|
Since someone recently accused me of not scumhunting (because I asked them why they were doing something that's generally at best null, if not anti-town, no less) I decided to filter dive a bit.
On August 21 2012 08:44 Mattchew wrote:
Bugs and VE seem to either be lacking time (no read) or care (scum)
Still ok with lynching Draz
Speaking of not scum hunting... also, accusing someone of no reads when this is his most substantial post in the thread at the time is laughable.
On August 21 2012 08:50 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2012 08:47 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm reading AND care Mattchew, care to elaborate on why you think otherwise? cause you haven't sunk your teeth into a real candidate with reason yet, you haven't picked a fight, you also havent explained why you havent done the previously mentioned things. you usually do atleast 1 of these things as town
He wants VE to pick a fight, which is generally not good for town, and he's not sinking his teeth into anyone either.
Oh. Tunneling the piss out of Drazerk, too.
On August 21 2012 09:11 Mattchew wrote:Kita Show nested quote +Any post that you make that is less than 5 sentences long must include a (relavent) opinion of someone. k thx. Come on man
Whining about a vote on him, fits the trend of non-content posting.
On August 22 2012 00:34 Mattchew wrote:
VE what do you think of bugs and allinson
Starting to see a trend. Minimal content, wanting to sheep people. Usually scummy to want someone else to lead on cases.
On August 22 2012 01:13 Mattchew wrote:
##vote dirkzor
I like this wagon
This doesn't need much talking about.
On August 22 2012 12:26 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2012 11:49 VisceraEyes wrote:
I guess no one is still considering seriously Wiggles scum right? Cause...I think he scum. *snap snap snap*
Further thoughts pending reread. i agree
On August 23 2012 01:09 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2012 21:36 Mementoss wrote:
The only reason I don't think Mattchew is scum is because he didn't reveal his scum team yet. try and get me lynched. SnB what do you think of me?
More wanting to sheep and hide behind other players.
On August 23 2012 01:33 Mattchew wrote:
i still think dirk is scum yes.
Also, i was enhancing my read of VE, which I find/found to be important in this game
also, you are town, good job
Very early assertion of "definite town" on someone, which in this case would require information townies don't have. He claims it's based on other play, but I'd need confirmation of that from someone who knows it.
On August 23 2012 02:38 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 01:56 JingleHell wrote:
SnB's alignment. Treating anyone's alignment as definite based off of the minimal info we have is ridiculous for a townie. also, you act like things can't change my reads. Does anyone else think this post is hella scummy, and a cop out for not scum hunting?
Weak OMGUS finger-point at me that doesn't even make sense under the circumstances considering my "cop out" was to ask him why he did something that's generally scummy.
|
On August 23 2012 03:06 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 02:59 strongandbig wrote:On August 23 2012 02:29 Drazerk wrote:On August 23 2012 02:20 strongandbig wrote:On August 23 2012 01:58 HiroPro wrote:On August 22 2012 20:56 Toadesstern wrote:
The creator of a role is not allowed to talk about it until the role has flipped according to a mod-statement. Are you trying to get someone mod-killed?
Why is it a role scum likely has? There has been a lot of talk about Meowth so far. Just picture him being some crazy shit like dayvig + bulletproof. Noone in their right mind would claim something like that because it would help mafia.
Besides: I shot our lovely hosts a PM and I'm totally not going to talk about what a host told me or publish a host-pm but I guess asking the right question might shed some light on some things like:
a) Meowth
b) VE
That being said. I like both VE and Meowth right now, which may sound quite strange but I doubt any of those two is actually mafia although one shot the other. It's not the fact that Meowth didn't claim their role - it's the fact that they didn't claim the shot. It shows that they likely don't want to take responsibility for it. Even the role you suggested would have no problem announcing that they fired a shot. Its not like that would force them to claim their full role. Now if they thought like Drazerk did, then maybe I could see why they wouldn't claim shooting. drazerk's thing doesn't hit you if you claim the role you received, it hits you if you claim the role you created. Yes it does sorry if that wasn't clear so wait the hosts let you make a role that instantly de-role-ify anyone who roleclaims? I... don't think that's true. Could be something like AC. Remember that game had Batman, Catwoman the Joker and whoever was the 4th guy. Batman had to kill the Joker, Catwoman had to kill the other guy, maybe there's 3rd parties who have to kill certain pokemon rather than having the usual wincons. Maybe we've got something like we had in holyroman with Igrok. He was 3rd party and had to kill everyone who had additional voting-power. Anyone claiming anything without a second of a thought should be considered mafia and so should people asking for claims right now. We don't know what's out there unnless of course you have more insight on that matter Jinglehell?
Why would I have more insight on roles, Toad? I assume that's what you meant under the circumstances?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 23 2012 03:07 strongandbig wrote:
So could they have vanilla-lasered zephirdd when he claimed his role? What if someone fakeclaims? What if they claim part of their role and not a different part?
If they get it wrong it fizzles
If they try to multi target and even one is wrong - it fizzles
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Oh and did I mention they have to publicly do this?
They are going to wait until they have at least 4-5 victims
|
On August 23 2012 03:16 Drazerk wrote:
Oh and did I mention they have to publicly do this?
They are going to wait until they have at least 4-5 victims
So basically this has to be a scum role and to use it, scum has to publicly out themselves, and have a chance of it being wrong and none of it working, and then they just get killed for it?... Sounds so fake.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 23 2012 03:17 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 03:16 Drazerk wrote:
Oh and did I mention they have to publicly do this?
They are going to wait until they have at least 4-5 victims So basically this has to be a scum role and to use it, scum has to publicly out themselves, and have a chance of it being wrong and none of it working, and then they just get killed for it?... Sounds so fake.
Well no because its infinite use so even if they get it wrong the first time they can just post again within the next second
|
On August 23 2012 03:20 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 03:17 Mementoss wrote:On August 23 2012 03:16 Drazerk wrote:
Oh and did I mention they have to publicly do this?
They are going to wait until they have at least 4-5 victims So basically this has to be a scum role and to use it, scum has to publicly out themselves, and have a chance of it being wrong and none of it working, and then they just get killed for it?... Sounds so fake. Well no because its infinite use so even if they get it wrong the first time they can just post again within the next second
So you could just spam the thread and guess every 151 pokemon for 1 person and then make them a VT no matter what. For sacrificing your life...
|
lol jingle lets see how much traction that thing gets
|
EBWOP: That doesn't make sense what I just said lol. I don't really understand the role. Sounds fake still though but we will see.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 23 2012 03:21 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 03:20 Drazerk wrote:On August 23 2012 03:17 Mementoss wrote:On August 23 2012 03:16 Drazerk wrote:
Oh and did I mention they have to publicly do this?
They are going to wait until they have at least 4-5 victims So basically this has to be a scum role and to use it, scum has to publicly out themselves, and have a chance of it being wrong and none of it working, and then they just get killed for it?... Sounds so fake. Well no because its infinite use so even if they get it wrong the first time they can just post again within the next second So you could just spam the thread and guess every 151 pokemon for 1 person and then make them a VT no matter what. For sacrificing your life...
Theres a catch with spamming it - Trust me with this one.
|
Meowth is scum role and hiding. Please lynch or ptherwise destroy Meowth in my name when I'm gone.
|
On August 23 2012 03:26 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 03:21 Mementoss wrote:On August 23 2012 03:20 Drazerk wrote:On August 23 2012 03:17 Mementoss wrote:On August 23 2012 03:16 Drazerk wrote:
Oh and did I mention they have to publicly do this?
They are going to wait until they have at least 4-5 victims So basically this has to be a scum role and to use it, scum has to publicly out themselves, and have a chance of it being wrong and none of it working, and then they just get killed for it?... Sounds so fake. Well no because its infinite use so even if they get it wrong the first time they can just post again within the next second So you could just spam the thread and guess every 151 pokemon for 1 person and then make them a VT no matter what. For sacrificing your life... Theres a catch with spamming it - Trust me with this one.
Lets try this out. I am Butterfly and I can roleblock people and remove their resistances in one action. Your move.
|
|
|
Yeah he didn't claim the name. Awkwarrrrd...
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Probably unwise to use the role I actually made Kurumi
|
On August 23 2012 04:11 Kenpachi wrote:
Butterfly
Kenpachi your filter is great man
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On August 23 2012 04:20 strongandbig wrote:Kenpachi your filter is great man
Better than most of his games
|
On August 23 2012 04:14 Drazerk wrote:
Probably unwise to use the role I actually made Kurumi
Ah yes Butterfree. You are not my master so deal with it. Also this role sucks and you should feel bad. Just look at that damn Diglett , it is better.
Okay , I am better now.
|
On August 23 2012 04:25 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 04:14 Drazerk wrote:
Probably unwise to use the role I actually made Kurumi Ah yes Butterfree. You are not my master so deal with it. Also this role sucks and you should feel bad. Just look at that damn Diglett , it is better. Okay , I am better now.
Other than make yourself very vulnerable what was the purpose of claiming
|
On August 23 2012 04:44 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 04:25 Kurumi wrote:On August 23 2012 04:14 Drazerk wrote:
Probably unwise to use the role I actually made Kurumi Ah yes Butterfree. You are not my master so deal with it. Also this role sucks and you should feel bad. Just look at that damn Diglett , it is better. Okay , I am better now. Other than make yourself very vulnerable what was the purpose of claiming
Pff , I dont give a damn. I am close to Oracle once again, dying sounds cool. I am an useless role for town.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
