|
On May 19 2012 23:27 zelblade wrote: Welp I guess we just have to go with the obvious conclusion that caller is caller, or maybe the number of members of the scum teams could be uneven.
Can we change the cycles to 24/24? Caller told us not to co-host too much, so I won't asnwer your question.
|
What does that even mean -_-
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Translation: BITCHES GET OF MY THRONE
|
On May 19 2012 10:30 Mr. PotatoHead wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2012 23:35 Acrofales wrote: Okay. No clue about SC2Mafia... I was just surprised that a first-time player would figure your "trap" was a good idea (regardless of alignment). I'd like to hear your reasoning behind it. Is it common in SC2Mafia to do this kinda thing? It's not exactly common, Show nested quote +On May 13 2012 02:32 Mr. PotatoHead wrote: actually i just sorta showed up late and made the best of it but w/e But it is fairly common (in public games) for town members to do light trolling. That's kinda why I wanted to start in this game first, I love trying to troll my way through games and win anyway in SC2 mafia. This forum mafia stuff is kinda serious >.<
 Anyway, we're gonna win this. Just protect Drazerk, okay?
|
So I should still shoot nisani right?
I guess he could be trying to bluff me into thinking he has an extra life, but even I he succeeds he gets lynched tomorrow so I don't know what that gains him.
|
Who is Carolus going to shoot? Or does he have to choose between shooting and protecting?
|
Carolus' shot, and the other DT actions can be communicated in private, to keep that information private from scum. While we've pretty much won this game, there isn't much reason to give scum information for free by saying things in the thread. The reason Carolus' protecting Zelblade is in the thread is because that was already agreed upon anyway.
|
Oh, and yes. Please shoot Nisani.
|
On May 19 2012 08:42 Carolus Magnus wrote: Worst strategy ever by the red team, how exactly were they planning on winning if they just bus/push to get their whole team lynched on day 1. Even if they happen to earn some town cred like that, you can still just get shot by the other team. I suppose it's clear by now that the teams aren't symmetrical and the last one or two blues could be any role, including count. Only scum were lynch candidates on Day one...Jesus...
|
Right, I forgot that one of the roles could mason with people without marrying them.
I do want to say, don't shoot someone who's been involved and mostly pro-town without discussing it first in the thread. In this list I would include myself, Forumite, and Carolus, as well as you four in the "Emperor's Cabinet." (ie, acro, zelblade, hassy, and drazerk.)
We've been doing a really good job as a town so far in balancing decisiveness with steering clear of Sandroba-style authoritarianism. Since I think pretty much the only way we could lose this game now is if one of you four is scum or third party, I think we should keep up this record.
|
"Your spouse has died, and you get the role of Viscount von Guard, it gives you 1 additional vote."
Acro, I don't understand. Do you want me to jail you, or passively protect both you and Hassybaby??
|
opz, i am confused about your claim. I thought you had a single role as jailer. I don't understand your passive role. Which one is the bulletproof thing?
|
On May 20 2012 02:43 Acrofales wrote: opz, i am confused about your claim. I thought you had a single role as jailer. I don't understand your passive role. Which one is the bulletproof thing? I'm not bulletproof....I lied to Prplhz
Passive protects the emperor and emperess, no one is role blocked
Active, occupy one person all night, which protects this person, and role blocks this person.
|
On May 18 2012 02:50 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2012 17:54 Acrofales wrote: Okay, so throw all the setup speculation out the window for now. Until we actually find 6 scum on a team, I don't want to believe that's the case. We don't even know that both scumteams are the same size, btw. They might be balanced by having different wincons, or watching the roleclaims fly around they might not be balanced at all in any way shape or form.
If we're back to regular scumhunting, I still like Dog for the red scumteam for the reasons outlined in my night post.
@Opz: something is wrong about your roleclaim, but I need to talk to Drazerk about it and Hassy is offline. You are sticking with your story and not claiming that that was a roleclaim to scum to throw them off?
In other news, I am still suspicious of Carolus for all the back-and-forth defense between him and Quatol+QS7. Will be looking into that. Eh. I lied to prphlz a lil about my roleclaim. I knew if he was mafia, someone would press for my lynch the next opportunity. Actually, I don't protect myself AND the emperor. I protect the emperor and the empress. =/ But I can jail people at night, which protects/roleblocks them. I didn't lie about that portion of my role to him or ya'll. I figured prphlz was mafia right from the get go of him becoming my wife. =D
|
Opz you should continue using your passive.
|
then yeah, duh. protect both of us. does that make us bulletproof? or just 1 hit?
|
actually, don't bother telling us. we don't care.
|
|
Erandor was chancellor checked. He checked as town spymaster. Him being spymaster has been independently verified, because he actually used his ability N1.
|
Oh I thought chancellor could do role or family alignment, it does both? Anyway a lot of the things on that list that I've got in italics have been independently verified (for example, Forumite told me he was going to dayvig Adam, then he did so, so his Bastard role is verified). I only bolded the things that have been publicly modconfirmed.
|
|
|
|