|
Not interested right now. You 're the one who said this: In fact, I'd expect scum to be the people most willing to be jumping on BH's case without so much as a thought. Namely austinmcc and mementoss
It's understandable that he'd defend his vote as not being "too early". I don't see anything wrong with what he said about austin.
|
@HiroPro:
On September 18 2012 08:23 HiroPro wrote:BH - Mad MenI wanna lynch goodkarma. That first post of his is really cautious (barely pressures BH even though he calls out a perceived contradiction and then calls prplhz's play scummy but doesn't throw a vote down on it) He then proceeds to bring up a point of discussion (lynching lurkers), which he himself admits likely won't happen this game. ##Vote goodkarma
Just to let you know, I very rarely vote early day one. Feel free to consider that a scumtell if you want. But I prefer to give people a chance to post before jumping on them.
And as for scumreads, I've already said I find prplhz to be behaving scummy. But I am giving him a chance to explain himself. Iamperfection is another I'm carefully looking at. I don't understand how he can just propose to "random lynch" a good player day one without some kind of justification. And then go into lurk-mode.
Both people are already actively being pressured, and all I could contribute are +1 postings, which I'm not going to do.
|
On September 18 2012 08:57 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 06:32 iamperfection wrote:
I randomly suggest a lynch of Marvelosity.
Your guys thoughts? I think you're scum ##unvote
##vote: iamperfection
Care to share why?
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On September 18 2012 09:09 goodkarma wrote:@HiroPro:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 08:23 HiroPro wrote:BH - Mad MenI wanna lynch goodkarma. That first post of his is really cautious (barely pressures BH even though he calls out a perceived contradiction and then calls prplhz's play scummy but doesn't throw a vote down on it) He then proceeds to bring up a point of discussion (lynching lurkers), which he himself admits likely won't happen this game. ##Vote goodkarma Just to let you know, I very rarely vote early day one. Feel free to consider that a scumtell if you want. But I prefer to give people a chance to post before jumping on them. And as for scumreads, I've already said I find prplhz to be behaving scummy. But I am giving him a chance to explain himself. Iamperfection is another I'm carefully looking at. I don't understand how he can just propose to "random lynch" a good player day one without some kind of justification. And then go into lurk-mode. Both people are already actively being pressured, and all I could contribute are +1 postings, which I'm not going to do.
You actually literally just did that.
On September 18 2012 09:11 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 08:57 Blazinghand wrote:On September 18 2012 06:32 iamperfection wrote:
I randomly suggest a lynch of Marvelosity.
Your guys thoughts? I think you're scum ##unvote
##vote: iamperfection Care to share why?
This post I am making right now contains your entire contribution to the thread. Speak up, sonny, I can't hear you so good.
|
And prplhz has recently made a post that shows he is actually interested in scumhunting. It doesn't mean he's town, but given the case against him was largely based on meta, and his recent behavior (at least in my opinion) has been pro-town, I don't feel he's a good lynch candidate right now. This is why I give people a chance to discuss their viewpoints early, as otherwise I'd be vote swapping like a ridiculous amount through the first day and I don't feel this really helps at all.
|
On September 18 2012 09:11 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 08:57 Blazinghand wrote:On September 18 2012 06:32 iamperfection wrote:
I randomly suggest a lynch of Marvelosity.
Your guys thoughts? I think you're scum ##unvote
##vote: iamperfection Care to share why?
I think it's a lot more important that you tell us why you're town.
You are playing like shit right now. Explain why or stop playing like shit (there is a third option but you won't like that).
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Seriously though if you don't have anything to share about the case on prplhz, or the subsequent cases, at this point, I don't know what to say I know exactly what to say: "die scum"
So yeah get in the thread and play the fiddlesticking game, you signed up for it didn't you
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
^--- that post is directed at iamp
|
On September 18 2012 08:27 Hapahauli wrote:
##Unvote
@ Austinmcc - Well posted and thanks for explaining your rationale. Enough for me to take the vote off for now. BH you're high-fiving Hapa. You okay with the speed at which he swapped off me?
marv, I'd like your thoughts here as well. Do you feel the same way hapa does about my explanation?
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On September 18 2012 09:26 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 08:27 Hapahauli wrote:
##Unvote
@ Austinmcc - Well posted and thanks for explaining your rationale. Enough for me to take the vote off for now. BH you're high-fiving Hapa. You okay with the speed at which he swapped off me? marv, I'd like your thoughts here as well. Do you feel the same way hapa does about my explanation?
You and Hapa are secondary concerns for me. You'd get a high-5 from me, too, if you weren't AFK all the time.
Iamperfection seems perfectly happy contributing literally nothing and I will not stand for it. I will would not, could not, in the rain, or in the dark, or on a train, or in a car or a tree. I won't stand for it austinmcc. Not in the town, not in the thread, not in the world and not in my head. He won't be quiet without getting my vote, so it shall be done as it's what I wrote.
|
you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you.
The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1.
Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game.
On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL?
I say we respect his wishes.
## Vote Marvelosity
|
On September 18 2012 09:26 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 08:27 Hapahauli wrote:
##Unvote
@ Austinmcc - Well posted and thanks for explaining your rationale. Enough for me to take the vote off for now. BH you're high-fiving Hapa. You okay with the speed at which he swapped off me? marv, I'd like your thoughts here as well. Do you feel the same way hapa does about my explanation?
My D1 voting spreads like an STD.
In all seriousness, your explanation was good - everyone was on you for a bit because you weren't clear about your rationale. Explaining rationale ----> vote removed.
As for marv, I believe he's putting the finishing touches on the newbie game he's hosting, so he probably won't be around for a bit.
|
On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game. Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity
Geebus why are you flipping out?
|
On September 18 2012 09:35 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game. On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity Geebus why are you flipping out?
what?
|
On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game.Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity
Well, that means it isn't random because it was pre-meditated and thought out. Sooo, yeah.
|
On September 18 2012 09:36 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game.On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity Well, that means it isn't random because it was pre-meditated and thought out. Sooo, yeah.
Believe it or not it did randomly come out as marv.
|
On September 18 2012 09:35 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 09:35 Hapahauli wrote:On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game. On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity Geebus why are you flipping out? what?
"you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on."
Seems very unnecessarily critical/harsh/attacking. Like I don't think his case is good either, but that's just over the top and scummy imo.
|
On September 18 2012 09:32 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 09:26 austinmcc wrote:On September 18 2012 08:27 Hapahauli wrote:
##Unvote
@ Austinmcc - Well posted and thanks for explaining your rationale. Enough for me to take the vote off for now. BH you're high-fiving Hapa. You okay with the speed at which he swapped off me? marv, I'd like your thoughts here as well. Do you feel the same way hapa does about my explanation? My D1 voting spreads like an STD. In all seriousness, your explanation was good - everyone was on you for a bit because you weren't clear about your rationale. Explaining rationale ----> vote removed. As for marv, I believe he's putting the finishing touches on the newbie game he's hosting, so he probably won't be around for a bit. I got no problem with everyone being on me, that phase actually happens in a decent number of my games.
But I have no ability to judge the clarity of my explanation. I need other thoughts on how clear you seemed to find it. It also helps me see the thought processes behind their own reads, except BH. When you question him, he appears to become Drazerk.
|
On September 18 2012 09:37 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 09:36 Mementoss wrote:On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game.On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity Well, that means it isn't random because it was pre-meditated and thought out. Sooo, yeah. Believe it or not it did randomly come out as marv.
oh I thought your meant you told marv you would be voting for him specifically in the next game.
|
On September 18 2012 09:37 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 09:36 Mementoss wrote:On September 18 2012 09:30 iamperfection wrote:you case on prplhz is shit. a fucking meta case on 1 post come on. Although i dont think that was the point of your case i think the purpose was to drive discussion which it has done. Kudos to you. The purpose of my random lynch was an attempt to drive some discussion. I had already discussed with marv after my previous game in which palmar suggested a random lynch in order to drive discussion on day 1. Thats why i find it extremely wierd that marv didnt think it was random when i had already spoken with him that i would do it in my next game.On September 18 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
P.S the whole point is that iamp's suggestion wasn't random, so we already have a liar. LAL? I say we respect his wishes. ## Vote Marvelosity Well, that means it isn't random because it was pre-meditated and thought out. Sooo, yeah. Believe it or not it did randomly come out as marv.
So what are we actually supposed to gain from this random voting? o.O
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
