Liquid City Mafia - Page 23

On October 01 2012 13:17 Shady Sands wrote:
In response to trolling: I think people are drastically overblowing the following post:



How is that a lie, Marv? I explicitly said I was trolling even though on the very first page DrH told GRush to eff off for presumed trolliness. I knew this was going to get me a high chance of being modkilled. But given that there are people who are possibly smurfing for others here, there's still a risk that trolls are here, so I wanted to play that way to make sure no one dared to troll... or at least I could abuse tolerance for trolls to the same extent as others.

Now reading through filters

On October 01 2012 11:13 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Shady Sands seems to be similar in popularity to the Mattchew lynch from last game (mafia LVII)

However I see a major difference like no major scumslip. Also given that near everyone seems content on him being a choice (although no real major voting), I am not inclined to lynch him until he posts more to get a better read.

I would however like to see more from (surprise) Mattchew at this moment.

Given his ballsy play last game, and the fact that my experience with him is that he is slightly more confident a player, I am not very impressed with his current play this game. It feels too underwhelming from my experience with him. If I am wrong I do apologize on this, but he has only really justified the behaviour of Shady, and asked people for their opinions.

Not a lot to go on, and very non commital.

I would like to see more posting from both these players, as well as seeing a more from sloosh and marvel so I can solidify a read on them.

On October 02 2012 06:35 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Looking through the thread the only people who stand out as people I would want to lynch today are austin, risk, and mattchew.

On October 02 2012 07:16 BloodyC0bbler wrote:And you don't seem to want to discuss him at all:
As for what I want to accomplish? Ideally a dead mafia, realistically I would like to salvage some of day 1 by giving it some content that isn't rehashed "i want to off KJ, Kush or Shady"

On October 01 2012 17:40 Node wrote:
I don't think Shady Sands is scum -- at least, not given what we've seen so far. His "trolling" antics were silly, but they weren't scummy. If he were scum, I don't think he would've dropped the trolling pretext so quickly, and I certainly don't think he would be willing to reappear and start pushing targets.

On October 02 2012 08:57 ShiaoPi wrote:
Hmm..woke up and caught up for now.

Shady still has not responded to questions and basically has not done anything, which makes me want to lynch him right now, but he seems to be bound to be modkilled anyway. For now though: ##vote: Shady Sands

KJ's read on Mementoss is kind of a lazy way out as he was lurking at the time of the read.
Did Mementoss' recent posting change your read kingjames?

In regards to the other lynch-candidates:
Kush would have been pretty high in my scumlist, but he looks like his town meta that was linked earlier.

I have no clue about reading VE, but he looks alright to me, nothing screams scum.

On austin I am kind of split, but I would prefer to not lynch him today because he is quite an asset to town (if he is town aligned of course). While his absence and stuff had been worrying I would suggest waiting for day 2 on him.

On October 02 2012 09:09 ShiaoPi wrote:


Did you read the linked stuff? It is pretty easy to come to the conclusion I did in my opinion. Suit yourself though if you do not believe me.

On October 02 2012 09:10 marvellosity wrote:
You should care about meta reads, they help me to far more correct calls than incorrect ones

On October 02 2012 08:29 Sharrant wrote:
@Risk



Yes. I told you, I got up early to make a post. I spent an hour going through filters and writing that post.

Anyways, I'm not talking any more about anything even related to my previous activity level, it's pointless.

So, onto the important stuff.

On Austin: Austin seems quite scummy to me, with almost all of his posts having been focused on KJ using "spy" instead of scum. I agree that it threw me at first, and I was pretty suspicious because of it (see my earlier post). That was his only bit of scum hunting though, was going after him for saying spy. Yes, he unvoted him after that, but never tried to pick up on anyone else after. He asks for opinions about Shady and Kush's play, but doesn't feel the need to write a word about them in return.

I'm giving him leeway for now because Marv said that his play thus far has been according to his meta, and that's something I'll trust him about. If his posting doesn't improve by day 2 though, I think he'd be looking like a nice target to lynch.


@everyone
Can someone please tell me if Risk is usually this agressive? I've never played with him before, but he seems kind of off the rails at this point. I'm suspicious of him, but especially since his last post I'm thinking that he just gets really emotional when he plays.

On Risk:
You just kind of suggest a lynch on Kush without explaining or even mentioning suspicions of him. Then you make a post about KJ and vote Shady, again without explaining or even mentioning suspicions of him. Then your case on me is entirely "I assume he's been following the thread". THat's it. THe end. You took no exception with anything I said, didn't see anything wrong or misinterepreted, taken out of context or distorted to call me out on. You just said "Hey, he made a long post as his first post. Scum for sure". Apparently so scummy that you would prefer to drop Shady, KJ and Kush all just to lynch me if more people were around.

At this point, I think you're scum. I'd love to be wrong, if you can link me to some of your past games, that'd be great. Maybe this just is standard to how you play, and someone will let me know, but I think you're scummy.

##vote Risk.Nuke

I'll have another post up either at or a little after the night post, with reads on a few more people.

On October 02 2012 09:12 Risen wrote:


Really? What's my town meta vs scum meta?

Seems to me like I've been able to use "meta" in the past to hide and make people think I'm town. Seems to me like ANYONE with half a brain can just "act like their meta" and "poof!" towny.

On October 02 2012 08:42 kingjames01 wrote:


This is a good point. With annul it's kind of hard to tell usually. Sometimes mafia annul gets through the early days by flying under the radar and showing up every now and then to vote.

If it continues, then I would be very wary of trusting anything he says because he is really good at amplifying flaws in logical arguments.

On October 02 2012 09:19 annul wrote:


lol wat

explain to me how the premise where "annul shows up to vote and generally plays a passive game" goes to the conclusion of "therefore, be very wary of trusting anything he says?"

as for my passivity, read my last like 6 game where i go hardcore aggressive as all three colors and get lynched or killed by day 2 pretty consistently. i am trying to change it up as to not have that happen to me. this is not a red tell. this is not a tell for any color.

On October 02 2012 09:26 kingjames01 wrote:
It fits how you're playing so far this game but it doesn't mean you're scum. It could also mean you're Town.