|
On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars.
the fucking dick strikes again
|
Tunkeg, the thing is he's not really...that's what really infuriates me about his play...he's NOT actually a fucking dick...at least, not that I'm aware of.
Anyway, I'm letting it go for now. I'm assuming he's playing this way because he's scum, feel free to disagree or be skeptical or whatever. He'll prove it soon enough if he actually is scum.
|
also btw I'm going to direct medics.
Protect marvellosity. Don't touch me. Don't touch VE. Maybe consider Mattchew. But really, protect marvellosity. If he's scum at this point then I don't particularly care because I'm actually enjoying playing with him.
I'm willing to die because if I die then at least then I'll be confirmed town.
|
On May 26 2012 08:09 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars. the fucking dick strikes again
You want to have WBG modkilled as well the marv? Equality or?
|
not that I don't enjoy playing with the rest of you  but he can scumhunt!
|
On May 26 2012 08:11 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2012 08:09 wherebugsgo wrote:On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars. the fucking dick strikes again You want to have WBG modkilled as well the marv? Equality or?
what, for insulting myself, or mocking you?
mad scum is mad sounds like
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 26 2012 08:11 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2012 08:09 wherebugsgo wrote:On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars. the fucking dick strikes again You want to have WBG modkilled as well the marv? Equality or?
Just for the giggles, I will explain without sarcasm.
What did I do? I swore at Matt after he swore at me 3 times in a post
What did wbg do? He used your own words in retaliation against a completely unfair insult from you.
What did you do? You had a big strop about people being insulting, you basically gave up playing the game, and THEN you outrageously swore at someone without provocation.
|
On May 26 2012 08:09 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars. the fucking dick strikes again
This was before you started your BM crusade. And in fact I won't be picking fights, just to not shit up the thread, cause if I were to respond to every insult from you in this game, it would have been 20 pages of shitslining. So I'll leave it at that. I am playing to my winconditions by not replying to you anymore, and by sheeping VE.
|
On May 26 2012 08:13 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2012 08:09 wherebugsgo wrote:On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars. the fucking dick strikes again This was before you started your BM crusade. And in fact I won't be picking fights, just to not shit up the thread, cause if I were to respond to every insult from you in this game, it would have been 20 pages of shitslining. So I'll leave it at that. I am playing to my winconditions by not replying to you anymore, and by sheeping VE.
I'd love to see quotes of my apparent BM crusade.
|
hahaha this is fun though actually. Tunkeg actually seems mad and I didn't even do anything.
It's almost funnier than when I try to make someone mad when I'm scum.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 26 2012 08:15 wherebugsgo wrote:
hahaha this is fun though actually. Tunkeg actually seems mad and I didn't even do anything.
It's almost funnier than when I try to make someone mad when I'm scum.
Is that a scumclaim wbg? 
|
On May 26 2012 08:13 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2012 08:11 Tunkeg wrote:On May 26 2012 08:09 wherebugsgo wrote:On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
That was a pretty quick start after we were full.
Anyways I have decided to play this game in a different manner then before. And if I can make it work I will continue in the games to follow.
Previous games
The Tunkeg of old was all about reaction based reads, which meant that I would provoke certain players to get a reaction. I would have a hypothesis about how they would respond as town and how they would respond as scum, and work off off that. The way I would do this was:
A: Suggest some kind of plan (or taking sides, and arguing for or against if someone else proposed a plan).
B: Picking fights.
Why change it up?
Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting.
So what am I changing it to?
My goal in these games is to figure people out. Sure I definitely want to win, I hate losing, but more than winning I want to be right. To be right I will need to focus on my analysis, instead of fighting. What this means is:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap. I will try to format my posts better.
2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one. This also means I won’t be spending a lot of time defending my actions. If my posts are scummy you lynch me, if my posts aren’t you don’t .
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. Again, I will try to post quality posts, and not many posts, meaning I won’t spend my time defending my analysis, I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.
lynch all liars. the fucking dick strikes again You want to have WBG modkilled as well the marv? Equality or? Just for the giggles, I will explain without sarcasm. What did I do? I swore at Matt after he swore at me 3 times in a postWhat did wbg do? He used your own words in retaliation against a completely unfair insult from you. What did you do? You had a big strop about people being insulting, you basically gave up playing the game, and THEN you outrageously swore at someone without provocation.
I get more insulted by WBG's you are stupid remark than being called a dick. So then it must be WBG 10 me 1 in this regard. I am not just talking about this game in your regard marv. I find you BM, thats all.
|
The opposite - he's trying to implant the idea that what he's doing now and the thing he mentioned look different when in fact they're exactly the same. Subtle psychology thing.
|
On May 26 2012 08:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
The opposite - he's trying to implant the idea that what he's doing now and the thing he mentioned look different when in fact they're exactly the same. Subtle psychology thing.
rofl
manipulative wbg strikes again
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I think you mistake BM for aggressive. It's an extremely rare thing indeed where I will directly insult someone.
Anyway, are we going to do some scumhunting today or are we going to wait for tomorrow?
Who do people think are good lynch targets at the moment?
|
I know right?! ^^ If you don't like it stop doing it. 
|
On May 26 2012 08:18 marvellosity wrote:
I think you mistake BM for aggressive. It's an extremely rare thing indeed where I will directly insult someone.
Anyway, are we going to do some scumhunting today or are we going to wait for tomorrow?
Who do people think are good lynch targets at the moment?
Aggressive is good, and fine. If you make it with points. I would like to see you in any setting go up to someone and call them stupid, and not expect at least being called a dick.
|
At this point, I'm actually in favor of lynching Mattchew tbh. What do you think marv?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
Well played Marv, your post helped to push my doubts about Zealos' claim into action (i.e. swapping my vote). Of Katina and Acid who would we most want to kill tomorrow? I need to look at Acid's filtre as if what WBG says is true then he may be a better target than Katina (despite my previous votes on her).
Re why pick Hiro over N_T? Perhaps because N_T is scum and though the gambit proposed by B is a risky one Zealos was already grasping at straws trying to prevent a bandwagon and such a gambit seems awfully risky. All N_T has done is sheep/buddy Marv and though I think Katina and Acid are better targets I hope people take a better look at him.
I'm going to sleep and moving out tomorrow but I'll be in touch witht he thread hopefully on and off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
