All of you claiming the lynch on foxtrotter was that bad, why didn't you show some more activity to prevent it them?
TL Mafia LVI - Page 39
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
All of you claiming the lynch on foxtrotter was that bad, why didn't you show some more activity to prevent it them? | ||
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
On July 02 2012 20:04 Hyaach wrote: I wanted BKE to contribute before i slept. When i came back, it was 7.30 am i had to rush off. I glanced the thread and saw people i have town read on are actually wishy washy about BKE lynch. My vote on mKmK was a pressure vote and there was zero response. So i took the best way out, lynch the next proposed target. okay, now that you have caught up on the thread what are your scumreads? | ||
Vivax
21769 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:55 ShiaoPi wrote: And tell me that is "no reason" to lynch somebody, and if you cba to read marv, I'll put it shortly: -lurking -calling out a lurker and voting him, while doing nothing else himself -simple sheeping The point is, marv said that these weren't the reasons. His final resons were FT's 'mindset' and 'intentions'. I already asked marv why he didn't target others who fulfilled the above criteria (lurking etc.), and instead got a bandwagon up on a specific one of them. I also mentioned grush as one of them. Instead of explaining why he picked FT over others, he said that these weren't his reasons for picking him and justified it with his gut feeling. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
If he is unable to read the thread, then there isn't a lot of point. | ||
NoSmurfHere
New Zealand613 Posts
A lot of players look pretty terrible actually | ||
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
Please please improve your reading comprehension @marv: One at least has to try ![]() | ||
Vivax
21769 Posts
| ||
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
On July 02 2012 20:12 Vivax wrote: Don't even know why I reply to someone who I believe to be scum. Go ahead and make your case then | ||
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
| ||
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
There was once a cute little puppy called Vivax. And he lived with his kind and benevolent owner, Mr. marvellosity. One fine summer's day, marvellosity had invited over some friends over for a light lunch with champagne and strawberries. But the cute little puppy Vivax was barking and running around annoying all the guests. "What is wrong with him?" ShiaoPi asked, concerned. "He wants another biscuit," answered marvellosity. "But if I were to give him another, he would get indigestion. I try to explain to the poor pup, but alas he does not understand as he is only a puppy." "That is a shame," nodded Acrofales, knowingly. Vivax the puppy was getting more and more wound up as he barked at people and no-one would listen. Why could he not have another biscuit? What kind of unnatural cruelty was denying him one of the great pleasures of puppy life? It seems he had forgotten that he had already had a biscuit, the poor pup. Eventually the little pup lost the plot, and with his little tail and ears flying, charged at his loving owner, marvellosity, barking and yelping, paws racing. marvellosity merely smiled, and put his finger against poor pup Vivax's forehead, watching him running on the spot to no avail. Eventually marvellosity picked poor pup Vivax up by the scruff of his neck, and put him in his cage. Hopefully the pup would be calmer after he slept a little. The End | ||
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21769 Posts
| ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On July 02 2012 07:54 marvellosity wrote: of course, i'm starting a lynch on some random person instead of bandwagoning. Read and vote with me. On July 02 2012 09:39 ghost_403 wrote: MATTCHEW DON'T LEAVE ME Who we voting for. On July 02 2012 09:44 ghost_403 wrote: Fine. If you guys won't tell me who to vote for, I'll vote for the guy in the lead. ##vote:foxtrotter hmph. On July 02 2012 09:33 Twelve wrote: ##unvote ##vote: Foxtrotter I shall leave this here for you to think about it. You are terrible, terrible detectives. | ||
Foxtrotter
United States6 Posts
Well that sucked! ![]() Sorry I was not at home to defend my self once the votes starting swinging. I hope everyone has a good game! (...and hey! Why am I the one who is cleaning up shit?!) ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21769 Posts
On July 02 2012 21:01 marvellosity wrote: Kurumi, you are misrepresenting my post in isolation a little bit there, my dear. How about you comment on the other two. They are valid lynch candidates for me. Count me in. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
ghost was probably just being lazy. He promised us a 'full report', so let's see what we get from that. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 02 2012 07:46 austinmcc wrote: My vote is currently on mK. However, for anyone uncomfortable with their current lynch candidate, I'd suggest taking a look at drwiggl3s. Seriously. The Good Doctor's filter is the following: (1) As has been mentioned, the OP had the "role name" bit, and we can assume if scum got a VT fakeclaim it had the same text. Role name wasn't indicative of mK's alignment, not indicative of the Good Doctor's alignment either. (2) The ol' ninja vote BKE. (3) Nine hours later Stop and read that third post. Please. The only post of any substance. The Good Doctor thought BKE looked scummy, but didn't mention that and didn't vote for BKE. However, after CASUALMAN of all people voted for BKE, BKE and Mattchew voted for casualman with little explanation. This makes BKE scum in drwiggl3s head. Here is how casualman voted, by the way:Either casualman is trolling and trolling hard, or casualman just dropped a vote that legitimately should make every go "Wtf is this?" That's a legitimate response to casualman's comment and vote. BKE's wtf is this vote for casualman is the tipping point that makes drwiggl3s read BKE as scummy and vote him, which is a terrible reason given casualman's post and vote. I don't necessarily read casualman as scummy yet, but drwiggl3s also drops a little explanation for why casualman dropped his stupid post. What is this? Seriously. What is this? Everyone reads casulman's post as trolling or stupidity, and here is drwiggl3s trying to defend another player's nonsense post without prompting. WHY is he doing this? Moreover, how in the world do you get "He might be new or he might have read BKE scummy before others did" out of casualman's post? Finally, I have to point this out. Because I think drwiggl3s is lying. I don't know about you guys, but I did a lot of lurking here before playing. drwiggl3s makes sure to tell us it's his first game, but then his only post of substance is describing why BKE looks a little scummier because people are SOFT DEFENDING BKE. That's not a "This is my first day cycle playing mafia" thought in my mind. That's not my thought process in the first thing I ever post. Either casualman is lying about not being a smurf, or casualman got fed that reasoning by scumbuddies. I actually lean towards the former, because casualman created his account 5/1/2012. Fresh account + "Oh I'm a newb, bear with me" + comments about soft defense = lying about being new in my mind. ***NEW ADDED POINT*** - anyone who thinks that drwiggl3s is ACTUALLY new is going to have to be convinced that him saying he's new outweighs the soft defense reference as well as the fact that he just happened to name himself drwiggl3s and joined mrwiggles' game. Does the naming thing not make others think smurf over new player? tl;dr
I am currently voting mK. I am alright with my vote on mK. But the one player I'd absolutely be willing to swap to, or to try and get others to swap to, is drwiggl3s Shiaopi and solstice, how do you guys read drwiggl3s. Both D1 and overall, if you can separate those two things. Also, for marv, I'd like for you to take another look at his D1. Now that you are no longer pushing foxtrot, do you still read wiggl3s the same way? | ||
| ||