EPTI made a couple of posts on why I thought he was scum from the tone/mindset/approach of his post/vote on mK.
TL Mafia LVI - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I made a couple of posts on why I thought he was scum from the tone/mindset/approach of his post/vote on mK. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 02 2012 18:06 EchelonTee wrote: I'm going to sleep. This feels even worse than TL LV because at least then there were a number of committed, rational individuals trying to push the game forward. Atm there just seems to be a crossfire of mudslinging and arguing with brick walls, while scum slink by. Meh. I realize that I'm implying you two are stupid with my implicit posts, but at least you're fn posting. All I can conclude from many other players is that they are scum lurking or simply don't care about the game at all. Yuh, I remember you making a disparaging reference to LV earlier, and I thought LV was actually a pretty high standard game for a Normal, you do it a disservice. At the moment I just cannot fathom the logic behind drwiggles' posts. Everything is 'for information' with absolutely enormous leaps of logic on who is town and scum. drwiggles - why don't you tell us two people who you think has played most scummily so far, with reasons attached for both? Vivax - roflofloflofloflofloflofl is what I have to say to you. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
1) it is EXTREMELY UNLIKELY in a 27 player game that players are going to be pointing fingers at each other, simply statistically, on day 1. 2) Pointing fingers is only bad if it's not backed up by good reasons. I say this for your sake, please try harder. I want a lot more than a bad one sentence explanation for your suspicions. Vivax - policy ignoring you now for being stupid. kthxbye | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:12 drwiggl3s wrote: Bad one sentence explanation? I spent the last two pages explaining quite clearly my thoughts and reasons as to why Mattchew would be the most beneficial lynch right now. Go back and read them if you need any extra explanation, as I'm positive it was all covered there. basically i can see it's lynching for information. which is a god awful reason to lynch someone. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'll come back to the thread when someone productive is around. Toodles. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
If he is unable to read the thread, then there isn't a lot of point. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
There was once a cute little puppy called Vivax. And he lived with his kind and benevolent owner, Mr. marvellosity. One fine summer's day, marvellosity had invited over some friends over for a light lunch with champagne and strawberries. But the cute little puppy Vivax was barking and running around annoying all the guests. "What is wrong with him?" ShiaoPi asked, concerned. "He wants another biscuit," answered marvellosity. "But if I were to give him another, he would get indigestion. I try to explain to the poor pup, but alas he does not understand as he is only a puppy." "That is a shame," nodded Acrofales, knowingly. Vivax the puppy was getting more and more wound up as he barked at people and no-one would listen. Why could he not have another biscuit? What kind of unnatural cruelty was denying him one of the great pleasures of puppy life? It seems he had forgotten that he had already had a biscuit, the poor pup. Eventually the little pup lost the plot, and with his little tail and ears flying, charged at his loving owner, marvellosity, barking and yelping, paws racing. marvellosity merely smiled, and put his finger against poor pup Vivax's forehead, watching him running on the spot to no avail. Eventually marvellosity picked poor pup Vivax up by the scruff of his neck, and put him in his cage. Hopefully the pup would be calmer after he slept a little. The End | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
ghost was probably just being lazy. He promised us a 'full report', so let's see what we get from that. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Other than your "I don't think he's new point" can you particularly tell me why this is bad scummy as opposed to just bad townie? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
My question is not dependent on yours, so please go ahead and answer it. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Re: VE. Not sure yet. It could be his wbg bumming from Movie having an effect on his play here. He could genuinely be trying to tone things down a bit. Acrofales - seems to have a pretty solid filter. The only real incongruence I found was that he made a case on BKexe only to later say that he didn't really want to lynch him at all, which doesn't add up so well. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I also like your point about not even trying to defend himself even though he is clearly reading the thread. What do you make of his play since the lynch? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Post 1 is a blatant misrepresentation of what occurred in the thread, along with the bullshit information stuff Post 2 is playing all wise after the event. As usual "too scummy to be scum" is not a defence. Especially when, as you point out, it's tacked on to his "I can't see what people saw as scummy" view. Then there's the insidiousness of pointing the finger at the instigator of the lynch (in this case me). To make it clear again: I have no clue how his posts were read as scum Is that an obvious "scum post"? Yes ... | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
| ||
