EPT##vote node
Liquid City Mafia - Page 26
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
##vote node | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9640 Posts
| ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
##Vote Node | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9640 Posts
## vote node | ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
Good points better than a hit on amodkill. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:04 Z-BosoN wrote: Omfg austin really loves me. I'm just going to ignore you this time, I make an oath that your bad arguments will bother me no more. You also seem a lot more scummy this game. At least on LVII your arguments made sense, from an ape's perspective. Right now you just seem desperate. I, Z-BosoN, solemnly swear, to never defend myself from austin's scrutiny ever again. A few people mention offhand that they want to see more from Node. You are the ONLY person to reference something he said and use it maybe in an argument. He's got a single post five+ hours before you mention him, and yet you just make this offhand remark about what he said. I don't find YOU overtly scummy this game. But that remark was one of the top 2 strangest things in the thread. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
@Austin you say that his defense of shady has nothing to do with when shady disappeared. However, part of the reason node defended shady was because he was scumhunting, which he was doing somewhat before he disappeared. So the fact that the defense of him was before shady's disappearance does matter. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
By my count it's 7 votes for Node and 6 for Shady Sands at the moment. I'll put myself out there and add extra weight to the Node lynch. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:10 annul wrote: this node push seems VERY forced, wtf it seems like it's forced by a lack of good lynch targets not by scum necessarily | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:10 annul wrote: this node push seems VERY forced, wtf Define this statement please. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:15 kingjames01 wrote: Okay, I didn't like Shady Sand's lynch anyway. By my count it's 7 votes for Node and 6 for Shady Sands at the moment. I'll put myself out there and add extra weight to the Node lynch. NOTE: I was wrong. It was 7 to 5 at that time. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:17 annul wrote: its happening extremely fast extremely easily and with no resistance. I don't exactly like drawing the conclusion that easy lynches = not scum. Maybe that is what scum wants you to think? I understand not wanting to waste a lynch since Shady is apparently to be modkilled, though. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:12 kushm4sta wrote: + Show Spoiler +I dont regret voting for nodes but I also didn't see any good arguments really. @Austin you say that his defense of shady has nothing to do with when shady disappeared. However, part of the reason node defended shady was because he was scumhunting, which he was doing somewhat before he disappeared. So the fact that the defense of him was before shady's disappearance does matter. On September 30 2012 13:54 Shady Sands wrote: Yes! Thank goodness the gambit worked. The whole plan was either to troll hard and have some fun, or enjoy a serious, non-troll game of Mafia by inciting the mod to explicitly threaten a modkill for trolling and scare all the trolls into the straight and narrow. Shiao, you can thank me after the game is over. With that being said, I find the easy rando-vote at the beginning highly suspicious. ## Unvote ## Vote Z-Boson Explain your rando-vote without trolling as a factor. On September 30 2012 14:14 Shady Sands wrote: Hmmmm here Z-Boson soft defends kush Then kush follows by sheeping his vote ##FoS Kush On October 01 2012 17:40 Node wrote: I don't think Shady Sands is scum -- at least, not given what we've seen so far. His "trolling" antics were silly, but they weren't scummy. If he were scum, I don't think he would've dropped the trolling pretext so quickly, and I certainly don't think he would be willing to reappear and start pushing targets. Node just notes that he doesn't think Shady would reappear and start pushing targets. Shady doesn't really PUSH anyone. He votes Z-BosoN for a random vote, then asks Z-Boson to explain the vote. He thinks kush is connected to Z-Boson because of a "soft defense" and vote (And iirc, someone pointed out after this that Z-BosoN had already moved the vote that kush "sheeped"). Shady didn't push anyone. Shady voted a guy while asking him to explain himself, then made some weird connection concerning sheeping that didn't exist. II disagree that Shady was actually scumhunting here (even if he's somehow town, this wasn't scumhunting) and I think Node is completely misrepresenting what Shady was doing when he says it was "pushing targets" | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
"I've been hoarding this Node case since he made his second post. I was afraid to post it but..." -scumAustin "DO IT!!!" -scumVE and scumMarv in unison "But what if they..." "DO IT!!!!" | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
 | ||
| ||
