| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 30 2012 09:48 VisceraEyes wrote: Mattchew what do you think about WBG's observation about Gambit? It could be true... It also could be shooting a solid vet before he has the chance to make reads... I think gambit needs to die | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On May 30 2012 09:48 wherebugsgo wrote: Shut up Toad you're not worth a mafia bullet. You cause so much disruption regardless of alignment it's no wonder everyone calls you hypnotoad. We kill gambit man today. He ninja voted ET yesterday and he's said nothing. Eat shit and die, scum. ##vote Gambitx32 Whoa there buddy, we don't lynch lurkers here...we shoot scummy lurkers with holy bullets of townie fury....not hang them. How about we lynch someone who's posting so we can get information with our lynch? Ya? No? I like your target other than the fact that his lynch will net us no new information. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
If we had no vigis and all 6 scum lurked, by your plan none of them would ever die. Can't have that, now can we? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
and then I was like: G32's filter ._. .___________________________. ##vote Gambitx32 | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On May 30 2012 09:56 wherebugsgo wrote: No, I lynch scum and scum exist indiscriminately of their posting activity. If we had no vigis and all 6 scum lurked, by your plan none of them would ever die. Can't have that, now can we? We absolutely can't, and if I were convinced that all 6 scum were lurking I'd definitely be down with lynching a scummy lurker...but as it stands, D2, I personally would rather find active scum. You can count on my support if it's needed though Bugs...Gambit has definitely gotta go one way or the other. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
However, I'd rather wait to vote until we've got a bit more information rather than during the first hour or two after the night post. I'm also still waiting to hear an answer to my questions for stofu, his posts look similar to me. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
I am counting on people giving me a break to read the thread, so don't expect too much from me immediately. At least I am replacing in fairly early into the game. It's about time I won a game so I will be putting in the effort here. The roster looks good and from my initial read some of the vets are looking pretty townie so we have no reason not to win. Note: To help get an idea on people's thoughts, please ask me some specific questions. It is always hard when catching up to get a feel for people because the timing of posts is hard to work out. So fire away and I will do my best. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 30 2012 10:03 Blazinghand wrote: S&B bussing For once... We agree | ||
|
jaj22
United Kingdom1376 Posts
##vote GambitX32 Either that or Zealos, but he's got some activity excuse until the second half of day 2 so there's not much point in prodding him. I'd love to find active scum but I'm not even convinced that there are any. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
That plus a claimed hit is the extent of the case on Gambit. If we're lynching players for lurking and looking scummy when they don't, everyone seems pretty set that Zealos looks actively scummy. Why should we lynch Gambit based off your claimed hit and poor posting, when Zealos has had poor posting and seems less likely to modkill himself out of the game? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
If we're looking to lynch inactivity/lurking, why should I vote Gambit over cwave and phagga? I'm happy to vote Gambit if there's a reason that doesn't apply to 2 or 3 others. If we're just going to go after "scummy lurkers," I'd prefer to go after the one that's least likely to get modkilled for inactivity. Zealos is the only one of those 4 that's managed to post every cycle. Don't get me wrong here, lurking mafia won my last game easy. We DID hit the point that the only scum left were lurkers, and town just killed itself off. I'm absolutely not against lynching into our lurkers. But mainly I want to know why Gambit over Zealos. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
jaj22
United Kingdom1376 Posts
To complete the nightkill list, MZ's public scumreads were Kitaman and Mattchew. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
The fuck kind of defense is that? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On May 30 2012 10:16 jaj22 wrote: Well, ideally Gambit would realise that the pressure on him is serious, and post enough as a result that we can tell whether he's scum or town. I'm never sure what the right amount of pressure is though. I tried the half-assed method and that got one post out of him. To complete the nightkill list, MZ's public scumreads were Kitaman and Mattchew. I thing the right amount of pressure is to just lynch him ^^ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 RotterdaM StarCraft: Brood War 1003ByuN  414TKL  380IndyStarCraft  259SteadfastSC  147ProTech134 ZombieGrub92 BRAT_OK  92MindelVK 14EnDerr 1Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Liquid`RaSZi3239 FrodaN1139 Beastyqt819 B2W.Neo623 ceh9546 mouzStarbuck208 ArmadaUGS134 KnowMe107 C9.Mang095 Dewaltoss85 QueenE81 UpATreeSC68 Trikslyr66 Mew2King50 Chillindude18 |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
