EPTAge of Empires: The Age of Kings Mini Mafia - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:34 EchelonTee wrote: My opinion is that if Blazinghand wasn't in a power alliance, I would be disappointed. So would I. My highest win chance is in a large alliance. Everyone's trying for a powerful alliance, I assume, and anyone who thinks or tells you otherwise is yanking your chain. | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:34 EchelonTee wrote: My opinion is that if Blazinghand wasn't in a power alliance, I would be disappointed. And if he is in a poweralliance you wouldn't be interested in having him lynched to weaken that alliance? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:36 Tunkeg wrote: And if he is in a poweralliance you wouldn't be interested in having him lynched to weaken that alliance? If anyone is in a power alliance I'm not in, I'm interested in lynching them. It doesn't matter who they are. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
| ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:34 Blazinghand wrote: But... we're literally not in the phase where you can make alliances. Are you even playing this game? Did you read the rules? You're doing a good job of trying to convince me you're not in charge of a big group, but the newb card can only be played so much before it looks suspicious. But that is not what I am trying to discuss. I am trying to discuss who is more likely to get a strong good group going. Everyone wants to be in a strong alliance, but not all are able to achieve it. You get a good strong group by reputation, more people want to team up with someone with a good reputation. I could mention opthers who are highly regarded here as well who is very likely to getinto a poweralliance. And fyi I am not playing the newb card, I am not a newb, I am playing the no one in this game likes me card... | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:39 Blazinghand wrote: If anyone is in a power alliance I'm not in, I'm interested in lynching them. It doesn't matter who they are. But I am asking ET if he is willing to lynch you, and he obv should unless he is in the process of talking to you. So please answer ET. You have yourself said that you expect BH to be in a poweralliance... | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
Just for fun.  | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:45 MrZentor wrote: Idea: when Bugs reveals the order in which people got to pick their civilizations, we should lynch the person who got to pick first. Just for fun. Great derail, are you in bed with ET and BH son? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
This whole idea of "reputations" is BS. You get a strong group by demonstrating your value. I've played AoE before, and I have an idea of what units are good. I posted that in the thread, hoping to attract PMs and hoping that whoever I PMed would think me valuable and not double-cross me. Now, why would you play the "nobody likes me" card? Because you clearly want to APPEAR that you're in a weak group. Maybe that's because you are, in fact, going to be in a weak group. Maybe nobody PMed you, and the guy you PMed told you to screw off. But I don't think that's the case. I think you've been active in the thread and naturally attracted PMs. What I'm interested in seeing is what happens once the alliance phase begins and people have actual teams, because that's when the real game starts. Maybe then I'll be in a strong alliance, or maybe I'll be in a weak one, or even alone if I'm screwed over. I'd like to think I can make some sort of case that I'm in a weak alliance, but saying "wahh nobody likes me" is not a case for you being in a weak alliance. There aren't even alliances yet. In any case, I don't see any reason to talk with you any more. If you think MrZ, ET, and I are all out to get you, that's fine. I think you're just trying to look bad so you don't get lynched. | ||
|
Atki Wiglegs
Kiribati11 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:46 Tunkeg wrote: Great derail, are you in bed with ET and BH son? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/DFNyN.png) The World's Most Treacherous Orgy I like this fighting that's going on right now between yourself and others Tunkeg, especially when it's coming at a time when there's not really anything to fight about, or anything to really even talk about. Are you trying to create distance between yourself and others because you're planning on entering an alliance with them? That's what it's looking like to me right now. You're trying to disguise associations and break apparent relationships, but you're doing it at the wrong time, so it only highlights them more. I'm watching you. | ||
|
Sir Posts A Lot
Congo42 Posts
| ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:47 Blazinghand wrote: Whether or not people like each other is irrelevant, though. I dislike literally everyone. You've played with me. This whole idea of "reputations" is BS. You get a strong group by demonstrating your value. I've played AoE before, and I have an idea of what units are good. I posted that in the thread, hoping to attract PMs and hoping that whoever I PMed would think me valuable and not double-cross me. Now, why would you play the "nobody likes me" card? Because you clearly want to APPEAR that you're in a weak group. Maybe that's because you are, in fact, going to be in a weak group. Maybe nobody PMed you, and the guy you PMed told you to screw off. But I don't think that's the case. I think you've been active in the thread and naturally attracted PMs. What I'm interested in seeing is what happens once the alliance phase begins and people have actual teams, because that's when the real game starts. Maybe then I'll be in a strong alliance, or maybe I'll be in a weak one, or even alone if I'm screwed over. I'd like to think I can make some sort of case that I'm in a weak alliance, but saying "wahh nobody likes me" is not a case for you being in a weak alliance. There aren't even alliances yet. In any case, I don't see any reason to talk with you any more. If you think MrZ, ET, and I are all out to get you, that's fine. I think you're just trying to look bad so you don't get lynched. It isn't. I think everyone have in some way made up their mind about who they think is good players and who is not in this game. I have at least. Also there are players who have been harder in eachother throats then others. I can name alot of players here that I have been in heated discussions with who basicly have said they would prefer never to play with me again. I think the players who are most respected in here is more likely to be getting into good alliances period, thats what I am saying. I don't think you, ET and MrZ are out to get me, I think you are in the business of not wanting this discussed. It is a very reasonable thing to discuss IMO. You are ofc free to not wanting to discuss this, you have at least put in some posts about this, even though they are dodgy, dismissive and condecending, nothing out of the ordinary from you... | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
| ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 06:04 Atki Wiglegs wrote: The World's Most Treacherous Orgy I like this fighting that's going on right now between yourself and others Tunkeg, especially when it's coming at a time when there's not really anything to fight about, or anything to really even talk about. Are you trying to create distance between yourself and others because you're planning on entering an alliance with them? That's what it's looking like to me right now. You're trying to disguise associations and break apparent relationships, but you're doing it at the wrong time, so it only highlights them more. I'm watching you. Damn you got me...  But really, what do you think about my theory regarding the "stronger" players increased chance of getting a good alliance together? What would stop the best players in here to form up a strong alliance and just roflstomp the entire game? Why not discuss that as well. I am fine with you watching me, as long as you listen to what I say. | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 06:07 Sir Posts A Lot wrote: lol this is fun Why is it fun. You think I am being a clown with what I write? Is it fun because I am completly wrong? Or is it fun because I am right and those others are just dodging and instead of discussing the topic just are trying to ridicule me? What do you think ont he subject? GO! | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
| ||
|
Sir Posts A Lot
Congo42 Posts
On August 13 2012 06:16 Tunkeg wrote: Why is it fun. You think I am being a clown with what I write? Is it fun because I am completly wrong? Or is it fun because I am right and those others are just dodging and instead of discussing the topic just are trying to ridicule me? What do you think ont he subject? GO! It's fun because you guys are so serious yet no alliances have been made and nothing has happened yet. Hell the map and civilizations haven't been chosen either. It's good drama though If you have a plan that hinges on posting lots of stuff in the thread then it's fine I guess. I don't have plans on posting at this Pre-Alliance phase though. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On August 13 2012 06:19 Tunkeg wrote: Also all of you who haven't posted at all, what the fuck is up with that? I know you are just bowing down to your überlords and accepting their notion that there is nothing to discuss at the moment. This while they sit around laughing at how easy they are getting away with their plots and schemes. Get into the thread and start playing, don't just sit around and let yourself be outplayed! People who haven't posted could easily be outplaying you or me or ET... there are PMs you now. | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On August 13 2012 06:25 Sir Posts A Lot wrote: It's fun because you guys are so serious yet no alliances have been made and nothing has happened yet. Hell the map and civilizations haven't been chosen either. It's good drama though If you have a plan that hinges on posting lots of stuff in the thread then it's fine I guess. I don't have plans on posting at this Pre-Alliance phase though. But there are obviously people talking in PM's, and regardless of whether or not the alliances have been made and agreed upon allready there are observations that can be made about the game in general. It is possible to start trying to figure players out in this game, we don't have to wait for alliances to be made before we start discussing. Alliances are as fragile after they are made as before, they can be broken at any time. | ||
| ||
