Holy Roman Mafia - Page 123

On May 15 2012 19:35 Acrofales wrote:
While I'm posting walls of text, lets make another one with Dog's suspicious behaviours.

1. He completely shat up the thread with a fake posting restriction. This was not a Foolishness posting restriction, where he made sense, but posted in limericks, nor a Drazerk posting restriction where he showered Caller in praise. This was a posting restriction where he figured creating an entire page of morse code woofs was somehow a good idea. P-Body then translated this into hex... which finally got translated into regular text. If the anarchists have a QT, look NO further than page 62 for an example of them jointly shitting up the thread COMPLETELY. Even if they don't have a QT, it was a golden opportunity for P-Body to create anarchy in the thread with that crap... and that opportunity was created by YES_THIS_IS_DOG's retardation.

2.
Could this be Dog trying to divert the lynch off his scumbuddy? Why yes, it could. There is a townie explanation too, but lets not discard the excellent scum reason for this gem of a post.


Fake surprise?

3. The rest of his filter is a discussion of the lurkers. Now I get that most of D2 has been about the lurkers, but some people are trying to make sense of other people too. Dog isn't. He's just blending in with the lurker discussion: a very safe place for scum to hide.

On May 15 2012 23:45 Carolus Magnus wrote:
And I don't think DOG is suspicious. I'm on the fence on jitsu/bard/s&b.

On May 15 2012 23:57 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote:
The case posted against me was completely stupid.

1. If I wanted to create more mayhem then I would have continued doing it-- I stopped doing it because a) people were starting to take the game seriously and b) because I realized I was shitting up the thread more than I intended.
2. Opposing the main lynch should never be considered scummy; it doesn't matter whether or not he flipped scum. I maintain that he didn't look very scummy at the time.
3. Of course the rest of my filter is going to be discussion about the lurkers-- would you rather it be filled with spam? Or Morse code arfs?

On May 16 2012 04:32 Drazerk wrote:
I sense this plan will fail
I think we will end up eaten by a whale

On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:

you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote

anyway

I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2

##vote bluelightz

On May 16 2012 02:42 layabout wrote:

yes.

Are we sharing them?

On May 16 2012 04:43 Acrofales wrote:
Quatol (7): Acrofales (2), Drazerk (1), Forumite (0), YES_THIS_IS_DOG (1), Mattchew (3)
bagmanager (7): Carolus Magnus (1), Zelblade (0), Strongandbig (0), Mr. Potatohead (3), QuickSilver7 (1), Hassybaby (2), Erandorr (0)

People who have not voted according to Toadesstern's sheet of awesome:
Laika: unknown votes. VOTE Companion Cube
Companion Cube: unknown votes. VOTE Laika
U (prpl): unknown votes. VOTE Itouchyou
Itouchyou: unknown votes. VOTE U
Jitsu: unknown votes. VOTE The_Bard
bagmanager: unknown votes. VOTE Hassybaby

Layabout (slightly more complicated):
if you have 1 or 2 votes: VOTE Quatol
if you have 3 votes: VOTE Acrofales

Anybody fucking this up is scum and will be shot in the face.