|
On July 02 2012 18:57 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2012 18:56 Acrofales wrote:On July 02 2012 18:49 Vivax wrote:Poor poor acrofales. Posting such a huge case and then he gets zero attention for it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" I'll give you some: Get your things straight, thinking I'd be mafia is ridiculous.Let's string up people for the FT mislynch.I told you the cases against him were bullshit and more of a policy lynch than anything else. That said, marv, I don't see you drawing conclusions after his death, but you criticisized mine before his death for being premature. You contribute zero to town except for causing bandwagons, and your posts are numerous, but not helpful. I'll anticipate what I'm gonna do day2. ##Vote marvellosity Don't worry, I'll push it when people start waking up. DrWiggl3s burying it in spam is not making you look any better either. Ok, kingdede. Why don't you keep pushing your BM policy lynch like day 1? You seem to have a lot of backup from people like VE. I'm still hoping someone will shoot BM tonight. Otherwise I will be very happy with a BM lynch tomorrow too!
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 02 2012 18:06 EchelonTee wrote: I'm going to sleep. This feels even worse than TL LV because at least then there were a number of committed, rational individuals trying to push the game forward. Atm there just seems to be a crossfire of mudslinging and arguing with brick walls, while scum slink by. Meh.
I realize that I'm implying you two are stupid with my implicit posts, but at least you're fn posting. All I can conclude from many other players is that they are scum lurking or simply don't care about the game at all.
Yuh, I remember you making a disparaging reference to LV earlier, and I thought LV was actually a pretty high standard game for a Normal, you do it a disservice.
At the moment I just cannot fathom the logic behind drwiggles' posts. Everything is 'for information' with absolutely enormous leaps of logic on who is town and scum. drwiggles - why don't you tell us two people who you think has played most scummily so far, with reasons attached for both?
Vivax - roflofloflofloflofloflofl is what I have to say to you.
|
On July 02 2012 08:19 marvellosity wrote: Vivax, you clearly don't understand where I'm coming from them. It's a mindset thing. It's not the fact he's (Foxtrotter) lurking, it's the tone of his post and how he puts it across.
Where do you come from then, where they teach you to make such bad subjective reads?
|
BKexe and Mattchew. Quickest to point fingers at others, while never pointing fingers at each other.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
drwiggles - I want you to expand a bit more on this.
1) it is EXTREMELY UNLIKELY in a 27 player game that players are going to be pointing fingers at each other, simply statistically, on day 1.
2) Pointing fingers is only bad if it's not backed up by good reasons.
I say this for your sake, please try harder. I want a lot more than a bad one sentence explanation for your suspicions.
Vivax - policy ignoring you now for being stupid. kthxbye
|
Bad one sentence explanation? I spent the last two pages explaining quite clearly my thoughts and reasons as to why Mattchew would be the most beneficial lynch right now. Go back and read them if you need any extra explanation, as I'm positive it was all covered there.
|
On July 02 2012 18:58 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2012 18:55 Mandalor wrote:On July 02 2012 18:52 Acrofales wrote: Okay, lets do it your way. Lets assume mK is town and BKE and Mattchew are scum.
At the time the Fox lynch was proposed mK was set to be lynched, at 10 votes to 7. What reason does a scum Mattchew or Marvellosity have to push forward another townie to be sacrificed? It actually increased the chances of scumbuddy BKE getting lynched. This makes NO SENSE.
When you can explain how your reasoning works, I may be willing to listen to you.
I think you're talking to vivax, but I'm gonna answer this for myself: Possible modkill of mK. If mK is town and inactive, there's a chance he will be modkilled and mafia could get two kills in pretty much one day by swaying the public opinion to another townie. Was talking to wiggl3s, but your answer is fine. Hadn't thought of that. It sounds like a hell of a lot of effort (and risk) to put into getting an extra townie killed. At least it's plausible tho. Now, other than the late addition of a townie to Mattchew's list of death, mind making a case that isn't connection-based with BKE until we, you know, flip BKE as scum?
Yeah it's a risky move, but one potentially worth taking in matt's position. mK could be scum tho, I don't know. I just wanted to point out a possible reason to defend mK as mafia even if he's town.
Mattchew lives off his reputation and most of town seems to buy it. I will try to make a good post for my case on Matt after the night. I also wanna hear his reason for the fox addition to his list.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:12 drwiggl3s wrote: Bad one sentence explanation? I spent the last two pages explaining quite clearly my thoughts and reasons as to why Mattchew would be the most beneficial lynch right now. Go back and read them if you need any extra explanation, as I'm positive it was all covered there.
basically i can see it's lynching for information. which is a god awful reason to lynch someone.
|
On July 02 2012 08:37 marvellosity wrote: Vivax, again you're not getting it.
On July 02 2012 08:41 marvellosity wrote: Please learn to read properly before asking questions.
On July 02 2012 09:16 marvellosity wrote: Vivax, how about we don't try to draw connections before anyone's even flipped, eh?
Your premises are terrible anyway.
On July 02 2012 19:01 marvellosity wrote: Vivax - roflofloflofloflofloflofl is what I have to say to you.
On July 02 2012 19:10 marvellosity wrote: Vivax - policy ignoring you now for being stupid. kthxbye
The guy marv pushed turned out to be a mislynched lurker.
Note: Designed for town and the vigi. Gonna repost if it gets buried under misleading posts.
|
On July 02 2012 19:18 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2012 19:12 drwiggl3s wrote: Bad one sentence explanation? I spent the last two pages explaining quite clearly my thoughts and reasons as to why Mattchew would be the most beneficial lynch right now. Go back and read them if you need any extra explanation, as I'm positive it was all covered there. basically i can see it's lynching for information. which is a god awful reason to lynch someone.
Really? Worse then lynching someone for being a slight lurker?
Do you know how to play this game?
You killed a townie last night my friend. I suggest you spend more time thinking about your posts.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Alright.
I'll come back to the thread when someone productive is around.
Toodles.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
Sooo just caught up on the thread, let's see:
@Acrofales: Your case on Vivax does have merit, but sadly I would say that he is town. I played with him two newbie games, one in which he was scum and one in which he was town. His play here is pretty much a "logical" fit of his townplay. (look at NMM XV, where I more or less led his mislynch). his scum play is much more cautious and lurky than what he is doing right now (NMM XVI for reference). I am by no means happy about his playstyle but it looks town.
@Mandalor: I actually think we should wait for the nighthit and some discussion before agreeing on a lynch for d2. It gives more information we can work on. And I do not like the idea of flipping yet another coin with a lurker lynch (which is most of Mattchews list).
@drwiggles: You are making no sense at all. Seriously what the hell have you been doing the whole day cycle? You had only 3 posts, which accumalte to zero content and a badly explained vote on the bandwagon that was at the time on BKE. Now come night you just burst in and throw suspicion on the people who have contributed. If you disliked the lynch on fox why didn't you say so and actively tried to prevent it? Oh wait, you were actively lurking.... Also your fixation on lynching mattchew for "information" is really unsettling, goal of the game is to lynch scum... There are a lot of logical gaps in your posts and the whole matter of coming in after the lynch and just gunning for someone is something I really dislike.
FoS: drwiggl3s
@casualman
On July 02 2012 18:38 casualman wrote: I propose no talking during the night
Like seriously? Stop trolling and do something for a change.
@Vivax: I do not agree on your read on marv, sure he led a mislynch, but being wrong is no scumtrait. Also the way it unfolded marv looked really town just go and check his filter.
|
It was actually Canada day so I wasn't able to post before the lynch. The lynch is because I think he's scum. But even if you can't agree on that, unless something interesting happens this night cycle, the lynch on him would give us the most information as to who is and who isn't scum.
Also you say you don't like me gunning for someone right after a lynch. Did you not read Mattchew's first post after the lynch? He says Foxtrott deserved the be lynch anyway (as a semi-sorry lurker? what?) and immediately pointed a finger at twelve (how on earth is twelve scum?).
|
hi guys catching up on thread. seems FT lynch didnt turn out so well.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
Well, your inactivity would have looked a lot better if you say so beforehand, you know, establishing credibilty and stuff. Now onto mattchew. His list generated discussion for town, which is good and also neatly piled up all the "scummy lurkers", which was a good thing. Why are you so intent on lynching for information? Mattchews line about "deserving" I interpreted as simply one lurker down, if he had been interested in this game he might have defended himself? A mislynch on a townie is bad but foxtrot did nothing that helped town, so it is kind of "deserving" as anti-town play is especially play we want to make out and eliminate, so to me there is nothing wrong with that quote.
Your conclusion that if mattchew dies all ppl on the list are town is just wrong. Bussing has always happened and will always continue to happen.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:44 Hyaach wrote: hi guys catching up on thread. seems FT lynch didnt turn out so well.
Why did you ninjavote him?
|
On July 02 2012 19:39 ShiaoPi wrote: @Vivax: I do not agree on your read on marv, sure he led a mislynch, but being wrong is no scumtrait. Also the way it unfolded marv looked really town just go and check his filter.
'Being wrong is no scumtrait'.
What kind of generalization is that. There were no good objective reasons to kill foxtrotter, and I kept asking marv about his reasons.
He wasn't just wrong with his bad 'read', he also openly refused to justify his case by insulting me whenever I asked him something.
And I'm writing this to town players, not to ShiaoPi.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:50 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2012 19:39 ShiaoPi wrote: @Vivax: I do not agree on your read on marv, sure he led a mislynch, but being wrong is no scumtrait. Also the way it unfolded marv looked really town just go and check his filter. 'Being wrong is no scumtrait'. What kind of generalization is that. There were no good objective reasons to kill foxtrotter, and I kept asking marv about his reasons. He wasn't just wrong with his bad 'read', he also openly refused to justify his case by insulting me whenever I asked him something. And I'm writing this to town players, not to ShiaoPi.
It is a generalization, which I learned by myself for being wrong (remember heist in NMM XVI?).
Read this:
On July 02 2012 07:42 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote:Alright Matt. But you know how I felt about your posting in MTG :> looks to me like Foxtrotter or mkmkmkmk. On July 02 2012 03:40 Foxtrotter wrote:Sorry i haven't posted yet ladies and gentles was a little busy and had to catch up. I've read through the thread and my opinion is that everything mK has done (or lack of) up to this point seems scummy. The fact that he has not defended him self is extremely unsettling to me. (I hope that nothing personal has happened.) With his comment of however, On June 30 2012 10:12 mKmKmK wrote:On June 30 2012 10:06 NoSmurfHere wrote: I am a Role Name.
how quaint. vague post is vague... I am pretty comfortable voting for him on D1. ##vote mK This post makes me feel icky. Apologies for being absent, votes for mkmkmkmk for making a post - doesn't even say why the post is bad - and then continues to be absent. Because I love myself so much, I'm quoting myself. Can we make a Foxtrotter lynch happen? The post really screams newbie scum MO all over it. Apologising for absence, and then the excuses for voting mkmkmk - calls him a lurker basically "everything mK has done (or lack of)" despite doing even less himself. Then posts a random post of mk's like this is damning evidence. Everything about it feels like it's a scumbie who feels they have to post and doing so by appearing to try to contribute. But the whole post is actually devoid of anything. ##Vote: Foxtrotter
And tell me that is "no reason" to lynch somebody, and if you cba to read marv, I'll put it shortly: -lurking -calling out a lurker and voting him, while doing nothing else himself -simple sheeping
|
I also agree there was no valid reason to kill Foxtrotter. Any suspicions raised against him were just grasping at straws as far as I'm concerned.
|
I wanted BKE to contribute before i slept. When i came back, it was 7.30 am i had to rush off. I glanced the thread and saw people i have town read on are actually wishy washy about BKE lynch. My vote on mKmK was a pressure vote and there was zero response. So i took the best way out, lynch the next proposed target.
|
|
|
|