Bureaucracy Mafia! - Page 8

On July 25 2012 09:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Twice in two pages Mattchew. Considering the amount you're posting, that's an eternity.

On July 25 2012 09:57 VisceraEyes wrote:


What part of "completely gut" did you misunderstand sir? If you're innocent then just trust that you're not on my red list for a reason.

On July 25 2012 10:09 VisceraEyes wrote:


At the risk of sounding like a douche....that's really scummy of you sir.

On July 25 2012 13:01 Probulous wrote:
Fuck it

## lynch layabout

Do you want reasons or are you just happy to let me take the responsibility for his flip?

On July 25 2012 14:13 supersoft wrote:
okay I read layabout now. And I honestly wouldn't have killed him. I fail to see why he's scummier than sloosh or MZ.
I admit, that my first stage, second stage and thirdstage post was a mistake. I just wanted to give you a rough image...
No let's hope the best.
He'll flip soon right?

On July 25 2012 14:47 Probulous wrote:
Hmm interesting.

A dud nuke for scum, maybe there might be a scum nuke out there after all. But why haven't scum used it yet?

On July 25 2012 15:25 Probulous wrote:


This is downright stupid.

Think about it, we have two confirmed mirror roles. What does a third do? If you think Chez is scum because of his actions, then post a case, but lynching him because we want to test the mirror role thing is scummy as all hell. It has been "tested" and twice it has been found to be true. So if you accept that it is true that every role has a mirror than you can push Chez based on your belief but not to "test" it.

On July 25 2012 15:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

This is a good point, if the mirror theory holds true then sloosh is probably the mafia nuke.

On July 25 2012 15:36 Probulous wrote:
Matt, hasn't it been tested already?

What exactly does another flip tell us that the previous ones haven't? It's a really bad reason to lynch someone.

@Meapak

Why did Zealos leave out the first line from sandroba's PM? I just don't understand how his reaction to sandroba makes him scum. Either he deliberately chose to remove that line and not respond to sandroba in thread, or he is dumb and wasn't reading.

Wait a second, maybe he expected Sandroba to die that night alleviating him of the need to post the PM? But that doesn't explain why he left out the first line. I don't get it, can someone explain to me?

On July 25 2012 15:38 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Only one of them can have actually killed foolishness.

Here's my biggest problem with the mirror theory. There are 4 scum left, 2 are execs. That only leaves 2 other possible minions with roles. The mirror theory simply doesn't hold up since we know there are more than 2 townies with PRs.

On July 25 2012 15:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
TBH I don't think the game was designed for 4 consecutive scum lynches and 2 D1 nuclear launches...but I mean, your guess is as good as mine.

On July 25 2012 15:49 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

I would have thought the minions would have been warned off of shooting foolishness given how easy it would have been for someone to shoot foolishness and get away with it had he been town. I can understand the rational behind a mafia vig shooting foolishness which is exactly why I'd expect him to have warned people against it.

The more I think about it though, it doesn't matter either way since sloosh is scum no matter which way you slice it according to the mirror theory. Unless you think supersoft could be scum but I doubt it.