EPTNot a native english speaker.. so i'm sorry if my grammar isn't good
Newbie Mini Mafia XX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
Not a native english speaker.. so i'm sorry if my grammar isn't good | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
With a random vote on day 1 the probability of hitting scum is low, but missing wont be that dangerous, the question that i want to make is: With this low ratio of scum, does the nolynch becomes more or less viable? I'm still a newbie in mafia games, thats one of the reasons of asking this questing And sorry about my bad english, i'm not a native speaker About what being happening here.. Lazer was not clear on what he said, Hopeless stated that, and yourHarry immidiatly voted Hopeless for that So, in my opinion if we want to catch the scum we have to confront them, so i Hopeless did the right thing...But so did yourHarry, what i find funny was JingleHell jumping in to declare FoS on yourHarry In my opinion Hopeless and yourHarry did almost same same thing My main suspects right now fall to yourHarry and JingleHell, because your acusations seammed more like a counter acusation after a "scum teammate" being acused But is all still too light, a lot of people still havent spoken | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
| ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:41 JingleHell wrote: Wait, so my actual reasoning is supposed to be an OMGUS, and Harry's suggestion that 23% is gambling odds is only equally suspicious as my case? When my case was based purely off of suspicious behavior, and my defense was based on the lack of substance, which was the grounds for my accusation? Not only does that not make any logical sense, it also feels like exactly what you just accused me of doing. Sorry, dont know what OMGUS is, i will search About the 23% odds, i didnt read that..... because of the time that it took me to type, i'll will make sure to check new replies before i post something that took a litle bit of time to type | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:53 YourHarry wrote: A. He thinks I am trying to mislynch. (False) B. I am not participating in case based on substantial evidence (True, but not my fault probably) Thanks for the welcome A: We cant know for sure what you are trying to do, a statment like "i'm not trying to mislynch" is worth notting... scum wont say they are trying to mislynch B: Well, there no eveindence that he wanted to start a bandwagon, there was only a acusation of lazer's contradiction, BUT you told us what you tought about it... thats your opinion, so its recorded now What i believe he condemns you most is for the "early" vote... And then you came with the odds not being bad..................... | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
And its again funny to see that Hopeless jumped on your defence... After you had already voted harry after harry voted hopeless In my mind, you and harry are the prime suspects..but only a few hours have passed, and i dont want to jump into bad conclusions | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
You may say its scummy atitude, all that i can say to defend myself is that it was a newbie atitude... On July 05 2012 22:18 BassInSpace wrote: I don't quite understand. So you think that hopeless and jingle are mafia because hopeless defended jingle, but jingle and harry are actually your prime suspects? I'd just like this point clarified. well i wasnt very clear it seems.. Lets see what happenned before that post: >Harry voted Hopeless >jingle isnta voted Harry for that vote >Harry voted Jingle >Hopeless returns and gives some suport to Jingle i believe that the part that confused you was saying that harry and jingle were the prime ones, not jingle and hopeless. Well, what i was trying to say was that harry and jingle were the ones with bigger chance to be scum due to OMGUS, of course that if jingle is revealed scum Hopeless chances of being scum increases __________________________________ It seem people want me to take a stance, fine! Reading the new posts it to me that Release is trying to force a lynch on Lazer, and i see no motive for that Release main acusation is that Lazer first post is really bad, sure, it wasnt good, he wrote so much, and almost no decent content... But your main acusation is that Lazer's first post if it had really started a discussion on the subject as he intended to do we would loose tremendous amount of time discussing meangless stuff, and I ask you, how could we loose that much time discussing why VT shouldnt fake claim? Its a little obious what lazer said, so it wouldnt wast us as much time as you want us to believe If you actually think the discussion about sex toys is designed to shit up the thread, i don't know what to say. It's maybe a page long, it shut down your attempt (in an awkward fashion), and he hasn't tried to rehash it once it died off I dont see the point of the sex toys discussion not being rehashed, Lazer did not tried to rehash what he pointed out in the first post, and it seems like you are saying that the sex toys discussion was positive Basically, i agree that Lazeer first post was bad, but it wasnt the work of the scum Devil that you want us to believe, it seems to me that you are trying really hard to see Lazer lynched at all costs when there werent another topic going on that you didnt pay atition FoS Release | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
The reason i vote hopeless is because i think he has a better chance of being scum than Lazer who was the one that had more votes before my post Hapa gets his big point on Hopeless meta... but that game game that Hapa showed Hopeless was lynched day1, that could have made him switch his gameplan But i cant vote against Lazer, he totally does not seem scum to me, the votes on him are an over reaction towards his first post I'm not voting for another person because only 30 min left to the deadline, so it seems that the only viable votes are Lazer or Hopeless | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
On July 07 2012 10:25 Hapahauli wrote: Also I will be requesting medic protection tonight if that's fine with everyone in town. Given that I created and pushed the case for [b]Hopeless1der[b] throughout Day 1, I'm probably not a popular guy with the Mafia at the moment. Fine by me! Btw: can you ellaborate on Jingle slips? or is it better to wait for the day? | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
On July 07 2012 14:38 YourHarry wrote: EDBWOP (Edits bolded): For similar reason, this also clears evulrabbitz. After TMG's vote, lazer, as expected, voted for hopeless, which tied their votes at 5 a piece. Evulrabbitz then broke the tie, voting for hopeless, 23 minutes before the deadline. At these time points which were so close to the deadline, it was clear that each of their votes would make a definite impact. Especially since there was no clear consensus on hopeless being the scum (except for hapahuli, even people who were voting for him, myself included, projected their doubt on hopeless being scum but that it was the better choice between lazer and hopeless) it would not have been that suspicious to place their lynch deciding vote on lazer, rather than hopeless. I only noticed it now, but lazer voted before me, his vote is immidiatly before mod's votecount, and the votecount doesnt included him.. When Evul voted it was 5-5 with advantage for Hopeless because he reached 5 first, Evul voting Hopeless didnt decide the lynch but secured the lynch | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
On July 07 2012 23:57 Evulrabbitz wrote: What I was trying to say with my last post; My vote did in fact secure the lynch on Hopeless, but not from the aspect you are looking at it. By voting for anyone but LazerMonkey I did in fact decide the outcome of the D1 lynch. It doesn't matter that I voted for Hopeless, since he would have been lynched anyway. What matter is that I did not vote for Lazermonkey since then there would have been more votes on Lazer than on Hopeless. but look, if you kept your vote on jingle for example, Mackin or Khorrus could "magically" apear and vote for Lazer but by voting on Hopeless, the two of them needed to vote for lazer.. and i couldn't see Khorrus returning | ||
| ||
