The conclusion of the lynch all (whatever you want to lynch) discussion seems to always be to adjust accordingly with the situation.

For instance, if somebody had been posting pro town the whole game but was caught lying, it wouldn't be wise to lynch said person.

Basically, there's absolutely no reason to enforce a policy lynch without first reviewing the actions of the to be lynched person.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:16 GMT

#138

Haha, MsZontar isn't a smurf.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:20 GMT

#140

She's somebody I convinced to play forum mafia, who is also extremely jealous of my name.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:24 GMT

#142

She's played plenty of mafia in real life.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:28 GMT

#144

Both of them are being rash, but I see more reason for slOosh's vote than prplhz's.

I don't really think that votes this early in the game matter.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:42 GMT

#147

To get a response from a lurker.

I want to talk to VE and NoSmurf.

What happened to VE anyways?

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:45 GMT

#150

YAYA VE!

What's the Kenpachi rule...?

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:49 GMT

#153

But how do we no NSH isn't Kenpachi?

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 12:49 GMT

#154

know*

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 13:08 GMT

#159

I agree that the claim isn't scummy, but it's terribly annoying to claim something that doesn't really affect anything.

It's a waste of time.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 13:57 GMT

#176

I want to talk to Sinesis.

On July 06 2012 14:58 Sinensis wrote:
I'll support the occasional policy lynch if there's someone I think should be banned from mafia in general and I don't want to deal with at all. There isn't anyone like that in this game though so for our purposes, I am opposed to policy lynches. Since that seems to be what we're talking about.

I am disappointed in sloosh for the random vote, would rather he at least said something about why. Maybe he'll come back later and clear it up; he would be wise to in my opinion.

His first post seems really weird...

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 14:12 GMT

#178

I never said prplhz's behavior wasn't weird; I'm just saying that Sinensis's is.

The post seems too cautious and well planned.

Scum are way more likely to be overly cautious (like Sinensis) than to be overly careless (prplhz), which is why I'm interested in talking with Sinensis.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 16:38 GMT

#192

Marv, I don't think prphlz would change his scum play so radically just because of a suggestion. Both town players and mafia players act strangely, and they both do it about as often as each other. So basically, the Prphlz case is based on something (strange play) that doesn't actually indicate his role.

Sinensis better start posting more soon.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 16:52 GMT

#195

Show me exactly where he contradicted himself in quotes.

He didn't.

Something you inferred (I feel you incorrectly inferred, but that's up for debate) from one of his posts contradicts his posting style.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

July 06 2012 17:05 GMT

#202

Zontar, I didn't say I would lynch him based on that one terrible post, in fact I never even suggested lynching him; I'm just saying that he is very suspicious and that he better get in here and start posting pro town or I will do my best to lynch him.

On July 06 2012 22:15 prplhz wrote:
not this again....................

I see it more of a reference to Marv and VE being ridiculously suspicious of each other over the smallest things.

I would like Prphlz to get in here to tell us what he meant.