EPTMovie Star Mini Mafia! - Page 44
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Recently he thinks I might be town, calls Snarfs null, then disappears again. Urgle. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
I think xsksc is leaning town. Simple stuff like how he is trying to contribute by answering stuff for the guy he was replacing (pretty silly thing to do but a dumb excuse to create content is pretty townie), he's been quite active and vocal (even already been attacked for it). | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 26 2012 21:53 prplhz wrote: I kind of agree with risk.nuke that marvellosity doesn't look scum. I have no idea about the SK thing or what the "SK profile" is. I just think that marvellosity was out of a sticky situation looking kind of alright if he was scum (the day1 tunnelfest) and then he decided to engage in it again out of the blue on day2 when it should be pretty obvious that he would end up looking horrible, makes no sense at all to me. It's really that simple. "It makes no sense at all to me." into "It's really that simple." That's not an opinion one way or the other! Yet you want to lynch Shraft, one of the people that I feel is one of the few who is actually interested in helping find scum. Like, this doesn't even make sense. So please, tell me what the fuck this shit is before I lose my shit. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
........ = town? PRPLHZ I AM DISAPPOINT! | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
The zentor lynch for one. He was the only person who thought Zentor had claimed blue. On June 23 2012 10:16 Mattchew wrote: I am going against my policy of always lynching mrzentor cause I don't think it's smart to lynch a claimed blue in a mini on day 1 especially with no counterclaim... Are we thinking that he got lucky with his guess or someone is holding their tongue? Do you think someone counterclaiming would be worth it to likely Out 1 scum? Ve Marv and prob i would like your thoughts on rasta.. He is also very quick to believe it. when he realized he made a mistake he quickly switches On June 23 2012 10:23 Mattchew wrote: Is this not for this game.. Cause If not fuck me let's lynch mrz Now think about this, for a town player they could make the same mistake, but they would be trying to root out if it was a valid claim or not. Instead he takes it at face value and thinks it is enough on its own not to lynch someone. Nothing changes from when he realizes Z is blue to actually green and yet that sole reason makes him switch his vote. Like I said, town could make the same mistake, but I don't think it would be handled the same way. Similarly we see today he posts this case: On June 26 2012 12:05 Mattchew wrote: So I have three suspects in my list for scum/sk players. Those three (in order of how I would like them lynched/killed) are Rastaban, Prplhz and marvellosity My First Suspect is Rastaban. + Show Spoiler + On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote: (big post by post case on Risk.Nuke that I am not quoting) This all feels extremely middle of the road, I am ready to jump on a bandwagon but don't want to commit to anything scum play. He also contradicts himself about the talks about Marv, then contradicts his we have 48 hours post, by posting a case that he is pretty deadset on, about risk.nuke. Overall I just feel like Rastaban's posting has been flaky and his case on Risk is bad. To answer his question to the thread, I read his vote switch that he was not confident in a Marv lynch, and that he wanted to pressure a lurker with no content. Also, his first 30ish hour case doesn't take into account that Risk.nuke has played many many games before ##Vote: rastaban He thinks marv is scummy but did not want to vote for him day 1? That's perfectly reasonable play. I find this tone (throughout the game) when in conversation with Marv to be strange. He has not ever given a reason for thinking Marv or VE is town, yet constantly lumps them together as townies arguing. All in all, I find the tone of Rastaban's posts to be hesitant and a little off. I find that his lumping of townreads on players suspicious, and he has never really responded to a single case brought up. Instead he has just safely tunneled his forced case on Risk. I want scum Rastaban dead. He barely even defends himself even though he was extremely close to being lynched which shows me he's more scum than bad town (for you prob... <3) ##vote Rastaban Next up we have Prplhz I have already posted my thoughts on his timing of his Zeph case. While I was wrong about MrZ being his scum teammate, that hasn't dropped my suspicions. He posted a case, when it had no chance of actually impacting anything. I can't see a reason a townie would do this. It is obviously not going to get the attention he should want it to receive and all it provides him with is the ability to later on say I've been making cases all game. He hasn't posted about Zeph since that day ended. I think enough time has been given to say WTF? and then he goes and posts this... Like is Risk now your #1 target too now? Where did his suspicions of Zeph go? Why isn't he trying to push his case on him that he wanted to lynch me for calling him out on the weird timing? Why can't I equate almost anything he has done with a Town Agenda? Finally we have Marv. I actually should maybe color Marv black, because I think his play just feels very off. I think I lean him being the SK more than I do him being scum. Either way he eventually needs a noose. His filter is long and fluffy. A ton of arguing with VE but even more deflecting of actual answers... instead he resorts to inane arguments full of WIFOM and fallacys, like in all these filter enhancing posts. Can someone pick me out anything pro-town from these? + Show Spoiler + On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote: I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first. On June 22 2012 07:30 marvellosity wrote: incorrect answer On June 22 2012 07:32 marvellosity wrote: lol, ok dear. If people could look for themselves, then maybe just one person in the whole of LV and the obsQT might have had a tingling suspicion, no? No. On June 22 2012 07:34 marvellosity wrote: here's a clue count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation profit On June 22 2012 08:52 marvellosity wrote: lol, ok. On June 22 2012 09:39 marvellosity wrote: VE, you're so tedious sometimes. On June 22 2012 09:50 marvellosity wrote: I've quite clearly stated I am not, stop it. The similar thing, VE, is that I wasn't afraid of saying something that was scummy in that game. In this game, unless you underestimate me which I think you do not, you should be aware that I know making a sidestep to Mattchew's question could be viewed scummily, and I'd avoid it like the fucking plague if I were scum. On June 22 2012 09:52 marvellosity wrote: Don't be an idiot. Why would I let myself in for this (fairly predictable, even if how long and hard it has continued was not) when I didn't have to? Use your noggin. On June 22 2012 09:56 marvellosity wrote: a) because i'm unafraid b) because i get information from who and how i'm pushed On June 22 2012 10:19 marvellosity wrote: wrong way of looking at it Prob if I were scum I'd have thought more before answering matt's question. even if this conversation has been quite interesting On June 22 2012 10:13 marvellosity wrote: it means you're a very special boy <3 On June 22 2012 10:20 marvellosity wrote: who knew being the centre of attention was so tiring?! gosh On June 22 2012 10:39 marvellosity wrote: we could dance? On June 22 2012 10:43 marvellosity wrote: haha me too ^^ On June 22 2012 18:31 marvellosity wrote: What an exceptionally stupid thing to say, well done. On June 22 2012 23:05 marvellosity wrote: I didn't make a conscious decision to go 'lol gonna appear scummy now'. I read Matt's post and made a reply to it without giving it that much thought. The point being I give every post I make as scum due thought. On June 23 2012 07:15 marvellosity wrote: 'fabricated some fantasy' your posts are just littered with insidious phrases like this. On June 23 2012 07:19 marvellosity wrote: If you're trying to figure shit out, you're doing a fucking awful job of it. On June 24 2012 03:29 marvellosity wrote: No, I'm just arrogant and sarcastic. But it's not the case. stopping cause the point is made and this is getting tedious. This alongside his flip-flopping on VE, which I think is less likely then the usual confident (he called himself arrogant) town Marv. Instead of actually picking one person he decides to do three cherry picking small specific things rather than focusing in on one person and trying to get them lynched. We end up getting our second mistake from him where his case against prp is based on not even reading the day post. How can he be taken seriously as hunting scum when he isn't even following thread. I think it shows that his goal wasn't to find scum but to look like he was. We also have him pushing for marv, but look at how long it takes for him to actually switch to marv despite having him on his top 2 scum list. It takes 2 different people mentioning it for him to setup an obvious situation (who you shooting marv) to finally make a reason to justify his voting for marv. I am not confident in killing Marv, I can understand what he means about being more careful when playing as mafia. In the past when I have played as mafia I reread everything looking for things that make me seem suspicious and remove them. Everything I say seems artificially sanitized, but as town I am more concerned about finding scum regardless of peoples opinions on how I do it. I say we let him live tonight and see what mafia does knowing who our Vig is. If he lives for a while we can come back to the issue and kill him but now mafia needs to make a choice. Also mafia may not even have a roleblocker but town does, or we might have a detective who can investigate him for us etc.. I think Mattchew is Mafia and a better lynch than marv today.. ##unvote risk.nuke ##vote mattchew | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On June 27 2012 04:36 marvellosity wrote: I thought I'd explained this. I had a scumread on you prior to our big argument but took that argument as a town tell. Having had another look at LI I decided it could no longer be a town tell. Also Radfield and I, at the start of Redux, talked about WoF and his case on you. He told me that it wasn't so much his case that made him truly believe you were scum, but your response to it. It's funny because in WoF you originally made a joke to Radfield about it (basically your whole case is just a gut read) and then you backed down from it and said (paraphrasing) "lol only joking I'll answer your case properly later". The similarities are striking. VE's biggest scum-tell in WoF (from the guy who shot him in the face) was his lack of caring towards who got lynched. I think this game he clearly cares (see his anger directed at prplhz and his questioning of Mattchew's vote on rastaban). | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Yea, marvellosity was out of that dumb shit going on between you and him. Why would a scum make a 180 just so he could go 1for1 with someone? No I didn't read his huge ass filter in depth but I don't recall your case on him impressing me at all and I didn't get a scummy feeling from him. Yell at me for trying to find an alternative lynch and then 1 minute later suggest yourself that we switch to someone else. I can vote Mattchew too as I said before but I'd much rather we lynch Shraft. I don't understand his play but I always have a hard time trying to read someone who is attacking me for dumb ass reasons. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On June 27 2012 04:55 risk.nuke wrote: prplhz that's just beeing overly defensive. There is absolutely no need for a townie replacement to jump into a game and justify his formers reads. I find that deal scummy not contributing. And even it was, what else have he done that made you lean town on him or have you judged his alignment from that alone? Why the hell would someone be overly defensive when they replace into a game? He didn't do anything scummy yet because he didn't do anything yet! | ||
| ||
