meh no

I'd rather have zentor out of this game. rastaban has shown more commitment and more transparency than zentor. You are also forgetting to mention that zentor also has players like VisceraEyes and marvellosity on him. I agree that it's not looking all too great but wouldn't you rather have rastaban with you into day2 than zentor?

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 23 2012 22:00 GMT

#453

i'm pretty sure he'll flip zentor so yes he will

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 24 2012 07:45 GMT

#467

It's 9am on a sunday morning for euros (proper ones at least).

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 24 2012 21:37 GMT

#475

Yea this has been underwhelming.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 24 2012 23:30 GMT

#492

If we have a roleblocker then he should just claim who he blocked and we lynch that guy. It's that simple. The odds of us having a roleblocker AND a jailkeeper who jailed successfully should be negligible in a balanced-for-teamliquid C9++. If there is a jailkeeper and there is no roleblocker claim then this jailkeeper should think carefully if his target is now confirmed town or confirmed scum.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 24 2012 23:40 GMT

#496

1: Spend all day yelling at VisceraEyes and calling him scum
2: Assume that scum shot him because he was obviously townie
3: ???
4: Get lynched

I had another case kind of ready but I need your explanation right now. Why are you even assuming anything? What are you going to use this assumption for? What happened to analysis?

wat

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 00:11 GMT

#509

On June 25 2012 08:54 rastaban wrote:

Show nested quote +

If I understand right we have no way of knowing. The rb could have blocked someone and it was a jailer that save the hit so the rbs block didn't matter. The guy the jailer tried to save could have been the shooter, or the guys role blocked could have shot. No one claim, at least not yet as we don't know what could have happened.

Yea, I'm kind of covering all that in my post. Roleblocker claim is the best thing he can do right now, jailkeeper need to think it over if he wants to claim and he probably shouldn't unless he's very sure about himself (in which he probably can't help it but to claim).

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 00:21 GMT

#519

On June 25 2012 09:12 rastaban wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why do you want them to claim? that seems really bad to me. Am I missing something, but if they claim we still don't know who shot, there is a chance it was the person they blocked but we don't know that for sure.

I'm sorry, did you not read my post? Who is "them" in "Why do you want them to claim?"?

I don't know if you're missing something. Roleblocker is pretty useless role and if he got insanely lucky on day1 then he should claim 'cause that'll give us a lot of information and I think it's worth it.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 00:22 GMT

#521

meh marv why do you give a shit what risk and prob say

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 09:03 GMT

#562

I was roleblocked.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 09:06 GMT

#563

I was roleblocked.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 09:07 GMT

#564

lol I thought I'd written that already but then it wasn't there but then I was just on page 28

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 10:49 GMT

#570

If you guys read the thread then it should be pretty obvious that slOosh jailed me last night.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 25 2012 21:31 GMT

#620

I'm going to write something more substantial later but let me just say this real quick:

VisceraEyes

marvellosity

Stop this shit.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 26 2012 00:42 GMT

#643

Why are you saying that I don't read the thread and that I'm an easy day1 lynch marvellosity? That sounds really scummy but you seem perfectly fine with me nevertheless.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 26 2012 00:49 GMT

#646

Meh why do I have to quote the things that you literally say.

On June 26 2012 00:33 marvellosity wrote:
[...] Pushes prplhz because it's an easy thing to do.

[...]

On June 26 2012 07:38 marvellosity wrote:
[...]So instead of reading and responding to my case, he [prplhz] just saw me and VE arguing, when I was trying to present a case. Clearly then he was successful in deflecting.
[...]

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 26 2012 00:56 GMT

#649

VisceraEyes

marvellosity

How do you feel about risk.nuke?

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 26 2012 01:05 GMT

#654

Well, I don't think it's a good case. You looks like you disagree with him and then the rest is just explaining how he could still be scum in spite of what he's doing. Like, VisceraEyes cared more about the lynch yesterday than a ton of other players, why are you trying to use that in your case on him? The scummiest about VisceraEyes is that he's actually engaging in this shit with you and then partially his opinion on me around the lynch (wanted to lynch the guys I was pushing but still wanted to lynch me).

I want something more from you two on risk.nuke.