|
On September 23 2012 23:15 JacobStrangelove wrote:That will really move the thread forward won't it...
yeah it will if you listen to it.
thrawn so you are convinced by Jacob's walls of text huh? well I'm not.
out of no where he starts posting these long posts. I think it is a defense mechanism.
also look at his method. It seems like he decides who he is going to he suspicious of then just goes through their filter post by post grappling onto anything that he thinks could be seen as scummy. that's not a good way to make cases and that's not how he made them last game.
|
btw my case against thrawn is coming tomorrow. I can't do it justice on a cell phone
|
why would someone from lurking "instantly pop up and hammer him." He already has a majority of votes.
I'm still not understanding how your actions magically prove your innocence.
what is L-1? Isn't he already that?
|
... I think someone logged into the wrong account/ thread to post that last message. Btw guys - have been reading these huge walls of text.. Not sure what I think yet about them.
|
it sounds like gyro is talking about d1 sharrant lol.
|
Gyro if you wanna play mafia, this is not how you do it
THIS Newbie game currently takes signups, just /in there.
|
gyro give your top scum reads.
|
On September 23 2012 23:08 kushm4sta wrote:
so I just read killing's filter for the first time in like 2 days. I thoght that there were specifically 2 things kilLing did that made him look really town. Now I can only find one.
He initiates the plan to check the mason chat.
this doesn't guarantee him town.
but I read his filter and honestly it just does not seem that suspicious to me.
granted he has been quite afk. I would say its a town leaning null read atm.
Only 1 thing that makes him look town, but it doesn't guarantee him town, he doesn't seem that suspicious and is a town leaning null read?
Can you look at it again and post a read that is more logical and explained? I don't see how you can read his filter, find less things that make him look town that you originally thought did, decide that the one thing you found doesn't guarantee him town, and then come to the conclusion that he's a town/null read.
|
Hey guys one request really quick.
Can we please make subsections in long ass posts? Jacob you have good points but it gets hard to follow when your thoughts aren't in blocks
@Jacob
So based on your cases, you have a small associative dandel/killing/kush case? It did strike me quite odd when kush flat out denied the cases against remedy and dandel...
|
Something that jumped out at me after the lynch...
@Atreides
On September 23 2012 09:06 Atreides- wrote:
err 6 town and 3 mafia
Atreides, how do you know how many mafia there are???
Is there a possibility of more or less than 3 mafia?
Also, I am over halfway through thrawns filter so far...damn you thrawn for making it take forever to go through!!!
|
Sharrant are you around? You are seen as practically confirmed town mason so you should be sharing reads since your reads are most trustworthy.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On September 24 2012 02:45 debears wrote:
Is there a possibility of more or less than 3 mafia?
Yes
|
On September 21 2012 18:50 KillingTime wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2012 18:11 rethos wrote:
Actually no.. I am sorry to all of you. But it really seems that playing mafia is really not for me. I got bored and did not want to post any more. Now I am trying to catch up and can't get bring myself to it. Yes I lied about having this weird plan of lurking intentionally. I lurked because I did not have motivation to do anything.
Again I am really really sorry. I will ask for a replacement. If lynch lurkers is a decent policy - then Lynching liars, (even bad ones) is an essential policy ( from what I have read). I am sort of null on you because I don't see how your posts today help mafia or town at all but I can come up with plausible scenarios why both would do this - just totally barf worthy. I am not great at his game yet, but I am going to be annoyed if this is another game where d1 &2 are dominated by terrible town play. I am still going to look later and see if I can find a better scum - but for now. Vote##: rethos
@killing why would you want to policy lynch someone who wad getting replaced?
I feel like you agree that rethos wasnt scum but you are willing to Lynch him anyway.
|
On September 24 2012 03:15 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 24 2012 02:45 debears wrote:
Is there a possibility of more or less than 3 mafia?
Yes
what the fuck.... I also didn't realize this
|
If I have to pick between kush and killing because of the "kush is soft defending killing argument'" I think killing is the best lynch. Now kush has been on my radar the same way he was in our last game. First it's very hard to get a strong read on him if you're judging off of his reads, they are often pretty wild. Early on in the game I decided to consider him null read because of those things but there have been several points afterwards where I've thought he was town. Combine that with me not understanding why a scumkush would justify crusading so hard to switch the lynch from green remedy to green stutters... Town-kush is what I think. Killing on the other hand has somehow managed to avoid the spotlight forever. I and everyone else was suspicious of him D1 but since then I can't remember him being talked about in-depth till just recently. Look at his vote for rethos. (just saw kush pointed it out) Looks like his vote isn't based on much reasoning other than a lynch-liars policy. I don't see any reason he votes him other than that, he even says his read on the situation is a null read. Null-read on someone you're voting for is a big gamble.
|
Kush - I wanted to lynch him because he had just acted in a way that was unquestionably very anti-town and which was plausibly like a scum diversion or a scum who wanted to quit and cause chaos - I didn't know whether he would get a successful replacement or when there would be a replacement or anything at that point - it was a reaction to what was in the thread. My slight hesitancy was that I couldn't see how his actions helped scum at all except distracting us from other lynches. In the end Dandel seemed to have been playing much better than rethos - but the double green flip has obviously made me very suspicious of Dandel again too.
|
|
|
Quickly:
I suspect atleast one of kush/you/jacob are scum. I don't know which - I haven't had time to read the huge posts made post lynch yet or really give these longer filters justice.
Atreidies - scum by elimination at the moment - but that might change if I read thrawn's filter and the other cases against him and agree with them.
Dandel - given the double town lurker death, and who he has been pushing - scum. My preferred lynch atm until I get better reads on the active posters.
Debears - probable town, I dislike his d1 posts but since then I don't see mafia motivation in his posts.
Sharrant & Sharky - Town, if they are very clever lying mafia we have lost already.
|
On September 23 2012 23:18 Dandel Ion wrote:I was saying Killing has a "higher chance", meaning I have less of a town read on him than I have on Kush. It's a direct comparison.
I don't currently think Killing is too scummy, but I aknowledge the possibility that he might be. He's pretty null to me though.
I don't think Kush is scum. In other words, I think Kush is town.
Now that your past reads except for debears are gone, what are your current scum reads? I haven't seen you give any since the lynch. You discuss the possibility that killing might be scummier than kush but your read on him is null.
|
Killing those reads are very non committal, which of those do you feel most strongly about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
