"what lol" FoS tube No. Hapa made a completely reasonable observation regarding your posting habits (of producing worthless spam) and you A) respond to it and B) blow it off like its nothing. Accusations and suspicions don't just disappear because you ignore them or dismiss them with no further explanation than NOPE! Any time your ready, you can chime in on any of the ongoing discussions. Doing that would prove the accusations wrong, as opposed to just arguing that they're wrong. You know what I thought of when making this post:
In other news, Fulla's filter makes me nervous. + Show Spoiler +
Just under 4 hours until a full day from his welcome post. Wtf? Perhaps busy or something, but ffs, that looks fishy. FoS Fulla
On July 17 2012 04:30 tube wrote: what lol maybe i just dont see anything to analyze in day 1 with no information
You're not giving us anything to talk about by saying there's nothing to talk about. You're now at ~6 posts from the beginning of the game and have made zero actual effort in any of those posts at participating in the discussion. Textbook active lurker. Everyone will question your motives for that so you might want to make some small effort here or the town will withhold your prune juice.
yes i am 3 people just talked about how somehow my not believing in analysis day 1 is a tell since you guys apparently think thats something to talk about
half of the people in the game have already been accused and i literally dont agree with any of the arguments that were made yet because they're all too speculative yeah those are my thoughts i guess im mafia
On July 17 2012 04:30 tube wrote: what lol maybe i just dont see anything to analyze in day 1 with no information
You're not giving us anything to talk about by saying there's nothing to talk about. You're now at ~6 posts from the beginning of the game and have made zero actual effort in any of those posts at participating in the discussion. Textbook active lurker. Everyone will question your motives for that so you might want to make some small effort here or the town will withhold your prune juice.
yes i am 3 people just talked about how somehow my not believing in analysis day 1 is a tell since you guys apparently think thats something to talk about
if you think theres a motive to question do tell
If there's no discussion day 1, if there's a mislynch, there's almost no information to work with day 2, at which point I suppose you still want us to avoid analysis on limited information? This game is all about finding a way to work despite the information disadvantage, and find the scum.
Active non-contribution is a fairly valid reason for a D1 lynch, in absence of scumtells.
On July 17 2012 05:04 tube wrote: half of the people in the game have already been accused and i literally dont agree with any of the arguments that were made yet because they're all too speculative yeah those are my thoughts i guess im mafia
If you don't like the accusations, make your own, or better yet, go watch Elmo. What did you expect to happen in a game that's all about persuasion, scamming, and perception?
On July 17 2012 04:30 tube wrote: what lol maybe i just dont see anything to analyze in day 1 with no information
You're not giving us anything to talk about by saying there's nothing to talk about. You're now at ~6 posts from the beginning of the game and have made zero actual effort in any of those posts at participating in the discussion. Textbook active lurker. Everyone will question your motives for that so you might want to make some small effort here or the town will withhold your prune juice.
yes i am 3 people just talked about how somehow my not believing in analysis day 1 is a tell since you guys apparently think thats something to talk about
if you think theres a motive to question do tell
If there's no discussion day 1, if there's a mislynch, there's almost no information to work with day 2, at which point I suppose you still want us to avoid analysis on limited information? This game is all about finding a way to work despite the information disadvantage, and find the scum.
Active non-contribution is a fairly valid reason for a D1 lynch, in absence of scumtells.
why do you suppose that and how is active non-contribution a better reason than overall inactivity i just dont feel like not posting anything
On July 17 2012 05:04 tube wrote: half of the people in the game have already been accused and i literally dont agree with any of the arguments that were made yet because they're all too speculative yeah those are my thoughts i guess im mafia
Again - why are you dismissing all forms of analysis so easily? You also refuse to take a stand against anyone so far despite posting many one-liners and substanceless posts to make you seem active.
Until and unless we get a clear scumread, let's get rid of the guy who's actively not contributing by telling us we're doing it wrong and not doing anything else, like posting a read or starting a useful discussion.
On July 17 2012 05:08 tube wrote: jesus what is with all this hostility
We aren't being hostile. We're playing the game. You're basically telling us that until and unless the scum team decides to tell us who they are we should shut up and sit down, because you don't like our speculation.
Without, might I add, elucidation on what's wrong with the arguments being presented.
On July 17 2012 05:04 tube wrote: half of the people in the game have already been accused and i literally dont agree with any of the arguments that were made yet because they're all too speculative yeah those are my thoughts i guess im mafia
So... another one? Okay. I thought it was pretty obvious what you needed to do now, but I will help you out. You got FOS'd so you would talk, and with more than a sentence or two.
Consider each argument already present and weigh in on it. You have said you disagree with them already. That's all fine and dandy but it doesn't help anyone to just say "Nope, I disagree." Nor does martyring yourself and resigning yourself to a lynching if you are indeed town.
So create an argument, any at all, with a strategy in mind, and address the following: For any present arguments you wish to address: *Why do you disagree? *Is someone a better candidate?
Or you could go ahead and stir up a new side conversation yourself. We don't want to have to be suspicious of you in particular, especially if you are on our side. We just don't have much choice at the moment.
On July 17 2012 05:22 tube wrote: i didnt martyr myself i thought making a sarcastic statement like that would make people realize how pointless it is to lynch me
You might be able to expect that to work if you've actually made an effort in the thread. I can't argue with the mindset, I've taken it myself. But if you haven't actually TRIED to be productive, and you have half the town on you, you need to start presenting a defense.
On July 17 2012 05:22 tube wrote: i didnt martyr myself i thought making a sarcastic statement like that would make people realize how pointless it is to lynch me
Sooo... you thought making sarcastic one-liners would shift suspicion off you? If you want to avoid suspicion, take the points against you seriously and start posting with substance.
the points against me are that im being an active lurker and thats supposedly our best lynch how am i supposed to respond to that other than "i just felt like posting" because i didnt want to be inactive
from my point of view im not attracting suspicion to begin with
and yeah in every accusation against other people so far you can tell that people are just trying to make something out of nothing which is why i dont agree with anyone yet
also there should be pressure on the people who haven't even posted yet to say something: drwiggl3s fulla mufaa evulrabbitz
thats 4 people any of which could be mafia just sitting there watching you guys gang up on the "active lurker"
On July 17 2012 05:39 tube wrote: the points against me are that im being an active lurker and thats supposedly our best lynch how am i supposed to respond to that other than "i just felt like posting" because i didnt want to be inactive
from my point of view im not attracting suspicion to begin with
WAT. Holy scumslip.
Posting for no reason other than to appear active? That smells like a mafia trying to put up a facade of townieness without providing any info.
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/jmnsf.jpg)
