town because there's no way a scum would attack his own, so early and leave his vote on him all day despite people trying to convince him otherwise.

On October 02 2012 11:05 austinmcc wrote:

ghost didn't vote iamperfection...

On October 02 2012 11:08 Crossfire99 wrote:
I mean the first person that iamperfection attacks hard and sticks with all day is ghost. I think that is good reason for ghost being town.

On October 02 2012 11:09 austinmcc wrote:

reading it like this makes remarkably more sense.

On October 02 2012 05:36 ghost_403 wrote:
Something's off about austin's play this game. I dunno what. I can't put my finger on it, and I have no idea why. I think I'm going to read a few of his previous games.

I'm still happy trying to lynch Keirathi today. After his initial case on Mattchew, he's done more or less no analysis this game. If looking through austin's previous games doesn't yield anything interesting, I might spend a bit more time staring at Keirathi's filter and write up my thoughts on it.

IMP doesn't read like scum to me at a moment. I didn't see anything substantial in the cases presented in the thread to change my mind on that at the moment.

On October 02 2012 10:48 JingleHell wrote:


The only irony here is that you start talking shit (which, thankfully, came well AFTER I pointed to your earlier, lighter efforts at inflammation) and then act like I'm being unreasonable when I turn it around on you.

Oh, and maybe the fact that you're trying to use my defense that you clearly hated against me now. QQ much? No, you're caught, give it up. It wouldn't be the first time that a soft bus wasn't enough to buy someone town cred. Byebye.

On October 02 2012 11:31 gonzaw wrote:


You are not making any sense Jingle.
Although good job in convincing me you are bad town rather than scum
I guess that means you are not actually playing that "bad"? >_>
Hell if I know.

On October 02 2012 11:27 gonzaw wrote:
iamperfection didn't put too much effort in trying to get ghost lynched. He made that initial vote, and then argued a little bit when he was called out, but never did anything to try and get ghost lynched (for instance, he never came back to the thread to defend himself and try to convince people to vote for ghost).

He could have easily tried to bus ghost and then not do anything since pushing ghost would mean ghost would get lynched, meaning scum lose 1 member anyways.

Although the possibility that he made an easy case on an easy town target is also plausible.
Either way, take it with a grain of salt. Analyze ghost by his behaviour alone and not by having an ambigious link to iamperfection.

---

About ghost:
(Disclaimer: This isn't supposed to be a case against him or anything. I just want to point out some stuff I want some feedback on since I'm not sure if he's scum or not (although he's a possibility, just like when I added him to that previous list).)

I'd want some discussion on ghost, who I'm torn about and think could be scum (although his attitude at times feels too overconfident to be one).



This is the only thing he mentions about iamp.
He doesn't mention at all the fact that iamperfection had a half-assed case on him.
I find this weird...since anybody would be alert to anybody FoSing them, specially if it's because of bad reasons.
For instance, it took me, Mattchew and others to "defend" ghost, but never ghost himself.
He doesn't even try to defend himself or acknowledge there's someone voting him, which is odd as hell no matter what alignement iamperfection had.
I'd like ghost to tell us why he didn't even bother to acknowledge people's votes/suspicions on him.

Him going after Keirathi seems weird to me too, since I thought Keirathi was pretty apparent town at that point and it seemed ghost ignored the things that made him so just to attack him and form a late bandwagon on him.
Although the more I think about it the more I think that there may be players out there that just don't play similarly to me and look at different things to find scum and ignore some others (i.e there's a possibility ghost legitimately thought his case was good)

---

Anyways, feedback would be appreciated.

I'll try not to flood the thread with "I'm not sure about X, so here's a "semi" case against him, and here's a "semi"-defense against him" walls of text, since I know people don't seem too fond of them and ignore them and then label me as scum for being "wishy-washy" or something
However, any additional information that can make us figure out someone else's alignement is useful.

Instead of thinking it like "here's a case I'm making against ghost/etc" think of it as "I found this interesting thing, what do you think about it?".
Hopefully there are no more misunderstandings regarding my play in the future.