Prphlz is being a reckless townie.

Sinensis is being a cautious, lurky scum. (A lot like my scum play actually)

Forgot to do this earlier. ##Vote: Sinensis

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 22:54 GMT

#260

Marvel, I don't see how you think it's possible that scum could act so recklessly.

Scum are cautious and afraid to post, like Sinensis. -.-

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 23:04 GMT

#262

Nobody's reads are 100% accurate, but Sinensis is a MUCH better lynch than Prphlz.

Sure, it's possible that prphlz is mafia, but it's much more likely that Sinensis is, and we should lynch whoever has the highest probability of being mafia.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 23:09 GMT

#264

+ Show Spoiler +

I suspected three people when I was alive in Movie Star mafia, Prphlz(Mafia), Rataban(SK), and Marv.(I just wanted to kill somebody besides myself)

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 23:13 GMT

#267

Sloosh, point out some people; Sinensis has been obvious to me because it's ridiculously cautious and mechanical.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 07 2012 01:12 GMT

#326

NSH=WBG

o.0

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 07 2012 05:24 GMT

#358

Facts need speculation to be useful.

Speculation needs facts to be useful.

I haven't had time to carefully read the cases yet, but currently it seems you two are frustrated because your different scumhunting methods make it difficult for you to explain your opinions and the reasons behind them to each other. Because you don't understand the motives behind each other's actions, it's easy to see them as scummy.

I'm too tired to know if this post is ridiculously idiotic.

Tell me in the morning, will you?

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 07 2012 18:24 GMT

#395

Wow, this is the first time I've lead a lynch.

I feel so pro.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 08 2012 00:34 GMT

#436

Guys, the case on sinensis is much stronger than the one on wiggle.

Last minute lynch candidate switches are a terrible idea. >.<

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 08 2012 00:44 GMT

#438

We haven't had enough time to investigate wiggles well enough that we know he would be a good lynch.

We HAVE had plenty of time to investigate sinensis to know that he would be a great lynch.

The actual vote switching isn't the problem; the problem is that we end up with a lynch target who doesn't have a good chance of being mafia.

So, yes, we should switch back to the original target, Sinensis.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 08 2012 02:02 GMT

#450

-.-

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 08 2012 21:01 GMT

#479

Sinensis, Marv, VE

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 09 2012 02:22 GMT

#515

NOOOOOOO

R.I.P. MsZontar

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 09 2012 02:49 GMT

#523

We need to finish what we started the first day. I know one of the scum, and I'm not going to let him go.

##Vote: Sinensis

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 09 2012 14:59 GMT

#542

MrZentor - your read on Sinensis day 1 was "cautious, lurky" scum, and you've come out strong with a vote on him day 2. Yet Sinensis is no longer cautious, nor lurky. So what makes up your scumread on him?

When he realized that acting like that was going to get him lynched, he tried something new.

He's still scum.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 09 2012 15:04 GMT

#544

Because what he did initially and how he transitioned out of doing that is extremely scummy.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 09 2012 15:13 GMT

#546

Make an effort yourself.

Look through his filter, and if you can't find anything scummy, look at the cases against him.

Why do I need to convince you? A lot of the town already agrees that Sinensis is scum.