|
On October 02 2012 12:33 austinmcc wrote: How are you going to say that node defended shady, which you liked because it matched what you were doing all day.
no. his attacking kush is what i have been doing all day.
|
Why would you vote for a lurker who is getting replaced? It makes no sense to me.
Most of shadys scuminess comes from his lurking. His troll act did not seem scummy we can agree on this.
|
On October 02 2012 12:41 kushm4sta wrote: Why would you vote for a lurker who is getting replaced? It makes no sense to me.
Most of shadys scuminess comes from his lurking. His troll act did not seem scummy we can agree on this.
Why is he lurking and how can you be so sure that he will get replaced?
|
He's lurking presumably because he doesn't want to play or doesn't have the time. I think he's probably going to be replaced because the host said he was gonna replace a bunch of people? Also shady hasn't voted yet. If he votes last minute that will be hella scummy sure but I doubt it's going to happen.
|
|
i don't like what i see in boson's filter. he jumps around like a pinball and has very strange logic for doing so (if he has any at all).
|
Day 1 Vote Count
Shady Sands (9): Marvellosity, Coagulation, kushm4sta, Risen, iamperfection, Mementoss, risk.nuke, austinmcc, ShiaoPi, kushm4sta, BroodKingEXE, Node, kingjames01, slOosh, mkfuba07
kingjames01 (2): keirathi, mkfuba07, kreb, marvellosity, VisceraEyes, Mattchew, kushm4sta, austinmcc, Z-Boson
kushm4sta (1): Node, Mementoss, annul
VisceraEyes (1): Talismania, Z-Boson
Mementoss (0): kingjames01
austinmcc (2): kreb, mkfuba07, BloodyC0bbler
risk.nuke (1): Sharrant
Node (6): Marvellosity, VisceraEyes, austinmcc, kushm4sta, Z-Boson, iamperfection, BroodKingEXE, kingjames01
Coagulation (1): Z-Boson
The following players have not voted: AdmiralAardvark, Shady Sands,
Friendly reminder to use the Voting Thread to have your vote counted. It's 30 minutes till deadline. Shady Sands is set to be lynched.
|
i am going to see if this works.
##unvote ##vote z-boson
|
On October 02 2012 12:36 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2012 12:33 slOosh wrote: Guh didn't realize how much time I actually take to read. Between Node and Shady Sands I'm leaning Shady.
With a total lack of follow through after his troll antics, he has disrupted early day discussion and dropped off. Not lynching him today on the basis of a potential modkill is stupid - he could easily trade his life for hurting day 2 discussion as well and he might not even be lynched.
The nature of the Node lynch is really strange. Reason enough to lean the former.
##Vote: Shady Sands Node lynch is "strange." Is Node himself scummy? Are Node's posts scummy? Node is scummy. I think what you found about his post was valid. However we can only lynch 1 at a time and I find Shady a better target for the reasons I stated. The strangeness of Node's lynch was that there was a disconnect between the push and the votes - you tossed out a bunch of names and his was just picked up. It's enough to sway me to Shady.
|
I urge some people to move off shady and onto node.
If he is playing scum he probably wouldn't just allow himself to be replaced like this. What if we get someone super active and awesome instead of him? He's definitely going to be PROBABLY replaced, possibly modkilled.
Kill node instead. Node has been after me indiscriminately. As the weakest, scummiest meta, active player I am very good scumbait..low hanging fruit. He has contributed nothing helpful in his filter. See other people's arguments.
|
i agree shady is not the kill. he will be modkilled/replaced and we can get a better read off his replacement anyway.
however, node is not the kill either. look at boson's filter compared to node's. that's the kill i think.
|
On October 02 2012 12:50 kushm4sta wrote: I urge some people to move off shady and onto node.
If he is playing scum he probably wouldn't just allow himself to be replaced like this. What if we get someone super active and awesome instead of him? He's definitely going to be PROBABLY replaced, possibly modkilled.
Kill node instead. Node has been after me indiscriminately. As the weakest, scummiest meta, active player I am very good scumbait..low hanging fruit. He has contributed nothing helpful in his filter. See other people's arguments.
So you want us to lynch someone because he's been pushing you? That doesn't prove that he's mafia.
|
annul we got less than 10 minutes lol..z boson is not happening
|
On October 02 2012 12:52 kingjames01 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2012 12:50 kushm4sta wrote: I urge some people to move off shady and onto node.
If he is playing scum he probably wouldn't just allow himself to be replaced like this. What if we get someone super active and awesome instead of him? He's definitely going to be PROBABLY replaced, possibly modkilled.
Kill node instead. Node has been after me indiscriminately. As the weakest, scummiest meta, active player I am very good scumbait..low hanging fruit. He has contributed nothing helpful in his filter. See other people's arguments. So you want us to lynch someone because he's been pushing you? That doesn't prove that he's mafia.
It's not about proving anyone is mafia. It's about choosing the best option.
|
On October 02 2012 12:53 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2012 12:52 kingjames01 wrote:On October 02 2012 12:50 kushm4sta wrote: I urge some people to move off shady and onto node.
If he is playing scum he probably wouldn't just allow himself to be replaced like this. What if we get someone super active and awesome instead of him? He's definitely going to be PROBABLY replaced, possibly modkilled.
Kill node instead. Node has been after me indiscriminately. As the weakest, scummiest meta, active player I am very good scumbait..low hanging fruit. He has contributed nothing helpful in his filter. See other people's arguments. So you want us to lynch someone because he's been pushing you? That doesn't prove that he's mafia. It's not about proving anyone is mafia. It's about choosing the best option.
I might buy that if your main reason for targetting him is that he that he targetted you.
|
On October 02 2012 12:52 kushm4sta wrote: annul we got less than 10 minutes lol..z boson is not happening
we have 22 minutes. node got 8 votes in 12. anything can happen.
|
EBWOP:
On October 02 2012 12:53 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2012 12:52 kingjames01 wrote:On October 02 2012 12:50 kushm4sta wrote: I urge some people to move off shady and onto node.
If he is playing scum he probably wouldn't just allow himself to be replaced like this. What if we get someone super active and awesome instead of him? He's definitely going to be PROBABLY replaced, possibly modkilled.
Kill node instead. Node has been after me indiscriminately. As the weakest, scummiest meta, active player I am very good scumbait..low hanging fruit. He has contributed nothing helpful in his filter. See other people's arguments. So you want us to lynch someone because he's been pushing you? That doesn't prove that he's mafia. It's not about proving anyone is mafia. It's about choosing the best option.
I might buy that if your main reason for targetting him wasn't that he targetted you first.
|
Day 1 Vote Count
Shady Sands (9): Marvellosity, Coagulation, kushm4sta, Risen, iamperfection, Mementoss, risk.nuke, austinmcc, ShiaoPi, kushm4sta, BroodKingEXE, Node, kingjames01, slOosh, mkfuba07
kingjames01 (2): keirathi, mkfuba07, kreb, marvellosity, VisceraEyes, Mattchew, kushm4sta, austinmcc, Z-Boson
kushm4sta (0): Node, Mementoss, annul
VisceraEyes (1): Talismania, Z-Boson
Mementoss (0): kingjames01
austinmcc (2): kreb, mkfuba07, BloodyC0bbler
risk.nuke (1): Sharrant
Node (6): Marvellosity, VisceraEyes, austinmcc, kushm4sta, Z-Boson, iamperfection, BroodKingEXE, kingjames01
Coagulation (1): Z-Boson
Z-Boson (1): annul
The following players have not voted: AdmiralAardvark, Shady Sands,
Friendly reminder to use the Voting Thread to have your vote counted. It's 15 minutes till deadline. Shady Sands is set to be lynched.
|
Ugh, this is driving me crazy. I'm not a huge fan of any of the possibilities...
I'm going to change my vote again. If we can get a better replacement for Shady I think keeping him in is going to be better than keeping Node in. I got completely screwed in DN Mafia because it was down to Node, myself, another pretty inactive player, and scum marv, and there was no discussion. I don't want to be in that situation again.
Not sure if this will do anything, but:
##Unvote ##Vote Node
|
|
|
|
|