On July 02 2012 03:40 Foxtrotter wrote:
Sorry i haven't posted yet ladies and gentles was a little busy and had to catch up.
I've read through the thread and my opinion is that everything mK has done (or lack of) up to this point seems scummy.
The fact that he has not defended him self is extremely unsettling to me. (I hope that nothing personal has happened.)

With his comment of however,

Show nested quote +

I am pretty comfortable voting for him on D1.

##vote mK

This post makes me feel icky. Apologies for being absent, votes for mkmkmkmk for making a post - doesn't even say why the post is bad - and then continues to be absent.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:42 GMT

#575

On July 02 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote:
Alright Matt. But you know how I felt about your posting in MTG :>

looks to me like Foxtrotter or mkmkmkmk.

Show nested quote +

This post makes me feel icky. Apologies for being absent, votes for mkmkmkmk for making a post - doesn't even say why the post is bad - and then continues to be absent.

Because I love myself so much, I'm quoting myself.

Can we make a Foxtrotter lynch happen? The post really screams newbie scum MO all over it. Apologising for absence, and then the excuses for voting mkmkmk - calls him a lurker basically "everything mK has done (or lack of)" despite doing even less himself. Then posts a random post of mk's like this is damning evidence.

Everything about it feels like it's a scumbie who feels they have to post and doing so by appearing to try to contribute. But the whole post is actually devoid of anything.

##Vote: Foxtrotter

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:49 GMT

#579

austin, sheep me instead bro

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:50 GMT

#580

As much as Bill Nurray (see what I did there) is always a good lynch target, Acro, not today :>

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:52 GMT

#582

read my post on Foxtrotter just a few ago and tell me why you don't want to lynch him ^^

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:54 GMT

#584

of course, i'm starting a lynch on some random person instead of bandwagoning. Read and vote with me.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:58 GMT

#589

On July 02 2012 07:57 Acrofales wrote:
My read on mk was saummy lurker. Flxtroller agrees. Foxtrotter is also a scummy luriker. Not sure which one is scum :S

acro, the point is that the scummy lurker is calling the scummy lurker scum. hypocrite central with wishy washy thrown in for good measure.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 22:59 GMT

#591

I think BKexe might have just tied himself up in knots and I'm not confident that means he's necessarily scum. He's active enough that getting a good read on him in the coming days should be possible, whereas I feel we could be getting it wrong today.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36160 Posts

July 01 2012 23:08 GMT

#595

Now you asked I had to go take a look. Just looks like a bunch of confused and pointless babble, which I don't read as that scummy. And the fact someone said "soft defended" doesn't not make them a noob, although I get where you're coming from.

I'm more comfortable with my lynch ta. If I ask myself "what are the scum motivations for drwiggles/foxtrotter's posts?", I have to jump through less hoops for Foxtrotter.